Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T. Thangamani and Others Vs. The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu C ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Second Respondent to issue the certificate for the renewal of Registration for the Petitioner's Registration No.CTV/437/ASD for running cable TV network operations at S.Krishnapuram, Manarpatti, Kovilpatti, Ayyampatti, Sakkarappanaickanoor in Madurai District on the basis of the Petitioner's representation, dated 1.7.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his representation, dated 1.7.2016 addressed to the Second Respondent/The Post-Master, Arasaradi Post Office, Madurai is pending. The said representation relates to issuance of certificate for the renewal of Registration for the Petitioner's Registration No.CTV/437/ASD for running cable TV network...
M. Karuppasamy Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai Revenu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings in relation to the impugned order Na.Ka.No.A1/2184/2015 dated 27.01.2016 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to reinstate him in service.) 1. Mr.M.Karuppasamy, who is working as Village Assistant, placed under suspension now by the impugned order, dated 27.01.2016, passed by the Tashildar, Virudhunagar, has come to this Court, challenging the same to quash it on the ground that on earlier occasion, when the petitioner was placed under suspension by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, by an order dated 27.07.2015, without any jurisdiction, this Court, by an order, dated 28.09.2015, accepted the case of the petitioner that the Revenue Divisional Officer is an appellate authority, therefore, the petitioner has been deprived of right to file an appeal and quash...
Dr. A.C. Muthiah Vs. The Reserve Bank of India, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records and quash all further proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos.39 to 42 of 2014 pending on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate/ Economic Offences Court-II, Egmore, Chennai.) Common Order: 1. These petitions have been filed to to call for the records and quash all further proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos.39 to 42 of 2014 pending on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate/Economic Offences Court-II, Egmore, Chennai. 2. Heard Mr.V.Gopinath, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Nirmal Kumar, learned counsel on record for the petitioner and Mr.T.Poornam, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. The Reserve Bank of India [hereinafter referred to as the RBI ] has launched four prosecutions in E.O.C.C.Nos.39 to 42 of 2014 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.W.-II, Chennai, against four accused for offences u/s 58B(1) and 58(B) of the RBI Act, 1934, challenging which Dr.A.C.Muthi...
Dix Francis, Trichur District, Kerala Vs. The Income Tax Settlement Co ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, Chennai in its file Settlement Application NO.682/CHN-C/7/2004-IT, for the block period 01.04.1996 to 13.08.2002, quash the impugned order dated 26.04.2005 and consequently direct the first respondent to admit and proceed with the case under Section 245D(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.) Common Order 1. In all these Writ Petitions, the petitioners have challenged the common order passed by the Additional Bench of the Income Tax Settlement Commission, Chennai, dated 26.04.2005, under Section 245D(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). Since the contentions raised by all the petitioners are identical and they are aggrieved by the common order, these Writ Petitions were heard together and are disposed of by this common order. 2. For the purpose of disposal of the...
S. Sangita Vs. Ananda Kumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.88 of 2015 on the file of Sub Court at Virudhunagar and transfer to the file of Principal Family court at Coimbatore.) 1. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.88 of 2015 from the file of Sub Court at Virudhunagar and to transfer the same to the Principal Family court at Coimbatore. 2. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. The marriage between them was solemnized on 29.08.2012e at Arulmighu Senthil Andavar Temple at Sankaralingapuram Village, Virudhunagar District, as per Hindu rites and customs. 3. The case of the petitioner is that due to continuous harassment of the respondent, she has started residing with her parents at Coimbatore and on 09.10.2015, in a road accident, the petitioner sustained injuries, while her mother died on the same day. 4. Per contra, the Learned Counsel for the Respondent would submit that this petition has been fil...
N. Boomiraja and Another Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transp ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.6,77,596/- towards gratuity, Rs.4,16,520/- towards leave salary and also arrears of wages for the period from 01.09.13 to 31.03.15 payable pursuant to new wages settlement dated 13.04.15 together with 18% interest per annum. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.7,98,369/- towards gratuity and Rs.4,95,160/- towards leave salary and also arrears of wages for the period from 01.09.13 to 31.03.15 payable pursuant to new wages settlement dated 13.04.15 together with 18% interest per annum.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondent Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel ...
Mettilbai Vs. Balammal (Died) and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the decree and judgment dated 24.10.2005 passed in A.S.No.30 of 2005, on the file of the learned District Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 13.12.2004 passed in O.S.No.178 of 2003, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram.) 1. The plaintiff, who last the legal battle before both the Courts below, has come forward with this Second Appeal challenging the Judgement and Decree dated 24.10.2005, passed in A.S.No.30 of 2005, on the file of the learned District Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil, by confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 13.12.2004, passed in O.S.No.178 of 2003, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on record. 3. The appellant, as a plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.178 of 2003 for d...
A.R. Rangasamy Vs. S.A. Mohamed
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., against the order dated 12.08.2002 passed in C.A.No.330 of 2000 by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.) When the matter came up before this Court on 13.07.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was adjourned today i.e., 12.08.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution....
U. Ramalakshmi Vs. The Tashildar, Ramanathapuram Tashildar Office, Ram ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2016 seeking to survey and fix the boundary in respect of property in survey no 17/14A2 patta no 2321 to an extent of 6.93 ares situated at enmanangkondan village, ramanathapuram velipattinam sub-division ramanathapuram district.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition to survey her land, which is referred to in this Writ Petition. 2. Mr.S.Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. In view of the limited prayer sought for in this Writ Petition, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 08.08.2016 on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the interested parties and pass appropriate orders, within a per...
Chandrasekar Sivaraman and Others Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Chen ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition has been filed in the SR state under Section 482 Cr.P.C to recall the non-bailable warrants issued against the petitioners Chandrasekar Sivaraman, N.Sivaraman, Gowri Sivaraman and Gayathri Karthik in C.C.No.543 of 2015 on the file of II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai pending execution with the Commissioner of Police, Chennai, the Superintendent, Immigration Department, Meenambakkam Airport and Consulate General of United States, U.S.Embassy, Chennai, cancel the same.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed in the SR stage to recall the non-bailable warrants issued against the petitioners in C.C.No.543 of 2015 on the file of II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, pending execution with the respondents 1 to 3 and to cancel the same. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by their name. 3. Jyotsa Sivakumar, 4th respondent herein, filed C.C.No.543 of 2015 before the II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, C...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »