Chennai Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Palanisamy vs M.Parvathamani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28/11/2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL AND C.M.P.NO.8265 OF 2023 M.Palanisamy ... Petitioner/1st Respondent/ 1st Defendant Vs. 1.M.Parvathamani ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner/ Plaintiff 2.P.Senthilkumar 3.Nallasivam 4.Manoranjitham 5.Chinnammal ... Respondents 2 to 5/ Respondents 2 to 5 Defendants 2 to 5 (The Respondents 2 to 5 are remained exparte before the Trial Court, hence notice may be dispensed with for the Respondents 2 to 5) Page No.1 of 4 PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of theConstitution of India, 1950, praying to set aside the Fair and Final Orderdated February 01, 2023 made in I.A.No.03 of 2022 in O.S.No.99 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Perundurai. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ramaraj for Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondent-1 : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondents-2 to 5 : Ex parte by Order dated June 07, 2023 by Joint Registrar (AS)ORDERMr.C.Ramaraj appearing for Mr.M.Guruprasad, Couns...
J Chandramouli Proprietor of Ms Smriti Systems vs Ms Jrd Systems Priva ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON 15.10.2025PRONOUNCED ON 28.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR in C.S. (Comm Div) DR No.44409 of 2025 1.J.Chandramouli Proprietor of M/s.Smriti Systems Residing at 1B, Aditi Apartments 59, Rukmani Street, Kalakshetra Colony, Beasant Nagar Chennai - 600 090 Applicant(s) Vs 1.M/s.JRD Systems Private Limited #1, 2nd Floor, Horizon Pai Layout Old Madras Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560016 Represented by its Managing Director Kalavathi Depa2.M/s.JRD Systems Inc. Page 1/20 Represented by its authorised Signatory 42450, Hayes Rd., Suite 3, Clinton Township, MI 48038, United States of America Respondent(s) PRAYER : Application filed to grant leave to the applicant/plaintiff to institute the present suit against the respondents/defendants under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent of the Madras High Court. For Applicant(s): Mr.M.S.Bharath For Respondent(s): Mr.Gowtham KumarORDERThe present application has been fil...
Akkala Siva Kottaiah vs Union Ofindia Thorough Inspector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NOS.8673 and 11519 of 20251. Akkala Siva Kottaiah ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.8673 of 2025/ A22. B. Rukesh @ Suresh ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.11519 of 2025/ A3Vs Union of India, Rep. by, The Junior Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai Zonal Unit, Chennai - 600 077. (F.No.48/1/06/2023-NCB/MDS) ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.230 of 2024 on the file of the Hon'ble II Additional Special Judge, Special Court for EC & NDPS Act, Chennai. For Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.8673 of 2025 : Mr. S. Kasirajan For Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.11519 of 2025 : Mr. M.G. Martinmanivannan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.P. Kumar Special Public Prosecutor *******ORDERThe petitioner/ Akkala Siva Kottaiah was arrested and remanded to judicial custod...
R.Sivakumar Vs Rajesh Lakhoni, IAS.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA R.Sivakumar S/o. Rajaram, No. 47, Car Street, Singirikudi post, Cuddalore Taluk. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Rajesh Lakhoni, I.A.S.,Contemnor(s) Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempts of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for gross disobedience of the orders of this Honble Court in W.P.No.32563 of 2023 dated 20.11.2023. For Petitioner(s): M/s. N.Suresh For Contemnor(s): Mr.G.Anandgopalan, for M/s.Agam LegalORDERThe contempt petition is filed for disobedience of the order of this Court dated 20.11.2023.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought time.3. The learned counsel for the contemnors on the other hand submitted thatthe order passed by this Court has been complied with. The learned counsel produced the copy of the order dated 06.01.2025, granting permanent status to the petitioner.4. In view of the order of the respondents dated 06.01.2025, this Court is oft...
J.Dhanalakshmi, vs D.Vijaya Manikandan,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and C.M.P.No.30014 of 2025 J.Dhanalakshmi .. Appellant Vs. D.Vijaya Manikandan .. Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal preferred under Section 19 of theFamily Courts Act, 1984, to set aside the Fair Order and Decretal Orderdated 21.01.2025 in O.P.No.2117 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court, Chennai, and allow the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal For Appellant : Mr.Gopalakrishnan T.C For Respondent : Mr.S.P.C.BuddhanJUDGMENTThe appellant and the respondent got married on 01.02.2023. Due to misunderstandings, the wife filed a petition for divorce by under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, before the Family Court in O.P.No.2117 of 2024. The said petition was dismissed on 21.01.2025.2. Being aggrieved, the petitioner /wife preferred an appeal in C.M.A.No.3614 of 2025, challenging the order passed by the Fam...
M/s.Khazana Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., Vs Income Tax Settlement Commission
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on 29.08.2025Pronounced on 28.11.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY & W.M.P.Noss.12983 & 12986 of 2020 M/s.Khazana Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Mr.Kishore Kumar Jain, 252A, NASA Building, TTK Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018. (Now at No.48, Khazana Square, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014.) ... Petitioner Vs.1. Income Tax Settlement Commission Additional Bench, Chennai, Satguru Complex, 640, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.2. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Investigation Wing, Central Circle 2(2), Chennai, New No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai - 600 034. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent contained in its impugned order bearing S.A.No.TN/CN/52/2018-19/17-IT dated 11.06.2020 and to...
Vasanthi Suresh vs Jayachitra Sahaya Josephine
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on :10.11.2025Pronounced on :28.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR O.S.A.No.206 of 2020 1.Vasanthi Suresh W/o late Mr.Suresh Jayakumar Ignatius, Plot No.474, 19th Street, IV Sector, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 600 078. 2.Abhilasha A.J., D/o late Mr.Suresh Jayakumar Ignatius, W/o Dr.Balaji.P. Rep.by her Power of Attorney Agent, Vasanthi Suresh W/o Late Mr.Suresh Jayakumar Ignatius, th Plot No.474, 19 Street, IV Sector, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 600 078. 3.Aadarsh Ignatius S/o Late Mr.Suresh Jayakumar Ignatius, Plot No.474, 19th Street, IV Sector, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 600 078.(Auto Dev Prakash, S/o late Mr.A.X.Ignatius Plot No.474, 19th Street, IV Sector, K.K.Nagar, IV Sector, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 600 078. (R2 transposed as A4 vide order of Court dated 18.11.2024 made in C.M.P.No.160 of 2021 in O.S.A.No. 206 of 2020(CJ &SKRJ)Cause title accepted vide Court orderdated 09.09.2020 in ...
The State of Tamilnadu vs D Ramajayam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
C.M.P.No.8404 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.50063 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) All the respondents were served and the name and address of the respondents have been shown in the cause list, none present before this Court.2. Since the delay is only 465 days, having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (K.G.T., J.) 28.11.2025 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
National Insurance Co Ltd., Vs P.Sasikumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
C.M.P.No.14562 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.49102 of 2025Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.andMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J.[Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.] The petition has been filed with a delay of 98 days in preferring the above appeal.2. Notice has been served onrespondents 1 to 4 and counsel has been engaged on their behalf. As far as the 5th respondent is concerned, the private notice has been returned with the endorsement as address not sufficient.3. From the records, we find evenbefore the Tribunal, the 5th respondent, who was arrayed as 1st respondent, did not contest the proceedings and was set exparte. In such circumstances and since there is no objection from the contesting respondents, the petition seeking condonation of delay of 98 days is allowed. [Dr.G.J., J.] & [M.S.K., J.] 28.11.2025 rpl Note: The Registry is directed to number theAppeal, if it is otherwise in order...
L. Sengottian vs Management of Ponni Sugar and Chemicals Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
CMP.Nos.28487 and 28481 of 2024 in W.A.Sr.Nos.51919 and 51918 of 2024M.S.RAMESH, J.ANDR.SAKTHIVEL, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 94 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the orders passed in W.P.No.4407 of 2004 and W.P.No.25778 of 2003, dated 01.12.2023. 2.Mr.Anand Gopalan, learned counsel for the first respondent and reports that he has no objection in the petitions being allowed. 3.Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavits filed in support of these condone delay petitions, the delay of 94 days is condoned and these petitions stand allowed.4. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeals, if the papers are otherwise inorder and post the same in regular course.[M.S.R., J] [R.S.V., J] 28.11.2025 Anu...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »