Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Kumaran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceeding in TIN 33753464034/2015-16 dated 27.06.2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as unconstitutional.) 1. The petitioner/Mr.V.Kumaran has challenged the impugned order of assessment at the hands of the Assistance Commissioner (CT), Sri Rangam Assessment Circle, Trichy, in TIN-33753464034/2015-16 dated 27.06.2016, which is appealable before the Joint Commissioner (CT), Trichy Division. 2. Without preferring any appeal against the final assessment, the petitioner has come to this Court taking a ground that the impugned order is in violation of Article 269 and 285 of the Constitution of India. These grounds can be availed by the petitioner by preferring an appeal against this order before the Joint Commissioner (CT). Therefore, this Court sitting under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot entertain...
Mechanic Kumar and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Depu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Common Prayer in all the Criminal Appeals:- These Criminal Appeals have been filed under Section 374 r/w 382 Cr.P.C., against the judgment passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act cases), Villupuram in S.C.No.41 of 2015 dated 11.12.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant in Crl.A.No.58 of 2016 is A.1; the appellants in Crl.A.No.7 of 2016 are A.5 and A.6 respectively and the appellants in Crl.A.No.796 of 2015 are A.2,A.3,A.4,A.7,A.8 and A.9 respectively in S.C.No.41/2015, on the file of the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act cases), Villupuram. There were totally 14 accused in the case. The trial Court framed six charges against the accused as detailed below:- ad>Sl.NoAccusedSection of law1A.1 to A.14148 I.P.C.2A.1 to A.14448 I.P.C.3A.1, A.2 and A.10302 I.P.C., r/w 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act.4A.1, A.2 and A.10324 I.P.C.(a)A.2 and A.5324 I.P.C.,(b)A.3 and A.8324 I.P.C.,(c)A.4 and A.9324 I.P.C.,5A.6 and A.7324 I.P.C.,6A.1 to A.143(1)(x) of SC/ST Act All the accused denied the above charge...
N. Palanivelu Vs. The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporat ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay to the petitioner Rs.7,66,373/- towards gratuity and Rs.1,23,067/- towards leave Salary and also arrears of wages for the period from 01.09.13 to 31.03.2016 payable pursuant new wage settlement, together with 18% interest per annum, along with interest amounts towards the delays in paying EPF Employees Contribution amount Rs.2,95,475/- for the period from 31.03.16 at the rate as per EPF Scheme and also in paying the Employees Social Security Scheme benefit amount Rs.50,000/- for the period from 31.03.2016 to the realization of the amount at 18% p.a and further directing the respondents to pay him Rs.2,41,000/- towards the pension commutation amount and arrears of pension for the period from 31.01.2016 by revising pension, and the college share amount of Rs.4360/- together with 18% interest per annum, after calculating all terminal/pensio...
P. Chinnaponnu Vs. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Vadipatti Taluk, Madur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider and dispose of the representations of the Petitioner dated 12.11.2015 and 21.6.2016 for transfer of patta to the Petitioner as the Mamorandum of the Respondent in O.Mu.No.12834/2015/B2, dated 25.1.2016 for the properties measuring 48 cents and 36 cents comprised in S.No.254/5, situated at Alanganallur Village, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai without any further delay. ) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondent. 4. According to the Petitioner, her vendors, who are the sons of Venkatraman are the grand-sons of Late. Subbarama Iyer, son of Malaiyappa Iyer. It appears that the grand-father of the Petitioner's vendor, Subbarama Iyer had executed a registered 'Will', dated 31.7.1955 as per the registered document No.720 ...
Chandra Vs. The District Registrar(Admn.), Dindigul District and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents, particularly, the first respondent to place the written objections of the Petitioner made in the representation dated 22.6.2016 before the Valuation Sub-Committee formed under Rule 3 and further to direct the Valuation Sub-Committee to proceed in accordance with Rule 4 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp(Constitution of Valuation Committee for Estimation, Publication and Revision of Market Value Guidelines of Properties) Rules, 2010 for revising the guideline value of the property in S.No.203/2A3 situated at Manjanaickenpatti Village, Oddanchatram Taluk and further to direct the Valuation Sub-Committee to decide the guideline value by affording sufficient opportunity to the Petitioner to put-forth her case.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behal...
M/s Noor Timbers rep. by its Partner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the Assessment order in TIN 33205580343/2010-11, dated 30.05.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent quash the same and to direct the 3rd respondent to pass Assessment under Section 22(2) and to accord a personal hearing and then to pass fresh order for the assessment year 2010-2011.) 1. M/s Noor Timbers represented by its Proprietor Thiru H.Howdali @ Babu has challenged the impugned proceedings issued by the Commercial Tax Officer, Thirunelveli Town, Thirunelveli in TIN 33205580343/2010-11, dated 30.05.2016. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under TN VAT Act 2006 and also an assessee in the books of the 3rd respondent. The petitioner is a Dealer in Timbers. The petitioner submits the returns to the 3rd respondent as per the provisions laid down under 7(1)(a) of the TN VAT rules. While so, the 3rd respondent, the Commercial Tax Offic...
A. Vivekanandan Vs. The Inspector of Police, CB-CID (Unit-II), Chennai ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C. No.4974 of 2013 on the file of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai and quash the same.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in C.C. No.4974 of 2013 on the file of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai and quash the same. 2. On the complaint given by the Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, K.K. Nagar Division, Tamil Nadu Housing Board on 26.11.2008, a case in Crime No.1 of 2008 was registered by the CB-CID and after completing the investigation, final report in C.C. No.4974 of 2013 has been filed before the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, for offences under Section 120-B and 109 read with Sectioni 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC, against 8 accused, challenging which, A. Vivekanandan (A8), formerly Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, is before this Court. 3. ...
Kannayira Desikar Vs. Chellamani and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC., against the judgment and decree dated 19.06.1998 in O.S.No.78 of 1991 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sivaganga as confirmed in the judgment and decree dated 25.1.99 in A.S.No.l154 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Sivagangai.) 1. The first defendant, who lost the legal battle before both the Courts below, has come forward with this second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 25.1.99 in A.S.No.l154 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Sivagangai. Confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.06.1998 in O.S.No.78 of 1991 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sivaganga. 2. The respondents 1 to 8, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration that the suit property is belonging to the plaintiffs 1, 3 to 8 and the second defendant and consequential injunction, restraining the defendants not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property stating that ...
G. Chitraleka Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Depa ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of Post Graduate Assistant in Tamil under the Recruitment process conducted by the 2nd respondent Teacher Recruitment Board for which the written examination was conducted on 21.07.2013.) 1. This writ petition is listed today under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of letter of requisition given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the Registry. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
R. Govindaraj and Others Vs. The Management of Tamilnadu State Transpo ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay petitioner Rs. 5,11,200/- towards gratuity and Rs.3,74,467/- towards leave salary and also arrears of wages for the period from 01.09.13 to 31.05.2015 payable pursuant new wage settlement together with 18% interest per annum along with interest amounts towards the delays in paying EPF employees contribution amount Rs.2,34,444/- for the period from 31.05.15 to 06.02.16 at the rate as per EPF Scheme and also in paying the Employees Social Security Scheme benefit amount Rs.50,000/- for the period from 31.05.2014 to 13.08.2015 at 18% p.a., and further directing the respondents to pay to the petitioner Rs.2,23,204/- towards the pension Commutation amount and arrears of pension for the period from 01.06.15 by revising pension and the college share amount of Rs.2000/- together with 18% interest per annum, after calculating all terminal/pension ...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »