Chennai Court March 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
DR.N.C.Pavithra Vs G.Navaneetha Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
A.Nos.948 & 949 of 2025 in O.P.No.337 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Applications have been filed to reopen and recall the cross examination of P.W.1 respectively.2. Ms.S.Thamizharasi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that she has no objection in allowing this application.3. Heard both sides.4. Considering the averments made inthe affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in allowing this application, the applications in A.Nos.948 and 949 of 2025 in O.P.No.337 of 2024 are ordered as prayed for. 28.03.2025 (1/3) kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
B. Victoriajayarani vs B. George Arogiyaraj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
CMP No.7977 of 2025 W.A.SR.No.174712 of 2024Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.andC.KUMARAPPAN,J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J.) Mr.G.Pavendran, learned counsel for R1 and Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath, learned Government Advocate, who appears for the official respondents do not very seriously object to the condonation of delay of 270 days in filing the Writ Appeal.2. Hence and also for the reasons set out in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 270 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M.,J] [C.K.,J] https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis sl 28.03.2025...
Sivakami vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Its
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR H.C.P.No.371 of 2025 Sivakami ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Fort St. George Chennai-600 0092.The Commissioner of Police / Detaining Authority Tiruppur City Tiruppur District 3.The Superintendent Central Prison Coimbatore District 4.The Inspector of Police Veerapandi Police Station Tiruppur City ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to produce the body of the detenu by name Gowtham, aged 20, S/o.Balasubramani, presently confined at Central Prison, Coimbatore, before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith, after calling for the records pertaining to the detention order dated 24.12.2024 made in C.No.103/G/IS/Tiruppur City/2024 passed by the 2nd respondent, Goonda act...
S.Krishnamurthy Vs S.Srinivasan and 9 Others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Mr.S.Krishnamurthy Petitioner vs. 1.Mr.S.Srinivasan 2.Mr.S.Anandan 3.Mrs.N.Santhi 4.Mrs.N.Divya Lakshmi 5.Mrs.N.Janani 6.Mrs.S.Sagunthala 7.Mrs.B.Saraswathi 8.Mrs.I.Uma 9.Mr.M.Ramamurthi 10.Mr.M.Natarajan ...RespondentsPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 222 & 276 of the Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925; and Order XXV, Rule 4 of O.S. Rules, prays that he may be allowed to prove the Will dated 13.09.1987 in common form, and that Probate thereof limited to the State of Tamil Nadu may be granted to him. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Venkataramani For Respondent : Mr.P.Vasanth (For R3 to R5) No appearance for RR1, R2, R6 to R8, R9 & R10ORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of Probate for the Last Will and testament dated 13.05.1987 executed by Late.Mrs.G.Danalakshmi, who died on 14.09.2020. The petitioner has been appointed as the only executor under the ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., vs Anthoniyammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
C.M.P.No.6051 of 2025 in C.M.A(Sr).No.24749 of 2025S.SOUNTHAR, J.Notice to 5th respondent is already dispensed with by order dated 14.03.2025.2. Mr.S.P.Yuaraj, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4.4. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 386 days in filing the above CMA is condoned.5. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.S.P.Yuaraj, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 at the time of admission. nr 28.03.2025 Note:Registry is directed to number the CMA and list it for admission, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Deputy Director Vs M/s PPG Teachers Training Institute
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
C.M.P.No.5914 of 2025 in C.M.A(Sr).No.25164 of 2025S.SOUNTHAR, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.2. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 107 days in filing the above CMA is condoned.3. Registry is directed to printthe name of Mr.M.Hariharan, learned counsel for the respondent at the time of admission. nr 28.03.2025 Note:Registry is directed to number the CMA and list it for admission, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Kaliyammal vs Krishna Reddy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANKaliyammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.Krishna Reddy 2.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, (Crime No.554 of 2014) Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the second respondent to execute the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against the first respondent /A2, by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai on 21.01.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Munisamy For R2 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to execute the pending Non-Bailable Warrant issued against the first respondent in Crl.M.P. Nos. 1435 to 1437 of 2020 in C.C. No. 7 of 2015, by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai.2. Heard the learned c...
Chitra vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by Its Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR H.C.P.No.379 of 2025 Chitra ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Fort St. George Chennai-600 0092.The Commissioner of Police / Detaining Authority Tiruppur City Tiruppur District 3.The Superintendent Central Prison Coimbatore District 4.The Inspector of Police Veerapandi Police Station Tiruppur City ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to produce the body of the detenu by name Karthi, aged 22, S/o.Murugesh, presently confined at Central Prison, Coimbatore, before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith, after calling for the records pertaining to the detention order dated 27.12.2024 made in C.No.105/G/IS/Tiruppur City/2024 passed by the 2nd respondent, Goonda act and qu...
Vijayalakshmi vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by Its, Additional Chief S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of TamilNadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government Department of Prohibition and Excise (Home) Secretariat, Chennai -92.The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Vepery, Chennai - 7 3.The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison Puzhal, Chennai 4.The Inspector of Police PEW, i/c H-1, Washermenpet Police Station Chennai ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in No.1241/ BCDFGISSSV/2025 dated 12.12.2024, on the file of second respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and produce the detenu viz. Praveenraj, son of Kasirajan, aged about 34 years, who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.Ilayaraja K...
R.Suresh vs the Commissioner of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR R.Suresh ... Petitioner Vs. Kolathur, Channai-99. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents herein to produce the detenu S.Baskaran before this Court, who is missing from 17.12.2024 and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Krishnaraj For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.)When the petitioner's brother-in-law, namely S.Baskaran, S/o.Samy, aged about 50 years, had gone missing, he had lodged a complaint on 17.12.2024 before the second respondent Police and the same was registered in F.I.R. No.615 of 2024. Since the petitioner's brother-in-law could not be traced within a reasonable time, he has filed th...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »