Chennai Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J. Shamlal Vs. G. Manoharan, Proprietor, M/s. S.D.M. and Co., Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-2017
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to set aside the Judgment passed against the Appellant on 06.09.2013 in C.C.No.3331 of 2010 on the file of the Learned IV Fast Track Court, George Town, Chennai and convict the respondent for the offence under Section 138 r/w.142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.) 1. The Appellant/Complainant has focused the instant Criminal Appeal before this Court as against the Judgment dated 06.09.2013 in C.C.No.3331 of 2010 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, (Fast Track Court No.IV), George Town, Chennai. 2. The Learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court No.IV), George Town, Chennai, while passing the impugned Judgment in C.C.No.3331 of 2010 dated 06.09.2013, at paragraph 14, had, inter alia, observed that '... the afore-stated financiers were not examined in the case to prove the debt amount to be paid by the Respondent to the financiers', further the said financiers details were not informed on behalf ...
Chinna Lagumappa Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Begalaur Circle ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-2017
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., to set aside the judgment made in S.C.No.77 of 2006, on the file of Assistant Sessions Court, Hosur, dated 17.09.2012, convicting the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and also pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.) 1. The Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment made in S.C.No.77 of 2006, on the file of Assistant Sessions Court, Hosur, dated 17.09.2012, convicting the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and also pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the victim girl, Uma is the daughter of one Lakshmiammal, the resident of Ungatti Village. The victim girl was aged about 9 years at the time of occurrence in the year 2001. On 28.06.2001 when she was returning from her school along with Praveen and Suresh, who also belonging to her vil...
A. Purusothaman Vs. The Junior Engineer TANGEDCO Thirupadiripuliyur an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith accept the application and extend Domestic Electricity Supply to the petitioner's premises at No.2, Mettu Street, Suranayakkansavadi, Cuddalore-2, as per Tamil Nadu Electricity Code and Regulations and that of the Terms and Conditions of Supply of Electricity without insisting upon the No Objection Certificate.) 1. The petitioner is a permanent resident of No.2, Mettu Street, Suranayakkansavadi, Cuddalore and the said property belongs to the petitioner's parents, who were blessed with ten children. As the petitioner's family is a Hindu Undivided Family, a civil dispute with regard to the partition of the said property is under the active consideration. But after the demise of the petitioner's parents, namely, late A.Arumugam and late Tmt.Gnanam, he has constructed a portion on the first floor with proper approval and acknowledgmen...
Sanga Pillai and Another Vs. Mariyayee Ammal
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., against the fair and decretal order, dated 11.10.2013, passed in I.A.No.162 of 2010 in I.A.No.355 of 2007 in O.S.No.250 of 2000, by the learned District Munsif, Vedasandur.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order, dated 11.10.2013, passed in I.A.No.162 of 2010 in I.A.No.355 of 2007 in O.S.No.250 of 2000, by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur. 2. Facts of the case: (i) The petitioners are the defendants 1 and 3. The respondent is the plaintiff and she filed the suit in O.S.No.250 of 2000, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Vedasandur, for partition. (ii) The petitioners entered appearance through Advocate and subsequently, they did not file written statement and contest the suit. Therefore, an ex-parte preliminary decree was passed on 06.12.2001. (iii) The respondent filed I.A.No.251 of 2005 for passing of final decre...
Muniappan @ Chinnakilladi Vs. State: Represented by Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant by the judgment dated 05.01.2016 passed in S.C.No.233 of 2014, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.233 of 2014 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri. He stood charged for an offence under Section 302 I.P.C. By judgment dated 05.01.2016, the trial Court convicted and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 302 I.P.C. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- [a] The deceased in this case was one Mr.Marappan. The accused is his brother. For quite some time, there was a misunderstanding betwee...
L. Puvanesh and Others Vs. The Tamilnadu State Transport, Corporation ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the entire eligible terminal benefits payable to the petitioner including Gratuity and Terminal Leave Salary together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till the date of payment within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. The petitioner was employed as Senior Conductor in the respondent Corporation and he retired from service on 30.04.2015 on attaining the age of superannuation. 2. He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondent to pay the retirement benefits. 3. The First Bench of this Court in similar matter has passed an order dated 12.06.2015 in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, issuing direction to the transport Corporations to settle the terminal benefits of its employees in equal monthly instalments and to pay 6% interest on the terminal benefits p...
A. Christhuraj, St.Gabriels Girls Higher Secondary School, Thanajavur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings dated 10.05.2016 in O.Mu.No.1454/A3/2016, on the file of the fourth respondent and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to accord approval to the appointment of the Petitioner A.Christhuraj, working as Watchman in St.Gabriels Girls Higher Secondary School, Pasupathikoil, Thanajavur District 614 206, w.e.f.1.4.2016 with all monetary and other service benefits.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the fourth respondent,dated10.05.2016 in O.Mu.No.1454/A3/2016, on the file of the fourth respondent and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to accord approval to the appointment of the Petitioner A.Christhuraj, working as Watchman in St.Gabriels Girls Higher Secondary School, Pasupathikoil, Thanajavur District 614 206, w.e.f.1.4.2016 with al...
M/s. Bharathi Builders and Constructions, Represented by S. Aravindaks ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in Recovery Order No.C.No.V/MRS/15/32/2012 dated 28.10.2016 on the file of the respondent and quashing the same and consequently direct the respondent to pass an appropriate order after the disposal of the application in Diary Number 411882016 dated 11.11.2016 by the CESTAT.) 1. Issue notice. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2. By virtue of this writ petition, a direction is sought for quashing the recovery order, dated 28.10.2016, and for a consequential direction for consideration, of its application, dated 11.11.2016, pending before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short CESTAT ). 3. The brief facts, which are required to be noticed for consider...
S. Saibulla Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to select the petitioner who had scored 223.50 marks being the cut off mark, for an appointment as Assistant in the combined sub-ordinate services examination 2009-2011 conducted by the respondent under Backward Class Muslim General quota since candidates those who had scored lesser marks are selected by the respondent under Backward Class Muslim General quota, (BCMG quota).) 1. Heard Mr.S.Selvathirumurugan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.M.Loganathan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the Government of Tamil Nadu had called upon eligible candidates for direct recruitment to various posts in Combined Subordinate Services Examination. The competitive examination for filling up the posts consisted of written examination and oral test. The petitioner bearing Registration ...
T. Srinivasan Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Lim ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,directing the respondents to pay the terminal benefits amount payable to the petitioner including Gratuity, Un-availed Leave Salary, Service Surrender Leave Salary, Post Retirement Scheme amount and Dearness Allowance arrears together with 18% interest from the date of his retirement I.e., 31.10.2012 to till the date of payment and also 18% interest for the belated payment of Commuted value of Pension and all other attendant benefits to him within the stipulated period fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was employed as Assistant Manager in the respondents Corporation and he retired from service on 31.10.2012 on attaining the age of superannuation. 2. He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits. 3. The First Bench of this Court in similar matter has passed an order dated 12.06.2015 in W.A.(MD) Nos.38...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »