Chennai Court September 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Shreyas, a Partnership Firm and Others Vs. The Authorised Officer ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari, to call for the records, pertaining to order, dated 26.08.2016, made in A.I.R.(SA) 707 of 2015, on the file of the 4th respondent and quash the same.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. The order impugned in this writ petition, dated 26.08.2016, reads as follows: "Heard the learned counsels for the parties in the waiver application. The appellants have preferred the present appeal under Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, against the order, dated 25.08.2015, passed by the DRT, Ernakulam, wherein the I.A.No.1134/2014, filed by the appellants in S.A.No.450 of 2012, was dismissed. The appellants have been served a demand notice dated 14.11.2011 under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, wherein the respondent-Bank has demanded a sum of Rs.2,63,30,093/- along with interest. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are ready and willing to deposit 25% of the demand rai...
Tamilnadu Post Graduate Teachers Association Represented by the Presid ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus to directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.08.2016 in the light of the recommendation made by the 2nd respondent by its proceedings No:Na Ka No.34155/K/E1/2011 dated.20.05.2011.) 1. The writ petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.08.2016 in the light of the recommendation made by the 2nd respondent by its proceedings No:Na Ka No.34155/K/E1/2011 dated.20.05.2011. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. The case of the petitioner Association (hereinafter referred to as the Association ) is that it was a registered Association bearing Reg.No.10 of 1978 and it was formed with an object of uplifting the welfare of the members of the Association; that the Post Graduate teachers, who obtained degree in M.Ed / M.Phil / Ph.D / PGDTE were entitled to incen...
R. Madhan Kumar Vs. The Additional Director, Land Survey and Records D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned orders of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/2365/2012 dated 27.12.2014 and Na.Ka.No.A3/602/2016(1) dated 11.05.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to provide employment to the petitioner on compassionate ground.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the 2nd respondent dated 27.12.2014 passed in Na.Ka.No.A1/2365/2012, by which it was informed to the petitioner that it is not possible for the respondents to forward the application for appointment on compassionate ground, as he did not complete the age of 18 years on the said date; the petitioner also seeks to quash the consequential order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.A3/602/2016(1) dated 11.05.2016, rejecting the request of the petitioner reiterating the same ground. In addition, the petitioner sought direc...
T. Rajam @ Kaveri Kutty Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. By its ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 10.08.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 7695 of 2015.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. This writ appeal arises out of the order passed by the learned single Judge, whereby learned single Judge dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein upholding the order passed by the Government in respect of the vesting of lands to the share of the respective respondents. 2. An abstract outline of the facts, which led to the filing of the writ appeal is outlined hereunder :- The lands, bearing Survey No.164/1, which is the subject matter of the present appeal, of an extent of 5 acres, situated in Thazhambur Village, Kelambakkam Firca, which is a portion out of the 600 acres of lands purchased by one Perumalsamy Reddy in a Court auction sale during the year 1929, stood vested with the Government under the Tamil Nadu Estate Abolition Act, 1948 (Act 26 of 1948). By virtue of the Settlement Pro...
S. Harshavardhan Reddy and Others Vs. State rep. by The Additional Sup ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.15007 of 2008 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and to quash the same.) 1. The petitioner has preferred the instant Crl.O.P.No.6029 of 2012 in calling for the records in C.C.No.15007 of 2008 from the file of the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and to quash the same. 2. Heard the Learned counsel for the Petitioners/Accused 1, 2, 3 and 5 and the Learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases appearing on behalf of the First Respondent as well as the Learned counsel for the Second Respondent. 3. According to the Petitioners, the First Respondent/State led by the Additional Superintendent of Police, CBI, BS and FC, Bangalore had lodged a complaint in C.C.No.15007 of 2008 against them before the Learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai in respect of the alleged offences und...
The Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited. Vs. Chinna ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the decree and judgment dated 20.10.2011, made in MCOP.No.19 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge, Bhavani.) 1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2011, made in MCOP.No.19 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge, Bhavani, in and by which, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.1,33,500/- as against the claim of Rs.4,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by the claimant/first respondent herein. 2. On 22.03.2008 at about 2.00 p.m., while the claimant was proceeding on Bhavani to Anthiyur main road on the extreme left side of the road, a TVS Champ bearing Registration No.TN-36-W-0262 driven by the second respondent herein in a rash and negligent manner, hit against the claimant, as a result, the claimant sustained grievous injuries. Immediately, she was taken to the Trust Hospital, Erode, where she t...
S. Krishnakumar Vs. The Divisional Engineer, Highways (Construction an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to include the petitioner's name in the Seniority list for the post of Road Inspector Grade-II in the respondent Department on the basis of the Petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2015 within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondent to include the petitioner's name in the Seniority list for the post of Road Inspector Grade-II in the respondent Department on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3.The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Gang Mazdoor by the Divisional Engineer Highways, (Construction and Maintenance) Department, Pudukkottai on 19.11.1997; that his services were regularized on 21.11.1998 and he has completed hi...
M. Aamira Fathima and Others Vs. The Annamalai University, Cuddalore D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayers: Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 02.12.2014 made in W.P.No.20720 of 2014 on the file of this Court. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order of Syndicate Resolution No.11 dated 21.3.2014 passed by the fourth respondent and that of the clause in the prospectus prescribing more fees than the fees prescribed in the Government Colleges, as impermissible, and to quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to extend study leave and salary/stipend equivalent to the Government salary insofar as the service candidates are concerned and to extend all benefits arising thereto.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. The writ appeals are directed against the common order dated 02.12.2014 dismissing W.P.Nos.20720 and 22305 of 2014. 2. W.P.Nos.6909 and 6910 of 2015 have been filed by the students who are pursuing PG Course in Raja Muthiah Medic...
The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Health and Family W ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 23.11.2015 passed in W.P.No.17231 of 2015 on the file of this court.) Huluvadi G.Ramesh, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The writ appeal is filed challenging the order of the learned Single Judge dated 23.11.2015 passed in W.P.No.17231 of 2015 whereby the first respondent herein, being a Dental Student of fourth respondent herein, was granted the relief of transfer to any one of Government Dental Colleges at Chennai. 3. The case of the writ petitioner/first respondent herein is that he had applied for MBBS/BDS admission in the year 2014, and he had secured 195 marks and he was allotted 5753 rank. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he is eligible to get a seat in Government Dental College, he was offered a seat only in a private college which was only due to improper selection procedure adopted by the respondents and hence, he sought for migration/tran...
A.P.I.Mohideen Vs. The Assistant Engineer, Distribution Rural TANGEDCO ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from disconnecting the electricity service connection in consumer No.07081011827 without following due process of law.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to forbear the respondent from disconnecting the electricity service connection in consumer No.07081011827 without following due process of law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3.The case of the petitioner is that he applied for service connection under Low Tension Tariff-V, which is higher than the Tariff-IV; that he is using electricity for agricultural and poultry product purposes for the past two years; that the respondent inspected the service connection during the last week of June, 2016 and informed that he should not use the connection for pumping water and it should be used only for construction wo...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »