Chennai Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Qd Seatoman Designs Pvt. Ltd., vs Lifestyle Equities CV,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 20.01.2025 DELIVERED ON:31.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI A.No.201 of 2025 in Arb.O.P.(Com.Div.)No.17 of 2025 QD Seatoman Designs Pvt Ltd., Represented by its Director Syed Layak Ali, 5th Floor, Status Quo, 38, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. .... Applicant vs1. Lifestyle Equities CV,Prins Bernhardplein, 1097 JB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Rep by the Power of Attorney Abhishek Kotnala, Shanti Vihar, Phase II, Haridwar by-pass, ISBT Road, Dehradun, uttarkhand-248121.2. Quintessential Designs India Pvt.Ltd (QDIPL), 5th Floor, Status Quo, 38, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.3. Quintessential Designs India Pvt.Ltd (Apparel Venture (QDIPL-AV)5th Floor, Status Quo, 38, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules for grant of Interim Stay of the effect, operation and implementation of the impugned Arbitral Award dated 17.10.20...
R.Karthik Kumar vs the District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA R.Karthik Kumar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri. 2.The Sub Collector Hosur 3.The Tahsildar Soolagiri Taluk Soolagiri 4.R.Subramani ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the firstrespondent herein to dispose of the revision petition dated 04.09.2024 filed by the petitioner for cancelling the patta issued in the name of the fourth respondent herein and to issue patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of his lands measuring 0.02 cents in S.F.No.70/1A2 situate at Nallakanakothapalli Village, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, within a stipulated period and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.For Petitioner : Mr.V.Govi Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Go...
Arumugam vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 2340 of 2025 Arumugam ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector Room no.1, First Floor, Collectorate, Salem 636001. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office Compound, Tiruchengode road, Sangagiri, Sangagiri taluk, Salem district 637301. 3.The Tahsildar, Edappadi, Edappadi taluk, Salem district 637101 ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the 3rd respondent herein in file no. consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of the property comprising in survey No. 159/4c measuring 0.68 cents (0.27.50 hect), situated at Avaniperur Keelmugam Village, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Mayilnathan For Respondents : Mr. P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader...
Mr.K.Gopalsamy vs Dhanabackiyam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.R.C.No.165 of 2025 K.Gopalsamy ... Petitioner/Accused in both cases Vs. Dhanabackiyam ... Respondent in both cases PRAYER in Crl.M.P.No.1286 of 2025: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 (1) of BNSS, to suspend the sentence dated 29.09.2021 imposed in C.C.No.121 of 2015 by learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet and confirmed in Crl.A.No.95 of 2021 by IV Additional District Court, Udumalpet dated 18.12.2024. PRAYER in Crl.M.P.No.1645 of 2025: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 of BNSS, to grant an order of exemption from surrendering before the trial Court consequent to the sentence imposed on 29.09.2021 in C.C.No.121 of 2015 by Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet and confirmed in Crl.A.No.95 of 2021 by IV Additional District Court, Udumalpet dated 18.12.2024. For petitioner : Mr.P.MuthusamyORDERThese Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions ...
Mr.T.Rajendiran vs the Tahsildar Cum Executive Magistrate
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA & W.M.P.Nos. 3051, 3052 & 3054 of 2025 1.Mr.T.Rajendiran 2.Mrs.Prema 3.Mr.Sivalingam 4.Mrs.Padmalaskhmi 5.Mrs.Josmin 6.Mrs.Mageshwari 7.Mrs.Vasanthi 8.Mr.Ravishankar 9.Mr.Dillibabu 10.Mr.Kannan ...Petitioners Vs.The Tahsildar cum Executive Magistrate Thiruvottiyur Tahsil, Chennai 600 019 ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus call for the records of the respondent in Form 7 dated 30.12.2024 in respect of the residential houses of the petitioners in ward c, block 2, TS.no.108/3, old survey no.154, Ernavoor village, Thiruvottiyur taluk, Chennai 600 019 and quash the same and direct the respondent to permit the petitioners to continue to reside in the same premises by classifying the area as residential one, or alternatively direct the respondent to allocate a similar residence in a nearby area to all the petitioner...
Ramaniyam Real Estate Pvt Ltd vs Gunda Ramani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
OSA NO. 23 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and M/s. Ramaniyam Real Estate Pvt Ltd rep by its Managing Director V. Jaggannathan, D.No.17/35, 2nd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 20. (Now shifted to 14/67, 3rd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 20. ) .. Appellant Vs1. Gunda Ramani W/o. G.T.S. Kumar, 2.K.Rangavalli W/o.Karthick Chander 3.Pathi Lakshmi Kiran W/o.Uday Kiran 4.Karthick Chander S/o.Late Ragupathy 5.The Sub Registrar, Sub -Registrar Adyar, Kamaraj Avenue 2nd Street, Adyar, Chennai-600020 .. RespondentsCommon Prayer : These Original Side Appeals are under Order 36 Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with 15 of Letters Patent Act to set aside the order passed in A.Nos. 4603 & 4604 of 2024 in C.S.No. 68 of 2021 dated 29.10.2024. For Appellant : Mr.S.Sundaresan For Respondent(s): Mr. Sk.Rahul Vivek - R2 Mr. T.Arun Kumar, AGP - R5COMMON JUDGMENT(Ord...
The State of Tamilnadu vs R.Ramalingam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND Rep. by its District Collector, Ariyalur District. I the place of The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its District Collector, Perambalur, Perambalur District. and another Vs S/o. Ramasamy, Konerirayampuram, Ariyalur Taluk. Vs R.Siddarth, Government PleaderORDERThis petition is filed to accept the cause title as the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its District Collector, Ariyalur District in the place of the State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its District collector, Perambalur, Perambalur District, in the above Second Appeal S.A.SR.No.6419 of 2024.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the material available in the record.3. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as prayed for.4. Registry is directed to list the above Second Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order, on 17.02.2025. rriT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.rri AND...
Mr. M. Abi Vs P.Avichandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.01.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Mr.M.Abi ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.P.Ravichandiran The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for the violation and disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.25941 of 2024 dated 06.09.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Saravanan For Respondent : Ms.P.Raja Rajeswari Government AdvocateORDERThis contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of theorder dated 06.09.2024 made in W.P.No.25941 of 2024.M.DHANDAPANI,J.pri 2.This Court vide order dated 06.09.2024 made in W.P.No.25941 of 2024 directed the petitioner to make representation along with a copy of the order and issued direction to the respondent to consider the said representation and to pass appropriate orders within a time frame, pursuant to which, the respondent has passed ord...
K. Suganya vs a.S. Sankar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN C.R.P.No.447 of 2024 & CMP.No.2133 of 2004 K.Suganya .. PetitionerVersusA.S.Sankar .. Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.10.2023 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2023 in HMOP.No.44 of 2022 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Rasipuram. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil For Respondent : Mr.V.RegunathanORDERThis civil revision petition arises against the order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge at Rasipuram in I.A.No.3 of 2023 in HMOP.No.44 of 2022 dated 06.10.2023.2. The civil revision petitioner is the wife. The respondent is thehusband. They entered into matrimony on 11.06.2009. From the wedlock, two female children were born to the couple. The elder child is aged about 13 years and the younger one is aged about 10 years. Due to disputes and differences, the parties s...
J.Raja Bhushanam vs Union of India Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN1. J.Raja Bhushanam W/o.Late N.Jaganathan, No.2 Khanmani Mettu Street, Palakkarai, Trichy 620021 Petitioner(s) Vs1. Union Of India Rep. By The General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai 600003. 2.The Divisional Security Commandant Railway Protection Force, Tiruchirapallai. Respondent(s)Prayer: This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner towards revised Family Pension in Pay Band-II of Rs.9,300/- - Rs.34800/- + GP Rs.4,200/- with a minimum protection of Rs.7,215/- based on the representation dated 12.04.2018 and reminder dated 19.03.2024 on merits and as per the Revised pay rules within a time to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s): L. ChandrakumarN.R.Jasmine Padma V.Dinesh For R1 Mr.Ramamoorthy, CGCORDERThis Writ Petition is file...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »