Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
John Gnanaraj Vs. State rep by, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Villupur ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the Special Court (Principle Sessions Court), Villupuram in S.C.No.46 of 2011 dated 07.03.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.46 of 2011 on the file of the Special Court (Principal Sessions Court), Villupuram. He stood charged for offences under Section 417 I.P.C. and Section 376 I.P.C. r/w Section 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. By judgment dated 07.03.2015, the trial Court convicted him under all the charges and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for offence under Section 417 I.P.C. and to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 376 I.P.C. r/w Section 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Challenging the ...
Kaleeswari Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Anamalai Police Stati ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 (2) Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence imposed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, in S.C.No.318 of 2012 on 21.12.2015.) V. Bharathidasan, J. 1. The sole accused in S.C.No.318 of 2012 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, is the appellant herein. She stood charged for an offence under Section 302 IPC. The trial Court found her guilty of the offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced her to undergo life imprisonment and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo three months rigorous imprisonment. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this Appeal. 2. The prosecution case in brief, is as follows:- (a) The deceased in this case was a child by name Sounderarajan. The accused is the mother of deceased. PW.1 is the husband of the accused. (b) On 18.12.2010 at about 1.15 p.m, PW.8 , one Kavitha, neig...
Tvl Vantage Leathers India (P) Ltd., Chennai Vs. The State of Tamil Na ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to orders passed by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings in SR Sl.Nos. 459/2010-2011 and 482/2010-2011, dated 28.06.2016 and 30.06.2016 respectively received by the petitioner on 02.07.2016 and quash the same and to direct the 3rd respondent to afford an opportunity of personal hearing and pass fresh orders after giving effect to the orders of the Appellate Authority i.e., the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (C.T)-III, Chennai, as ordered in AP 17/2001, dated 20.08.2002 and AP 147/2002, 03.10.2002 respectively, by the 4th respondent.) Common Order 1. Heard Mr.M.MD.Ibrahim Ali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepting notice on behalf of the respondents and with the consent of learned counsel appearing on either side, these Writ Petitions are taken up ...
The Union of India rep. by Assistant General Manager (Per-IV) Bharat S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorari calling for the Article 226 records of the second respondent-Tribunal in O.A.No.1533 of 2013 dated 01-02-2016 and quash the same.) 1. This writ petition has been directed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the order, dated 01-02-2016, passed in O.A.No.1533 of 2013 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench and quash the same. 2. The first respondent herein as petitioner has filed O.A.No.783 of 2010 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench wherein the present petitioners have been shown as respondents. 3. It is averred in the petition that the father of the petitioner has served as a Phone-mechanic in BSNL and he passed away on 09-01-2005 leaving behind him, his wife, two daughters and two sons including the present petitioner. Under the said circumstances, the petitioner has applied for getting appointment...
Packiya Selvi and Another Vs. Anitha Agnihotri, Secretary Government o ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Common Prayer:Contempt Petitions filed to initiate Contempt Proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 against the respondents No.1 and 2 herein for his wilful disobedience to implement the orders passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.16364 of 2015, and W.P(MD)No.16735 of 2016 respectively, dated 9.9.2015 and to punish them.) Common Order 1. It is represented on behalf of the Respondents/Contemnors that a sum of Rs.10 Lakhs was paid to the Petitioners and this fact is not disputed on behalf of the Petitioners. Also, on behalf of the Petitioners, in the Contempt Petitions, endorsements were made to the effect that the Contempt Petitions are withdrawn. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsements so made, the Contempt Petitions stands dismissed as withdrawn....
R. Govindaraj Vs. Selvam and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of acquittal passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Villupuram, Tindivanam, made in S.C.No.102 of 2013 dated 01.12.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. This is an appeal against acquittal of the respondents 1 to 11. The respondents 1 to 11 were accused in S.C.No.102 of 2013 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam at Villupuram District. The final report was filed by the 12th respondent. The respondents 1 to 11 stood charged for offences under various penal provisions as detailed below: ad>Sl.No.Charge NumberRank of AccusedPenal Provision1Charge No.1Accused Nos. 1, 2 and 6148 of IPC2Charge No.2Accused Nos.3 to 5 and 7 to 11147 of IPC3Charge No.3Accused Nos.1 to 11294-b of IPC4Charge No.4Accused Nos.1 and 2324 of IPC5Charge No.5Accused Nos.1 to 11506(ii) of IPC6Charge No.6Accused Nos.3 to 5 and 9 to 11341 of IPC7Charge No.7Accused Nos.1, 2, 6 and 7302 r/w.34 of IPC By judg...
Kalimuthu Vs. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Thalaiyamangalam ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer; Criminal Appeal filed under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. challenging order of acquittal recorded by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur, in S.C.No.19 of 2012 dated 25.11.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. This is an appeal against acquittal. The respondents 2 to 6 herein are the accused in S.C.No.19 of 2012 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur. The 1st respondent is the complainant in the said case. There was yet another accused by name Mr.Vinoth, who was a juvenile in conflict with law. Therefore, case against him was separately dealt with. The respondents 2 to 5 stood charged for the offence as detailed below:- ad>Charge Number(s)Charges framed againstCharges framed under1A1Section 294(b) of IPC2A1 to A5Section 148 of IPC3A1, A3 and A5Section 323 of IPC4A2Section 324 of IPC [Two counts]5A4Section 324 of IPC6A1 to A5under Section 302 r/w 149 of IPC The trial court, by judgement dated 25.11.2013, acquitted the respondents 2 to 6/A1 to A5 from all the ...
Dr. N. Austin John Manohar, Kanyakumari District Vs. The Director of C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mamdamus directing the 1st respondent herein to approve and regularize the petitioner's appointment as Assistant Professor in History in the Nesamony Memorial Christian College, Marthandam in the sanctioned retirement vacancy of Dr.V.Ebanisor with effect from 16.06.2005 to 06.07.2014 in the light of the approval given by the 1st Respondent to the similarly placed persons in Na.Ka.No.4593/F2/2016 dated 15.04.2016, Na.Ka.No.19837/F2/2007 dated 14.03.2014 and Na.Ka.No.33733/F2/2005 dated 01.09.2014 in W.P.No.17368 of 2005 dated 29.06.2005, W.A.Nos.140, 811 of 2006 and 809 of 2007 dated 21.10.2010 and in SLP.No.19526 to 19528 of 2013, dated 29.11.2013 with monetary and service and all other benefits for the said period based on the representation dated 18.08.2015 given by the petitioner.) 1. Heard Mr.E.Martin Jayakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.S.Gunasekaran, lear...
Ajija Banu Vs. Vadivambal and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgement and Decree dated 28.10.2002 passed in A.S.No.113 of 2001, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 02.02.2001 passed in O.S.No.81 of 2000 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Melur.) 1. The plaintiff, who last the legal battle before both the Courts below, has come forward with this Second Appeal challenging the Judgement and Decree dated 28.10.2002, passed in A.S.No.113 of 2001, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai, by confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 02.02.2001, passed in O.S.No.81 of 2000, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Melur. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record. 3. The appellant, as a plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.81 of 2000 for declaration of title and injun...
R. Sampathkumar Vs. The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second Respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 23.07.2016 with regard to transfer from Ittamozhi Government Higher Secondary School, Tirunelveli to Government Higher Secondary School, Munneer Pallam, Tirunelveli in the General Transfer Counselling schedule to be held on 06.08.2016.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by R.Sampathkumar, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second Respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 23.07.2016 with regard to transfer from Ittamozhi Government Higher Secondary School, Tirunelveli to Government Higher Secondary School, Munneer Pallam, Tirunelveli in the General Transfer Counselling schedule to be held on 06.08.2016. 2. Mr.R.Sampathkumar, working as Head Master at A.V.J. Government High School, Itta Mozhi, Tirunelveli District h...
- ‹ Prev
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- Next ›
- Last »