Skip to content

Chennai Court March 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 28 2025

M.Varatharaj vs the Collector

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P. NO. 11305 of 2025 M.Varatharaj .. Petitioner Vs1. The Collector, O/o. Collector Office, 2.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police Office, 3.The Inspector of Police, Poolampatti Police Station, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District. .. RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, directing the respondents to provide immediate and adequate protection to the petitioner and his family from threats, harassment and intimidation by the petitioner's uncles, their sons, and their associates; to consequently conduct a thorough, impartial, and time- bound investigation into the threats, harassment and intimidation faced by the petitioner and his family and take appropriate legal action, including the arrest of the accused within a time frame stipulated by this Hon'ble Court to ...


Mar 28 2025

Saraswathi Murugesan vs the Additional Chief Secretary,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARSaraswathi Murugesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Additional Chief Government of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police / Detaining Authority City Police Office Huzur Road, Coimbatore - 18 3.The Superintendent Central Prison 4.The Inspector of Police B-2, R.S. Puram Police Station Coimbatore ...Respondents Prayer : Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for therecords pertaining to the order of detention passed by the second respondent herein and made in C.No.107/G/IS/2024 dated 06.09.2024, and to set aside the same and directing the third respondent to produce the detenu, the petitioner's husband, C.Murugesan, @ Murugesa Pandian, aged 42 years, now confined in Central P...


Mar 28 2025

S.Shyam Kumarm vs the Registrar,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA S. Shyam Kumar ... Petitioner Vs1. The Registrar Anna University Sardar Patel Road, Old Highways Building, Guindy, Chennai 600 025.2. The Principal Jerusalem College of Engineering, Velachery Main road, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai Chennai 600 100.3. The Controller of ExaminationsJerusalem College of Engineering Velachery main road, Narayanapuram Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100. .... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to condone the lack of attendance and thereby permit the petitioner to attend the 2nd year classes and to write the 2nd year examination. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish Rajan For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan Standing Counsel for R1ORDERThis writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to condone the lack of attendance...


Mar 28 2025

The Government of Tamilnadu vs V.K.Sattanathan

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

CMP No.4569 of 2025 in WA SR No.23993 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is ordered, the delay of 167 days in filing the Appeal is condoned. [R.S.M., J.] [G.A.M., J.] 28.03.2025 jv https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...


Mar 28 2025

B.Ganesan vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

2025:MHC:869IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 29.01.2025Pronounced on: 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Review Application Nos.256, 264, 265, 285, 288, 260, 261, 262, 263, 266, 277, 278, 279, 280, 284, 286, 287, 257, 258, 259, 281, 289, 290, 273, 274, 275, 267, 268, 269, 271, 272, 276, 282, 283 & 270 of 2015 B.Ganesan ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.256/2015 R.Manoharan ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.257/2015 J.Palanisamy ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.258/2015 K.R.Venkatesan ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.259/2015 K.Ramasamy ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.260/2015 M.Maragathavel ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.261/2015 A.Deivasigamani ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.262/2015 A.Basha ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.263/2015 M.Ramadoss ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.264/2015 K.Gopalachari ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.265/2015 S.C.Kandasamy ... Petitioner in Rev.Appl. No.266/2015 C.Muniraju ... Pe...


Mar 28 2025

Flextronics Power India Pvt. Ltd., Vs L.Raji

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 19.02.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 28.03.2025PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE W.P.Nos. 5729, 5731, 6173, 6175 & 6177 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos. 6689, 6691, 6692, 6693, 7248, 7249, 7251, 7252, 7253 of 2020, 1003, 3443 of 2023 Flextronics Power India Pvt. Ltd Now known as Flextronics Technology India Pvt. Ltd Plot No.3/Phase 2, Industrial Park, Sandevlue C Village, Sreeperambadur Taluk 602 106 Petitioner in all WPs Vs. L.Raji, Son of Loganathan, Nehru Nagar Check Post, Velacherry 600042. ...Respondent in W.P.No.5729 of 2020 B.Karthikeyan S/o. Balasubramanian, 14, Station Road, Annur -Thiruverkaadu, Chennai 600 077. Respondent in W.P.No.5731 of 2020 K.Sridhar, S/o. GP Karunakaran, Thottapalayam, Vellore 532 004. ...Respondent in W.P.No.6173 of 2020 P.Jagadeesan, S/o. Paulraj, Ranipet, Vellore 632 401 Respondent in W.P.No.6175 of 2020 S.Ganeshan S/o. Subamatan, Lakshmi Nagar, Porur, Chennai 632 401. Respondent in W.P....


Mar 28 2025

A.Balasundari Vs The Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASORDERS RESERVED ON : 23.01.2025 ORDERS PRONOUNCED ON : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.Nos.30691 to 30698 of 2015 A.Balasundari ... Petitioner in WP No.30691/2015 P.Latha Rani ... Petitioner in WP No.30692/2015 P.Daisy Suseelabai ... Petitioner in WP No.30693/2015 P.V.Saraswathi ... Petitioner in WP No.30694/2015 R.Suseela ... Petitioner in WP No.30695/2015 S.Nageswari ... Petitioner in WP No.30696/2015 R.Indirani ... Petitioner in WP No.30697/2015N.Thulasi ... Petitioner in WP No.30698/2015 Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.Additional Director General of Prisons, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. ... Respondents in all W.Ps.Prayer in W.P.Nos.30691 to 30698 of 2015 : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed b...


Mar 28 2025

Anjalam vs the State Represented by Its

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR and W.M.P.No.7528 of 2025 Anjalam ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep. by its, Salem. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records pertaining to the Impugned Order bearing No.235223/Tha.Ku- and consecutively direct the 1st respondent to grant ordinary leave for 30 days without escort to the detenu namely Ayyandurai, S/o.Balakrishnan,aged about 34 years, bearing Convict No.9696 and PID No.54877 at Central Prison, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Pandiyan For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorse...


Mar 28 2025

Jothi vs the State Rep. by Its

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR and W.M.P.No.7261 of 2025 Jothi ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by its, 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Coimbatore Range, 2.The Superintendent, 3.The Superintendent, Salem Central Prison, Salem 636 007. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling forthe records pertaining to the impugned order bearing orderNo.28021/Tha.ku.3/2024, dated 10.01.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consecutively direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 21 days without escort to the detenu namely Mani @ Manikandan, S/o.Thangaraj, aged about 36 years, Convict No.23259, confined at Central Prison, Salem. For Petitioner : Dr.S.S.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj,...


Mar 28 2025

Hussainuddin vs the Member Secretary

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE N.MALA Hussainuddin S/o. Azeezmuddin, 87, Triplicane Road, Madras-5, Now Residing at Old No.17, New No.35, Big Street, Triplicane, Chennai 600 005. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Member Secretary (in Charge)Mamallapuram Local Planning Authority, Chengalpattu-1. 2.The President Vadanemeli Panchayat, Thiruporur Panchayat Union, Kancheepuram District. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in Roc 823/2013 Ma.U.Thigu (5) dated 15.10.2013 and quash the proceedings therein as illegal, incompetent, irregular and without jurisdiction.For Petitioner: Mr.V.Raghavachary Senior Counsel for Mrs.V.Srimathi For Respondents: Mr.M.Suresh Kumar Additional Advocate General Assisted by M/s.P.Aishwarya Government AdvocateORDERThe present Writ Petition is filed for issuance ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial