Chennai Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Herbert M. Daisy Vs. The Director of Elementary Education, D.P.I Campu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 20.08.2016 by considering her seniority and to direct the second respondent to transfer her from Pappakudi Union Primary School, Kathapuram, Tirunelveli District to any one of the schools having vacancy at Valliyoor Panchayat Union, Tirunelveli District.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed,for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 20.08.2016 by considering her seniority and to direct the second respondent to transfer her from Pappakudi Union Primary School, Kathapuram, Tirunelveli District to any one of the schools having vacancy at Valliyoor Panchayat Union, Tirunelveli District. 2. Heard Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition i...
P.Thiyagarajan Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbako ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus,directing the respondents to revise the Petitioner's pay in the post of Checking Inspector with retrospective effect from 1.9.2010 in terms of G.O.Ms.No.61, Transport (C)Department, dated 30.4.2015 and further to direct the respondents to pay him the difference amount in monthly pension, gratuity, leave salary, commuted value of pension and all other attendant benefits payable to him from 1.10.2016 till date, together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondents to revise the Petitioner's pay in the post of Checking Inspector with retrospective effect from 1.9.2010 in terms of G.O.Ms.No.61, Transport (C)Department, dated 30.4.2015 and further to direct the respondents to pay him the difference amount in monthly pension, gratuity, leave salary, commuted value of pension and all other attendant benefits...
M. Manimekalai, St.Gabriels Girls Higher Secondary School, Thanajavur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings dated 27.05.2016 in O.Mu.No.1687/A3/2016, on the file of the fourth respondent and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to accord approval to the appointment of the Petitioner Mrs.M.Manimekalai, working as Scavenger(part-time) in St.Gabriels Girls Higher Secondary School, Pasupathikoil, Thanajavur District 614 206, w.e.f.1.4.2016 with all monetary and other service benefits.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the fourth respondent,dated 27.05.2016 in O.Mu.No.1687/A3/2016, on the file of the fourth respondent and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to accord approval to the appointment of the Petitioner in St.Gabriels Girls Higher Secondary School, Pasupathikoil, Thanajavur District 614 206, w.e.f.1.4.2016 with all monetary and oth...
RM. Chockalingam Ambalam Vs. S.M.M.PR. Ramaswamy Ambalam (Died) and Ot ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree, dated 29.01.1993, made in A.S.No.69 of 1991, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai, setting aside the Judgment and Decree, dated 30.09.1991, made in O.S.No.106 of 1988, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Devakottai, dismissing the suit the rein.) 1. The unsuccessful plaintiff is the appellant herein. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the ranking before the Trial Court. 3. The plaintiff filed the suit, in O.S.No.106 of 1988, before the learned District Munsif, Devakottai, for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property to an extent of 28 Cents in Survey No.68 in Kalanivasal Pudur Village. 4. After contest, the learned District Munsif, Devakottai, by Judgment and Decree, dated 30.09.1991, decreed the suit. 5. Aggrieved by the Judgment and...
Jalaja Kumari and Others Vs. Thayarammal (deceased) and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the Additional Subordinate Judge Court at Chenglepet dated 03.08.2010 passed in A.S.No.63 of 2006 reversing the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court at Chenglepet dated 20.04.2006 in O.S.No.160 of 1997.) 1. Challenge in this second appeal is made by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 03.08.2010 passed in A.S.No.63 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Chenglepet reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2006 made in O.S.No.160 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chenglepet. 2. The suit has been laid by the plaintiff for declaration and permanent injunction. 3. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is as follows: The plaintiff purchased Inam Punjai Survey No.50/1 of an extent of 0.04 cents from one Kannammal under a registered sale deed dated 11.09.1959. On the northern side of the said property an extent of 0.18 ...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
1. Heard Mr.I.C.Vasudevan, Learned counsel for the Petitioner/ Appellant and Mr.R.Ravichandran, Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the Respondent/Complainant. 2. The Petitioner/Appellant/Accused has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal No.5 of 2017 before this Court (as an aggrieved person) as against the Judgment dated 19.12.2016 in S.C.No.54 of 2016 passed by the Learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode. 3. The trial Court had found the Petitioner/Appellant/Accused guilty in respect of an offence under Section 304(ii) I.P.C. and accordingly, imposed a punishment of Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of five years with a fine of Rs.4,000/-, in default of payment of fine, a default sentence of Simple Imprisonment for a period of one year was also imposed. In fact, the trial Court had categorically observed in its Judgment that the deceased was of 70 years old and she was standing by catching the iron rod (stabled in the earth) and at that...
B. Janakiram and Others Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secret ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed against the order dated 17.04.2012 in W.P.No.23476 of 2008. Review Applications filed under Order 47 Rule (1) and (2) read with Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, to review the common orders made in W.A.Nos.1103 and 1104 of 2009 dated 25.09.2008.) Common Order: S. Manikumar, J. 1. W.P.No.8801 of 2008 has been filed by Periyar District Cooperative Land Development Bank Employee's Union, represented by its General Secretary, Erode District for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to quash G.O. Ms. No. 186 Co-operation Food and Consumer Protection Department dated 16.08.2000 and consequently, the said Union has prayed for a direction to respondents therein, to allow the salary and other allowances including terminal benefits in terms of the concluded settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. 2. W.P.No.8826 of 2008 has been filed by K.Selvaraj and two others for a similar prayer, to quash the said Government Order and the consequential o...
M. Saraswathy, President, Narasingapuram Village Panchayat, Vellore Di ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 6.10.2016 rendered in W.P.No.8151 of 2016.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This Writ Appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, has been preferred by the writ petitioner, aggrieved by the dismissal of the writ petition instituted by her. 2. The writ petition is instituted calling in question the correctness of the order passed on 11th February 2016, by the Personal Assistant to District Collector (Development) accommodating the fourth respondent as Panchayat Secretary of Narasingapuram Village Panchayat, Wallajah Panchayat Union, Vellore District. The writ petitioner/appellant is the elected President of the said Narasingapuram Village Panchayat and consequently, she is the Executive Authority of the said Panchayat. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant would contend that contrary to the scheme of statutory provisions governing the Village Panchayat Secretaries viz., the Tamil Nadu Village Panc...
V. Sambandan Vs. The Punjab National Bank Rep. by its Chairman cum Man ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the writ court dated 28.10.2009 made in W.P.No.19557 of 2009.) S. Manikumar, J. Challenge in this appeal is to an order made in W.P.No.19557 of 2009 dated 28.10.2009, by which, the writ court, declined to issue a mandamus, directing the Authorised Officer and Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank, Chennai, to return a sum of Rs.3,30,000/- deposited by the appellant with the bank on 17.07.2009. 2. Facts leading to the appeal are that, pursuant to an auction notice issued by the bank dated 07.06.2009, the appellant desired to purchase property comprised in Survey No.375/3 bearing Plot No.9, situated at Kalaimagal Nagar in Mangadu Village, Chennai - 101. Reserve price was fixed as Rs.13,00,000/-. EMD was fixed as Rs.1,30,000/-. The appellant paid a sum of Rs.3,30,000/- by way of three demand drafts to the Authorised Officer and Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank, Chennai/respondent No.2. 3. The appellant ...
J.D. Shanthi (deceased) and Others Vs. M.L. Perumal and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
(Prayer: Original Petition No 583 of 1993 was filed under Sections 232 and 276 of Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925 for the grant of letters of Administration. Against this petition a Caveat was filed on by the Caveators As per order of this Court, the Original Petition No.583 of 1993 was converted into Testamentary Original Suit No.35 of 1993.) 1. The petition originally filed for the grant of Letters of Administration has been converted as suit in view of the caveat filed by the defendants herein. 2. he brief facts of the case of the plaintiffs are as follows:- (i) The 1st and 2nd plaintiffs are the daughters and 3rd and 4th plaintiffs are the sons of one Chandra Ammal @ Chandra Bai, who is the 1st daughter of the deceased K.R.Lokiah Naidu. 1st respondent is the brother of the said Chandra Ammal @ Chandra Bai and one Mrs. Govindammal and son of the said deceased K.R.Lokiah Naidu. The 2nd respondent is the son, 3rd respondent is the daughter respectively of one Mrs. Govindammal, wh...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »