Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Maharani Textiles Vs. The Chairman (IRDA), Office of the IRDA, an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to amend the policy in respect of conditions No.3, 6 (a) and 14 of the General conditions of policy and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to disburse the theft amount Rs.7 lacs in respect of policy No.SSO-6410 to the petitioner.) 1. The petitioner has taken a Policy from the second respondent. The petitioner lost money while it was taken from his shop to the residence. The claim made by the petitioner was rejected by the Insurance Company. The petitioner filed a Writ Petition in W.P.(MD).No.11019 of 2009 directing the secondrespondent to pay an amount of Rs.7,00,000/- on the strength of the policy, the Writ Petition was dismissed. 2. The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition directing the first respondent to amend the policy in respect of condition Nos.3, 6(a) and 14 of the General Conditions of Policy and consequently, direct ...
Parthiban and Others Vs. State, Represented by, Inspector of Police, A ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeals filed under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the judgement of the learned District and Principal Sessions Judge, Ariyalur, in S.C.No.83 of 2014, dated 20.04.2016.) Common Judgment S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 to 14 in Sessions Case No.83 of 2014 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ariyalur. The trial Court framed charges under Sections 147, 148, 449 and 302 IPC against all the 14 accused. By judgement, dated 20.04.2016, the trial Court convicted all the 14 accused and sentenced them as detailed below:- ad>Sl.No.Rank of the AccusedChargesSentence1A-1 to A-14147 IPCRigorous Imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs.1,000/-each in default to under go simple imprisonment for one month2A-1 to A-14148 IPCRigorous Imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs.1,000/-each, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month3A-1 to A-3449 IPCImprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each i...
T. Karuppusamy and Others Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retirement benefits with interest to the petitioner in view of the representation dated 19.07.2016.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advocate General submit...
M. Thamilarasan and Others Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Tran ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.5,10,098/- towards gratuity and Rs.36,229/- towards leave salary together with 18% interest per annum and further directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to pay him interest amount towards the delayed payment of pension Commutation amount Rs.2,49,221/- for the period from 01.05.13 to 24.10.13 at the rate of 18% p.a. within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honble Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos. 383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the requ...
The Principal (I/C), RVS Siddha Medical College and Hospital, Coimbato ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 4th respondent TN Dr.M.G.R. Medical University in Letter Rc.No.Affln.I(3)/21927/2014 dated 18.09.2014, quash the same insofar as it insists the petitioner College to surrender 18 seats by adjusting 6 seats each year from its Management Quota in favour of the Government for three academic years viz., 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017.) 1. The petitioner, aggrieved by the proceedings of the fourth respondent dated 18.09.2014, in and by which the petitioner college was directed to surrender 18 seats by adjusting 6 seats each year from its Management Quota in favour of the Government in respect of three academic years viz., 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, had filed this writ petition. 2. Facts leading to the filing of this writ petition, briefly narrated, are as follows: 2.1. The Principal of the p...
State represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Cri ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 23.12.2009 in C.C.No.20 of 2004 on the file of the III Additional Special Court, Chennai.) 1. This appeal is filed by the State against the judgment of acquittal of the respondents/A1 and A2 in C.C.No.20 of 2004, dated 23.12.2009 on the file of the III Additional Special Court, Chennai, whereby, the respondents/A1 and A2 were acquitted under Section 235(1) Cr.P.C. in respect of the charges levelled against them under Section 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 364 read with 34 IPC, 385 read with 34 IPC and Section 352 read with 34 IPC. 2. At the relevant point of time, A1 was the Inspector of Police and A-2 to A-4 were the Head Constables. It is the case of the prosecution that P.W.2 / de-facto complainant was running a pawn broker shop in No.262, Kamaraj Street, Villupuram. One Thirunendran is having a jewellery shop in NSC Bose Road, Chennai and since P.W.2 was...
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Trichy Vs. M/s. Sangu Chakra Hotels (P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order made in I.T.A.No.1351/Mds/2015, dated 14.10.2015.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this Tax Case Appeal, is to an order made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A.No.1351/Mds/2015, dated 14.10.2015, by which, the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal preferred by the revenue, against the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax(A) in I.T.A.No.188/2010- 11/CIT(A)/TRY, dated 29.01.2014. 2. Short facts leading to the appeal are that the assessee is a private limited company, engaged in the business of running a Tourist Hotel. The assessee filed its return of income on 21.09.2008, admitting total income as Rs.70,10,580/-. Return was taken for scrutiny and assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act (Hereinafter referred to as, "the Act") was completed on 30.12.2010, wherein the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of depreciation of Rs.3,78,00,000/-, on the cost of Wind Mill of ...
Kumar and Others Vs. State by: The Inspector of Police, Salem District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code against the judgement of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, in S.C.No.179 of 2015, dated 10.03.2016.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 to 4 in S.C.No.179 of 2015 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem. The trial court framed as many as three charges against the accused. The first charge was against the accused 1 to 4 under Section 341 IPC. The second charge was under Section 302 IPC against the first accused and under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC against accused 2 to 4 and the third charge was under Section 506 (ii) IPC against the accused 1 to 4. 2. By judgment, dated 10.03.2016, the trial court convicted them under all the charges and sentenced them as detailed below:- ad>AccusedSection of lawSentenceA-1 to A-4341 IPC.,Each of the accused to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one month.A-1U/s 302 IPC.,To undergo Imprisonment for life an...
S. Badmanaban and Others Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporatio ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to pay entire terminal benefits payable to the petitioner including Gratuity, Commuted Value of Pension and Leave Salary together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till the date of payment within the time that may be stipulated by this Court. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.9,20,648/- towards Gratuity, Rs.5,66,267/- towards Leave Salary Rs.1,44,990/- towards encashment of Leave on personal Affairs Rs.50,000/- towards Social Security Scheme benefit and Rs.4,360/- towards refundable deposits together with 18% interest per annum along with interest amount towards the delay period from 30.04.2016 to 21.11.16 in paying EPF Employees Contribution amount Rs.2,86,363/- at the ra...
Ponnumani and Others Vs. The Executive Officer, Vilathurai Panchayat, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on merits and according to law on petitioners representation dated 11.7.2016.) 1. The petitioner herein has come to this Court, seeking the issuance of a mandamus, directing the respondent to consider his representation, dated 11.7.2016, wherein, he has made a request to the said Authority to assess his residential place for house-tax. 2. First of all, the petitioner is not able to explain before this Court whether the house/property legally belongs to him. No document is produced therefor to substantiate that the property in question is owned by the petitioner. 3. Hence, this Court is not able to issue any direction to the respondent for considering the representation of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs....
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »