Chennai Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
L.Kamal Batcha(Died) vs Fuji Films India Private Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on 22.09.2025Pronounced on 28.11.2025Coram:The Honourable Mrs. Justice K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI Second Appeal No.206 of 2023 L.Kamal Batcha (died) Proprietor National Pharma Hospital & Research Institute, Thanjavur. 1.Mohammed Sara 2.Ayesha Raja 3.Najima 4.Dr.K.Mujibur Rahman M.D. 5.Dr.Mohammed Ali M.D ..Appellantsversus1.Fuji Films India Private Limited, A Company registered under the Companies Act and represented by its Senior Executive, Customer Support, Medical division. 2.M/s.Ultra Globe Systems, Represented by its Maintenance Manager. .. Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 CPC, praying to set aside the decree and judgement dated 07.09.2022 made in A.S.No.35 of 2021 on the file of the learned XV Additional Judgment Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.12.2019 made in O.S. No. 4893 of 2017 on the file of the learned XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Cou...
Mahalakshmi(Died) vs Marimuthu(Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.11.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Mahalakshmi (Died) 2.P.Kaliyaperumal 3.K.Kannan 4.S.Puvaneshwari 5.P.Rajendraprasad : Appellants A2 to A5 are B/R as Lrs of thedeceased sole appellant vide orderdated 07.02.2025 in CMP No.10522/2023 in SA No.43/2012 (KRSJ)versusMarimuthu : Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 18.07.2014 in AS No.9 of 2013 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge at Nagapattinam reversing the judgment and decree dated 12.06.2013 in O.S.No.275 of 2009 on the file of the Court of District Munsif at Nagapattinam. For Appellants : Mrs.R.T.Shyamala For Respondent : Mr.K.RaghuramanJUDGMENTThis second appeal has been preferred as against the decree andjudgment passed by the Sub Court, Nagapattinam in AS No.9 of 2013 dated18.07.2014.2. The appellant herein has filed the suit before the District MunsifCourt, Nagapattinam in OS No.275 of 2009 for the relief of recovery of po...
Natesan vs Senthil Raja
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and C.M.P. No. 3022 OF 2023 NATESAN S/o Ranga Pillai, Opposite Mariamman Temple, Porasalpatti Akkaraipatti Post, Mallasamudhram Via, Namakkal Dt. Appellant(s) Vs Senthil Raja S/o A.Subramaniam, Kanakkupillai Thottam, Opposite Mariamman Temple, Porasalpatti Akkarai Post, Mallasamudhram Via, Namakkal Dt. Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Rasipuram dated 10.04.2015 in A.S. No.8 of 2014 confirming theJudgment and Decree of the learned District Munsif, Rasipuram dated08.04.2013 in O.S. No.214 of 2010. For Appellant(s): M/s.T.M.Hariharan For Respondent(s): Mr. T.R. Rajagopalan, Senior Advocate for M/s.P.Veena SureshORDERThe Second Appeal has been preferred as against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Rasipuram dated 10.04.2015 in A.S. No.8...
Mrs.Vidya Nathan Vs I.Jitesh Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 152 of 2024 and Appln.No.2041 of 2024 Mrs.Vidya Nathan ..Petitioner(s) Vs I.Jitesh Kumar Respondent(s) PRAYER Petition filed under Section 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the award dated 01.09.2012 in Arb/JK/M/01 of 2012. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Prashant Rajagopal For Respondent(s): Mr.Nithyaesh NatrajORDERLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Arbitration Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Arbitration Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected application is also closed. No Costs. 3.The Registry is directed to refund the entire Court fee to the petitioner. 28-11-2025 Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Y...
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs VC Deepak Sara ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR IN WP NO. 1212 OF 2019 Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Rep by it Managing Director, No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chintadripet,Chennai-600 002 .......Petitioner Vs V.C. Deepak Saravanan D/o.V.Chandrasekaran, Abinaya Flats No.309, AIBEA Nagar 1st Cross Street, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041 ......RespondentPrayer: Petition filed under Article 224 of Constitution of India, praying to modify the order dated 07.11.2024 made in WP.No. 1212 of 2019 by deleting the sentence In reply to the same, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent would submit that already the respondent - Board decided to entrust the recruitment work to the TNPSC hereinafter. It is placed on record and thus render justice.For Petitioner :Mr.Krishan Ravindran For Respondent: Mr.A.Mohamed IsmailORDERThis miscellaneous petition is filed to modify the order dated 07.11.2024 made in WP.No. 1212 of...
M.G.Kannabiran Vs Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and WMP.No.9560 & 9562 of 2019 M.G.Kannabiran .. petitioner vs Anna Salai, Chennai 2. RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 08.11.2018 in memo No.25026/Pa.Pi.(Nir)4/MTC/2018 issued by the 2nd respondent, quash the same in so far as restricting the alternative employment given to the petitioner only for 3 months and asking the officials to give him driver work after expiry of 3 months and after getting fitness certificate from the Corporation's Medical Officer and consequently direct the respondents to provide him suitable alternative employment / light duty in commensurate with his health condition, with continuity of service, pay protection, back wages and with all other attendant/service benefits with effect from08...
K.Sampath Vs Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd.,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 25.11.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 28.11.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.9653 of 2019 K.Sampath .. Petitioner vs 1.Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., rep. By its Managing Director, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. 2.Senior Deputy Manager (HR) Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., Pallavan Salai, Chennai -2. 3.The Dean Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai -3. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide the petitioner forthwith suitable alternative employment on permanent basis, in commensurate with his health condition, based on the report submitted by the 3rd respondent/Region Medical Board and based on the examination made by them on 02.11.2018, with pay protection, continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits w.e.f. 30.07.2015, afte...
Sathianathan vs Kandavel (Deceased)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE C.M.P.Nos.12698, 12699 &12700 of 2025 in A.S. No.278 of 2018 Sathianathan ... Petitioner Vs Kandavel (deceased)1. Kalaiselvi2. Kalaimani3. Madana4. Veerakumar ... RespondentsPRAYER in CMP No.12698 of 2025: To condone the delay of 797 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased sole respondent viz., Kandavel in the above A.S.No.278 of 2018. PRAYER in CMP No.12699 of 2025: To set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole respondent Kandavel in the above A.S.No.278 of 2018. PRAYER in CMP No.12698 of 2025: To bring on record the legal representatives of the respondent, namely the proposed respondents 1 to 4 as the respondents 2 to 5 in the above A.S.No.278 of 2018. For Petitioner :Mr.T.SaikrishnanORDERThese petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 797 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caus...
A.K.S. Manian vs Vadivel
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.11.2025 PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE in A.S.No.222 of 2019 A.K.S.Manian, S/o.late Kailasam, Door No.68, AyyanThottam, Pudhu Pallipalayam Road, Komarapalayam 638 183 Kumarapalayam Agraharam Village, Kumarapalayam Taluk, Namakkal District. ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Vadivel, S/o.Rathinam 2.Tamilselvi, W/o.Vadivel 3.Gokulraj, S/o.Vadivel 4.Pratap S/o.Vadivel5.Minor Kamaraj, S/o.Vadivel, Minor rep., by next friend father Vadievel All are residing at Door No.7/27, Kattuvalavu, Gajjalnaickenpatty Post, Salem Taluk & District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Order 41 Rule 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 16.02.2023 and re-hear the appeal passed in A.S.No.222 of 2019 by this Court and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.For Petitioner : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy. For Resp...
Tamilarasan vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI in Tamilarasan Petitioner vs. The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondent Prayer in C.M.P.No.14367 of 2024.: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order IV Rule 9(4) of AS Rules to condone the delay of 257 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Order dated 31.01.2023 and made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.6269 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, IV Judge, Court of Small Causes, Prayer in C.M.A.SR.No.71506 of 2023 : This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against theOrder dated 31.01.2023 and made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.6269 of 2017 on thefile of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, IV Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. . R.KALAIMATHI, J., ssn For Petitioner : Ms.M.Malar For Respondent : Mr.M.Murali VinodhORDERHeard the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »