Chennai Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Paulson Yesudian and Another Vs. State represented by Inspector of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 11.10.2010 in CMP.Nos.184 and 186 of 2009 in CC.No.2 of 2008 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore.) Common Order: 1. Both the Criminal Revisions are directed against the order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore made in CMP.Nos.184 and 186 of 2009 in CC.No.2 of 2008 dated 11.10.2010, in dismissing the discharge petitions filed by the petitioners. 2. The case of the petitioners are that the first respondent/CBI has filed charge sheet against the petitioners under Section 120B r/w.406 IPC, Section 23(1) and 25 r/w. Section 4, 6 and 13 of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 1976. 3. The main allegations raised in the final report under Section 173 Cr.PC made by the CBI is that Reach in the Niligiris is a registered Society under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, the Society has been registered under Foreign Contribution ...
R. Gunasekaran Vs. The Appellate Authority/District Collector, Erode a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his Proceedings Na.Ka.71946/1995/Na6 dated 23.11.2015 and to quash the same as illegal and arbitrary.) Sanjay Kishan Kaul, C.J. 1. The present petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dated 23.11.2015 passed by the District Collector, Erode in respect of the proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (hereinafter referred to the said Act ). 2. The subject matter of land is S.F.No.1520/1 to the extent of 3.20 acres in Anthiyur Village and Taluk, Erode District, in respect of which, a notice was issued on 09.09.2015 under Section 7 of the said Act, which was assailed in W.P.No.30723 of 2015, followed by an order under Section 6 of the said Act dated 23.09.2015. 3. The land in question forms subje...
Rani Vs. The Secretary to Government, Home Prohibition and Excise Depa ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of detention passed by the second respondent, in Memo No.445/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 20.4.2016 and to set aside the same and consequently, to direct the second respondent to produce the detenu, V.Raji, son of Varadhan, petitioner's son, now detained in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Court and to set him at liberty, forthwith.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the mother of the detenu, namely, Raji, aged about 28 years, son of Varadhan, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records, in Detention Order No.445/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 20.4.2016, passed by the second respondent herein, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral...
IMC Ltd., rep. by its authorized signatory T.M. Balasubramanian Vs. Tu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Appeal suit is filed under Order XLI, Rule 1 of C.P.C. and under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 08.01.2008 made in O.S.No.13 of 2006 on the file of the District Judge/Fast Track Court No.II, Tuticorin.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. 1. This appeal suit is directed against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge/F.T.C.No.II, Tuticorin dated 08.01.200 in O.S.No.13 of 2006, dismissing the suit for recovery of sum of Rs.1,30,86,731/- with interest or for an alternative relief of specific performance. 2. The plaint averments are as follows: 2.1. The plaintiffs are carrying on business in handling liquid cargo by providing storage facilities in various Ports throughout India. In response to the tender notice dated 13.02.1998 of the defendant Port Trust as to the allotment of land on lease basis for creation of facilities like Warehouses, Tank Farms, Marine Workshop etc. the plaintiff submitted the tender for Tank Farms for stora...
S. Jeyaraman Vs. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thooth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in connection with the impugned order of suspension passed by him in Na.Ka.9892/2015 Tho.Ve.Koo.Sa. dated 09.12.2016 and quash the same as illegal and ultravires.) 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking to quash the impugned order of suspension passed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.9892/2015 Tho.Ve.Koo.Sa. dated 09.12.2016. 2. The case of the petitioner is that while he was serving as Secretary in the 3rd respondent society, an inspection was conducted based on a complaint that irregularities took place in Agricultural Loan Waiving Scheme in the society. In the inspection, it was found that the loan amount was waived for 19 survey numbers which were not found in the village records for the Fasli 1424 and 1425 and further there is no records showing cultivation of plantain in Saminatham and South Veerapandiapuram...
M/s. Sony India (P) Ltd. represented herein by its Branch Commercial M ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in the impugned order in TIN No.33650461357/ 2008-09, TIN No.33650461357/ 2015-16, TIN No.33650461357/ 2014-15 and TIN No.33650461357/ 2012-13 respectively, dated 27.12.2016, 23.12.2016, 23.12.2016 and 27.12.2016 respectively, and quash the same and further direct the Respondent to pass a fresh order accepting all the sales return / credit note documents, in the possession of the Petitioner.) Common Order: 1. Issue Notice. Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the learned counsels for parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2. The captioned writ petitions relate to the following assessment years: Sl.No.W.P.No.Assessment Year12852 of 20172008 0922853 of 20172015 1632854 of 20172014 1542855 of 20172012 13 3. Insofar as the W.P...
P.K. Selvaraj Vs. K. Kannan (died) and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 19.06.2006 and made in A.S.No.22 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Arni reversing the judgment and decree dated 17.01.2005 and made in O.S.No.339 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Polur.) 1. This Second Appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 19.06.2006 and made in A.S.No.22 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Arni reversing the judgment and decree dated 17.01.2005 and made in O.S.No.339 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Polur. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as per their rank and status shown in the original suit. 3. The appellant herein is the plaintiff in O.S.339/1988 filed for partition and separate possession. The respondents are his brother's legal heirs and sisters. The suit filed on the averment that the suit properties are the separate and self-acquired properties of one Kulanthaisamy, who is...
A. Rajangam Vs. V. Dhavamani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and decree dated 26.11.2010 made in A.S.No.26 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Cuddalore, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 07.08.2007 made in O.S.No.41 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore.) 1. Challenge in this second appeal is made by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 26.11.2010 made in A.S.No.26 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Cuddalore, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 07.08.2007 made in O.S.No.41 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore. 2. The second appeal has been admitted and the following substantial question of law is formulated for consideration in this second appeal: (i) Whether the judgment and decree of the Courts below in decreeing the suit in favour of the plaintiff are based upon the perverse findings and misdirected against the evidence on record...
S.R. Mohideen Abdul Khader Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by S ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order in O.Mu.No.2594/Aa4/2016 dated 21.07.2016 passed by the 3rd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the petitioner's appointment for the post of Junior Assistant in the 4th respondent school with effect from 02.05.2016 with all consequential benefits.) This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the 3rd respondent in O.Mu.No.2594/Aa4/2016 dated 21.07.2016 vide which, the 3rd respondent has returned the proposal, on the ground that approval could be considered after receiving the order from the Government on seniority basis. The petitioner also sought a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the petitioner's appointment for the post of Junior Assistant in the 4th respondent school with effect from 02.05.2016 with all consequenti...
Devaraji Vs. R. Lakshmikantham
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-03-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and decree dated 20.12.2010 made in A.S.No.3 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu, confirming judgment and decree dated 12.09.2008 made in O.S.No.9 of 2005 on the file of Sub Judge, Maduranthagam.) 1. Challenge in this second appeal is made by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2010 made in A.S.No.3 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Court, Chengalpattu, confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.09.2008 made in O.S.No.9 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Madhuranthagam. 2. The second appeal has been admitted and the following substantial question of law is formulated for consideration in this second appeal. Whether the judgment and decree of the Courts below in decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiff are based upon the perverse findings and also misdirected against the evidence on record? 3. The suit has been laid...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »