Chennai Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Manickam vs the Tamil Nadu State Level Scrutiny Committee-II
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.01.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN K.Manickam ...Petitioner Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Level Scrutiny Committee - II, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009, rep. by its Chairman ...RespondentPrayer: Writ Petition filed under 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to confirm the social status of the petitioner and his sons M.Natarajan and M.Idhayakumar that they belongs to Kurumans (ST) Community based upon the report of the Vigilance Cell dated 23.08.202 in view of the Manual in G.O.Ms.No.104, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department dated 21.08.2023 and dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dayaram Vs. Sudhir Batham & others reported in 2011 (6) CTC 192 which was followed by this Hon'ble Court in G.Venkitasamy Case reported in 2016(1) MLJ 606 and T.K.Kariyappan Case in W.P.No.23397 of 2019 dated 19.10.202...
Babu Amirthalingam vs S.Nandhini @ Sadhana
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN in CRP SR NO. 3815 OF 2025 Babu Amirthalingam S/o. Amirthalingam, 327 Fountayne Lane, Lawrencevile, New Jersey - 08648, USA. Rep by his power of Attorney, V.Srinivasan, S/o.Late N.Viswanathan, No.40 Ragavan Street, Perambur, Chennai - 600 011. Appellant(s) Vs S.Nandhini @ Sadhana D/o. Subramanian, No.192, 23rd Street, Krishna Nagar, Maduravoyal, Chennai - 600 095. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s.G.R.ASSOCIATESORDERThis petition has been filed to accept the cause title of the Revision Petition filed against the orderdated 05.06.2020 passed in M.C.No.4/2020 by the learned III Additional Family Court, Chennai.2. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed. 3.Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments. 31-01-2025 arr To1. S.Nandhini @ Sadhana D/o. Subramanian, No.192, 23rd Street, Kris...
P.Arumugam vs the Thasildar,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHAP.Arumugam ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Thasildar, Thasildar Office, Tirupattur district. 2.The Land Surveyor Tirupattur district 3.Murugesan ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey the land of the petitioner property situated in S.no. 149/6b2 to the extent of 21.26 cents (0.8.61 ares), situated at Thamalerimuthur village and post, Tirupattur taluk, Tirupattur district by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2024.For Petitioner : Mr. M.Arun For Respondents : Mr. S.Jayachandran 1&2 Government Advocate.ORDERSeeking a mandamus to the respondents 1 and 2, to survey the property, the petitioner is before this Court.2. The petitioner submits that he is the absolute owner of thesubject property, vide settlement deed executed by his mother on 27.06.2020. In order to measure the ...
Saleena vs the State Rep by Its
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.No.1021 of 2025 Saleena ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by its, 1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Trichy Range, 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Trichy 620 020. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned order No.RO/TRY/650/Mu.Vu./2024 dated 20.12.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consecutively direct the 1 st respondent to grant leave for one month without escort to the detenue, A.M.Hakkim, aged about 41 years, S/o.Abdul Majith, life convict prisoner, bearing Convict No.22928, detained at Central prison, Trichy. For Petitioner : Ms.K.Akshaya For Respon...
Vinoth vs the State Rep by Its,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN -- Vinoth .. Petitioner Vs.2. S.Dhayanithi .. RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS praying to direct the Judicial Magistrate No.1, at Alandur to dispose of C.C.No.534 of 2018 within specific time limit as fixed by this Court. For petitioner : Mr.N.Stalin For respondents: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R-1ORDERThe petitioner has filed the present petition seeking to direct the Judicial Magistrate No.1, at Alandur, Chennai, to dispose of C.C.No.534 of 2018 within specific time limit that may be fixed by this Court.2. Taking into account the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the Page No.1/3petition and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the trial Court to dispose of C.C.No.534 of 2018 (on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.1, Alandur, Chennai) as expeditiously as possible. ...
Chandirakasan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 2258 of 2025 Chandirakasan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector Collector Office Cuddalore, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Office Virudhachalam, 3.The Thasildar Tittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to issue patta in favor for the petitioner for the property comprised in survey no. 64/2 situated at Avinankudi village, Tittagdui taluk, Cuddalore district, in pursuance of petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr. K.Karuppaiya Mooppanar For Respondents : Mr. P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader.ORDERThe Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: To direct the 3rd respondent to issue patta in favor for the petitioner for the property comprised in survey no. 64/2 situated at Avinankudi village, Tittagdui taluk, C...
E.Suresh vs the District Registrar(Administration)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No.2563 of 2025 E.Suresh .... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Registrar (Administration) District Registrar Office Thiruvallur District Thiruvallur - 602 001. 2.The Sub Registrar Ponneri Sub-Registrar Office Ponneri - 601 204. 3.The Executive Officer Arulmigu Karikrishna Perumal Thirukoil Tamil Nadu HR&CE Department Thiruayarpaadi Ponneri - 601 204 Thiruvallur District. ... RespondentPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.158/2024 dated 12.12.2024 and quash the same as ultravires, arbitrary, unconstitutional, vague, ambiguous and untenable and consequently direct the second respondent to register the petitioner's sale deed dated 26.03.2024 presented for registration before the second respondent in respect of 971 ...
D.Jaffer Khan vs the Chief Executive Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR D.Jaffer Khan ... Petitioner vs. Tamilnadu Wakf Board No.1, Jaffer Shreong Street Vallal Seethakathi Nagar Chennai 600 001 2.The Inspector Tamilnadu Waqf Board Arani Road, Sainadhapuram Vellore 632 001 ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent herein to Consider the Representation dated 19.09.2024 within a stipulated period of time prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.SunilkumarFor Respondents : Mr.Mohamed Aseef.G Standing Counsel for WakfORDERBy consent of both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as respondents, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.2. The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 19.09.2024 within the time stipulated by this Court.3. According to the...
Mottaiyan vs Sub Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 2349 of 2025Mottaiyan ...Petitioner Vs. Sub Registrar, Poonamalee, Chennai 600 056. ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to furnish the certified copy of the document dated 17.09.1965 bearing Doc.No.2725 of 1965, registered on the file of the SRO, Poonamallee. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Balasubramanian For Respondents : Mr. M.Shahjahan Special Government Pleader.ORDERThe Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: To direct the 1st respondent to furnish the certified copy of the document dated 17.09.1965 bearing Doc.No.2725 of 1965, registered on the file of the SRO, Poonamallee.2. The petitioner is the absolute owner of the subject property andhe has been in continuous possession of the same. While so, one Ruby filed a suit against the petitioner for recovery of possession of the property on th...
Rishi vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 31.01.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN -- E.Rishi .. Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. byThe Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. Ramanatham, Cuddalore District. .. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanitha, 2023, praying to complete the investigation in the stipulated period of time fixed by this Court and file the final report in Crime No.47 of 2022 before the concerned Judicial Magistrate. For petitioner : Mr.S.Sivagurunathan For respondents: Mr.S.Sugendran, Addl.P.P. Page No.1/3ORDERThe petitioner has filed the present petition seeking to complete the investigation within the stipulated period of time that may be fixed by this Court and file the final report in Crime No.47 of 2022 before the concerned Judicial Magistrate.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondentssubmitted that the investigation in...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »