Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.M. Abdul Hakim @ Gym Hakim Vs. State by, The Inspector of Police, Co ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Coimbatore, made in S.C.No.214 of 2009 dated 23.09.2014.) S. Nagamuthu, J. The appellant is the 1st accused in S.C.No.214 of 2009 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Coimbatore. There were totally seven accused in this case. The 7th accused Mr.Anandaraj absconded during trial. Therefore, the case against him was split up and tried separately. Thus, the appellant herein and the accused 2 to 6 faced the trial. The Trial Court framed as many as 7 charges against the accused Nos.1 to 6, as detailed below :- ad>Sl.No.Charge NumberRank of AccusedPenal Provision1Charge No.1Accused Nos. 1 to 6147, 148, 366 IPC2Charge No.2Accused Nos.1, 2 and 4-Accused Nos.3, 5 and 6343, 392 read with 397 IPC --343, 393 r/w.397 r/w.109 IPC3Charge No.3Accused No.1 andAccused Nos.2 to 6354 and 506(i) IPC354, 506(i) r/w.109 IPC4Charge No.4Accus...
Annai Veilakannis Pharmacy College Vs. The Chairman, rep.by its adviso ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayers in WP.No.19870/2014: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order of the 1st respondent in F.No.2-OC/Misc/SRO/AB [1-45693811] dated 16.06.2014 and quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to conduct necessary inspection and pass orders regarding the continuation of recognition to the petitioner Institution M/s.Annai Veilankanni Pharmacy College. WP.No.15231/2015: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondents relating to the order of the 1st respondent F.No.Southern/1-2479984919/2015/LOR-Chapter 2 dated 07.04.2015 and F.No.2-OC/Misc/SRO/AB [1-45693811] dated 30.04.2015 and quash the same and directing the 1st respondent to grant Extension of Approval to the petitioner College from all the existing courses for the academic year 2015-16 in v...
Mohanraj Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, Ammapet Police Station, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer:Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Fast track Court, Erode in S.C.No.158 of 2015 dated 17.02.2016.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.158 of 2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Fast Track Court, Erode. He stood charged for offences under Sections 450, 307(Part 2) and 354 I.P.C. By judgment dated 17.02.2016, the trial Court acquitted him from the charge under Section 354 I.P.C. and convicted him under Sections 450 and 307(Part 2) I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two years for offence under Section 450 I.P.C. and to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two years for the offence under Section 307 (Part 2) I.P.C. Challenging the said conviction and sentenc...
M/s. Karandhai Tamil Sangam, represented by its Secretary and Others V ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Appeal against the order passed this Court in W.P.(MD) No.11820 of 2014 dated 11.09.2014.Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Appeal against the order passed this Court in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 in W.P.S.R.(MD) No. 61985 of 2014 dated 13.10.2014. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents, their men, 5 agents and officials from conducting any enquiry in respect of the similar nature of complaints which were already dropped by the fourth respondent by his report in Na.Ka.No.4731/A2/2011 dated 23.12.2011 on the complaint of P.Neela dated 13.11.2011 and the report dated 13.12.2011 in Na.Ka.No. 4732/A2/2011 on the complaint of G.Rathnakumar, dated 14.11.2011 and the report dated 13.12.2011 in Na.Ka.No.4752/A2/2011 on the complaint of R.Sivaprakasam dated 09.11.2011 also on the basis of the order passed by the fourth respon...
S.M. Kamaraj Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanyakumari District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to release the petitioner's Taurus Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-74-V-5216.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. 4. According to the petitioner, he is the owner of Taurus Lorry bearing registration No.TN-74-V-5216. He purchased the said vehicle under hypothecation Finance and plying his lorry without any deviation from the transport permit. Out of the income derived from this vehicle, he is running his family and it is the only source of income for him and the whole family. Furthermore, he obtained a valid transport permit with insurance and he is plying his vehicle for the past 10 years without any deviation or violation. Therefore, the Government Construction Contractors used to engage his lorry for transporting river sand and oth...
K. Balasubramanian Vs. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, E ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to disburse the terminal benefits of the petitioners father viz.difference in DCRG, difference in commuted value of pension, pension arrears from the period from 01.01.2007 to 24.11.2010, the pension amount for the month of November 2010 and family welfare fund authorized by the 2nd respondent in proceedings No.Nee.Mu.No.46062/NaOsa(3)/2009 dated 14.09.2010 and based on the proposal sent by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.678/2016/H1, dated 11.02.2016.) 1. Mr.K.Balasubramanian, son of Late.Kumaravel, has come to this Court seeking the terminal benefits of his father. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the his father was working as Office Assistant and retired from service, peacefully, on attaining the age of superannuation. Subsequently, the terminal benefits such as DCRG, commuted value of pension and other benefits, were given to the p...
M. Muniyammal Vs. The State represented by the Home Secretary, The Gov ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to allow the petitioners brother (Namely Marimuthu aged about 45 years) Life convict No.4066 to grant free ordinary leave or free emergency leave or free medical leave or prisoners childrens education leave or prisoners mothers death emergency leave any one of them may be granted for the period of 5 weeks from the dated on 02.08.2016 as request as per the representation of the petitioner dated 27.07.2016.) 1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner's brother, namely, Marimuthu aged about 45 years (Life Convict No.4066) to go on either under free ordinary leave or free emergency leave or free medical leave or prisoner children's education leave or emergency leave for the death of prisoner's mother for five weeks starting from 02.08.2016 on the basis of the representation...
Kavitha Vs. State represented by its Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 (2) Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Fast Track Court, Dharmapuri, in S.C.No.196 of 2014 on 09.12.2015.) V. Bharathidasan, J. 1. A2, in S.C.No.196 of 2014 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Fast Track Court, Dharmapuri, is the appellant herein. Totally there are two accused. A1 stood charged for offences under Sections 120(b), 302 and 201 IPC and the appellant / A2 stood charged for offences under Sections 120(b), 302 r/w.109 IPC. The trial Court convicted appellant / A2 under Section 120 (b) IPC and sentenced her to undergo life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment and convicted under Section 302 r/w.109 IPC and sentenced her to undergo life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. The trial Court directed the sentences to run concurrently. Challenging the ab...
Seahujahuna Vs. The Branch Manager, UCO Bank, Sivagangai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to sanction the education loan of Rs.1,71,150/- to petitioner's son for the year of 2015 - 16 and all other continuous academic years.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the petitioner, she belongs to a backward class community and hails from a poor family. Her husband was working as a labour in Dubai and returned to India on 25.07.2016 (as informed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner before this Court). Her son Mohamed Rejas completed his +2 studies in Kendra Vidhyalaya Higher Secondary School, Sivagangai during the academic year 2014-2015 and secured 82.87% and after school studies, his son participated in the joint entrance examination (Advanced 2015) conducted by the Indian Institute of Technology and he passed the said examination on merits. Later, he was sp...
M/s. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. represented by its Associate Gen ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.9744 of 2010 dated 29.04.2011. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records connected with show cause notice No.12/2015 dated 13.01.2015 issued under reference C.No.VIII/48/61/2013-SIIB on the file of the second respondent herein and quash the same.) Common Judgment C.T. Selvam, J. 1. Since the parties and issues involved are one and the same, the present writ appeal and writ petition are heard together and disposed by this common judgment. 2. The Commissioner of Customs (Tuticorin) vide proceedings C.No.VIII/48/61/2013-SIIB dated 13.01.2015 alleged misuse of advance licence/advance authorisation scheme by M/s.Sterlite Industries India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'), the petitioner in W.P.(MD) No. 626 of 2015 between the period February 2005 and May 2010 and cons...
- ‹ Prev
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 86
- Next ›
- Last »