Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Venkatesh Reddy Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Bagalur Police S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur, made in S.C.No.54/2011 dated 23.09.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. The appellant Venkatesh Reddy has come up with this Criminal Appeal, challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur, Krishnagiri District in S.C.No.54/2011, wherein the trial court has convicted him for offences under Sections 454 and 302 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 years for the offence under Section 302 of IPC and no separate sentence was imposed for the offence under Section 454 of IPC. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.03.2010 at 9.30 a.m. due to a quarrel with the deceased, the accused trespassed into the house of the deceased and caused extensive cut injuries on the body of the de...
Mahaveer Jainkalyan Sangh Vs. The Special Thasildar (ULT) and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records culminated in Letter C1/12473/2000, dated __03.2005 of the Special Thasildar (ULT), Fort-Tondiarpet Taluk, Chennai-3, the first respondent herein and quash the said letter.) 1. Heard Mr.Adeesh Anto, for Mr.Sivam Sivanandaraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.Vasuda Thiagarajan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging a demand issued by the first respondent, calling upon the petitioner to pay the Urban Land Tax for the Falsi from 1401 to 1414. 3. The reason assigned in the impugned communication is that the petitioner has not obtained any exemption under Section 27(h) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and therefore, they are duty bound to pay tax to the Government. 4. The petitioner is an Educational...
Commissioner of Income Tax Salem Vs. The Salem Agricultural Producers ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 30/6/2014 in ITA No.732/Mds/2014.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this Tax Appeal, is to an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A.No.732/Mds/2014, dated 30/6/2014, for the assessment year 2010 2011. 2. In the instant Tax Case Appeal, the appellant has raised the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is to be treated as primary agricultural society and is carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members and is entitled for deduction under Section 80 P (2) (a) (i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with respect to the interest received from Class B members who were involved in nonagricultural society? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Trib...
Tamilselvi Vs. State represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Theni Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.3883 of 2016 in C.C.No.52 of 2015 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur dated 04.08.2016, whereby the learned Judge dismissed the warrant recall petition filed under Section 70(2) of Cr.P.C., by the petitioner.) 1. Tamilselvi, the wife of accused Vellimalai practically seeks help of this Court to get release of her husband, who has been sent to jail in execution of N.B.W., since he had failed to attend the hearing. 2. Vellimalai has been accused of having committed an offence under Section 392 I.P.C. He was charge sheeted. His case is pending in C.C.No.222 of 2012 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam. He was on bail. He had failed to mark his attendance before the Court on the hearing date. The Court did not like this. It, ordered his arrest by issuing N.B.W. It was executed. That is how, Vellimalai had gone back to jail. His wife is not happy. Sh...
M. Gurunathan Vs. The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukkottai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records of the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.A2/560/2012 dated 25.10.2012 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondent to include the petitioner's name in the approved list of Tahsildar in Pudukottai District for the year 2012.) 1. This writ petition is listed today under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of letter of requisition given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the Registry. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition are also dismissed....
M. Govindan Vs. The State of Rep by The Inspector of Police, Balamedu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the First Information Report dated 06.06.2016 in Crime No.102 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal and devoid of merits.) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner/third accused, seeking toquash the First Information Report dated 06.06.2016, registered in Crime No.102 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w 120-B IPC. 2. The case has been registered against eight persons and the petitioner herein is the third accused. 3. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in respect of the release deed and sale deed dated 24.03.2007 and 11.05.2007 respectively, the petitioner has assisted the parties in drafting the documents and in respect of which, no offence could be alleged against the petitioner herein. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that even though a similar compla...
Janakiselvi Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to provide Chief Minister's Relief Amount to the Petitioner within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, her husband died on 23.9.2012, in a fire accident that took place in her house and in fact, her husband, during his life-time, was driving a tri-cycle on 23.09.2012 and an FIR was registered by the South Gate Police Station under Section 174 of Cr.P.C in Crime No.822 of 2012. Her husband has left behind herself and her son Suriyaprabhu, as his legal heirs and now she is the only bread-winner of her family. She is reportedly working as daily coolie and earning a meagre amount. 5. The specific case of the Petitioner is that she is eligible for th...
B. Sridharan and Others Vs. The Union of India, rep. by its Joint Secr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent, vide, G.O.Ms. No.1573 Public (Tourism -I) culminating in its order dated 27.07.1979, as published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary, Part II, Section 2 dated 30.07.1979, in respect of our land, comprised in S.No. 99/3A at No.162, Mamallapuram Village, Chengalpattu District (Now Kancheepuram District) measuring an extent of 55 cents, quash the same and consequently, declare all the subsequent proceedings including the sale of the said land, in the name of the 7th respondent, as null and void and direct the respondents herein to restore the possession of the said land above referred to, to the petitioners.) The petitioners are the legal heirs of one late A. Thiruvengada Mudaliar, who, during his lifetime, along with his three sons, late T. Balaraman, late T. Lakshmanan and late T...
Andrews Ponnuraj Vairamani Vs. The Union of India rep.by the Secretary ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order dated 5.2.2014 made in O.A. No.101 of 2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents 1 to 5 to include the petitioner's name in the panel for promotion to the Post of I.A.S. Conferment by Selection under Non-State Civil Services of Tamil Nadu for the year 2011 with all other consequential benefits. A. Selvam, J. 1. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records relating to the order dated 5.2.2014 passed in Original Application No.101 of 2012 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Madras and to quash the same. 2. The petitioner herein, as applicant, has filed Original Application No.101 of 2012 on the file of the Central Adm...
Shivaraj Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri Police Stati ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2016
(Prayer:Appeal filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Dharmapuri in S.C.No.119 of 2012, dated 08.10.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 2 to 5 in S.C.No.119 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri. The 1st accused was one Velmurugan and the 6th accused was one Palani. The 1st accused Velmurugan died during the trial of the case and thus, the charges framed against him stood abated. So far as the 6th accused is concerned, the trial court, by judgment dated 08.10.2015, acquitted him from all the charges. All these 6 accused stood charged for offence under Section 396 of IPC, in the alternative, under Section 302 (2 counts) of IPC. The trial court, convicted these appellants/the accused 2 to 5 under Section 396 read with 34 of IPC (2 counts) and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo rigor...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »