Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
R.K. Venkatraman Vs. Gagandeep Singh Bedi, I.A.S, The Secretary to Gov ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempts Court Act,1971 to call upon the contemnors/ respondents for having wilfully and wantonly disobeying the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.12516 of 2015 dated 22.07.2015.) T. Raja. J, 1. When the matter is taken-up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the order under contempt has been complied with. In support of the same, he also produced the proceedings of the third respondent made in Na.Ka.FB5/5794/2015 dated 11.07.2016. A copy thereof has also been given to the petitioner. 2. Since the order under contempt has been complied with, this Contempt Petition is closed....
Tag this Judgment!A. Mahendran Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District and Oth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to release the Petitioner's Tractor(Agriculture) bearing Registration No.TN 29 S 1746 seized by the third respondent on 26.3.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. The Petitioner has preferred the present Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Second Respondent/The Revenue Divisional officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District to release his Tractor(Agriculture), bearing Registration No.TN 29 S 1746 seized by the Third Respondent/The Sub-Inspector of Police, Elayirampannai Police Station, Virudhunagar District on 26.3.2016 at about evening 6.30 p.m and the vehicle was seized for transporting sand and produced before the Second Respondent/The Revenue Divisional officer...
Tag this Judgment!Arumugam Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, Vellore District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Vellore in S.C.No.56 of 2013 dated 16.03.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.56 of 2013 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Vellore. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. By judgment dated 16.03.2015, the trial Court convicted him under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows: 2.1. The deceased in this case was one Mr.Balaji. He was a resident of Kelvadukan Kuttai village at Katpadi. P.W.1 Mrs.Usha is the sister of the deceased. She was given in marriage to one Mr.Kannan of Jabrapet village in Katpadi. She lived...
Tag this Judgment!K. Palanivel Vs. The Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO, formerl ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to appoint the Petitioner to the post of ITI Helper (Trainee) with attendant, service and monetary benefits in the above said post pursuant to the proceedings of the second respondent herein namely, the Chief Engineer (Personnel), Chennai, TANGEDCO, formerly TNEB Limited, bearing No.044771/201/G.57/ G.572/2012-12, dated 28.10.2013.) Common Order: 1. The case of the petitioners are that after completion of the SSLC i.e. 10th standard new pattern public examination, all the petitioners are undergone and completed the course of training at Government Industrial Training Institute at various places and passed the prescribed trade test in the trade of Wireman held in the month of July 1988 and subsequent years and awarded the certificate provisionally to them. They also issued National Trade Certificate by the Government of India. 2. T...
Tag this Judgment!K. Palanisamy Vs. The Sub Registrar, Komarapalayam Sub Registrar Offic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the cheque slip No.1 of 2016 dated 15.03.2016 passed by the respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to register the mortgage deed dated 14.03.2016 submitted by the petitioner by considering the representation dated 15.03.2016.) 1. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner would state that he purchased the property in Survey Nos.297/2, 297/3 and 297/4 admeasuring to an extent of Punja Acre 3.08 situated at Komarapalayam Agraharam Village, Trichengode Taluk, Namakkal District through a registered Sale Deed dated 29.03.1990 bearing Document No.742 of 1990 on the file of Office of the Sub Registrar, Vadakancherry, Palakkad District, Kerala State and according to the petitioner, he claims to be in possession and enjoyment of the said property and the said registratio...
Tag this Judgment!Bassalis Vs. Sajan Singh Chawan The District Collector, Kanyakumari
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondent for his deliberate and wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court made in WP (MD) No.18020 of 2014 dated 10/11/2014.) 1. It is represented on behalf of the respondent that a sum of Rs.92,500/- (Rupees Ninety Two Thousand and Five Hundred Only) was paid in favour of the petitioner. To that effect, it is quite evident that the Government had issued G.O.(D).No.393, Revenue [LR.I(2)] Department, dated 13.08.2015, inter alia stating as under: 6. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District is directed to take necessary action to disburse the amount of Rs.92,500/- (Rupees Ninety Two Thousand and Five Hundred Only) directly to Tmt.Bassalis, W/o. (Late) Rayappan, Aralvoimozhi Village, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District. and in fact, the petitioner had acknowledged the same through a receipt. 2. In view of the fact that the petitioner was paid with a sum of Rs.92,500/- (...
Tag this Judgment!Chinnammal Vs. The Commissioner, City Corporation, Tiruchirappalli Cit ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to alter the name of the petitioner's husband as Chokkan and the name of the petitioner's father-in-law as Rengan and the age of the petitioner's husband as 65 years in the death certificate issued by the 2nd respondent dated 27.02.2016 and to direct the 2nd respondent to issue a fresh death certificate for the death of the petitioner's husband who died on 21.06.2014 as per the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondent. 4. According to the petitioner, her marriage with her husband Chokkan took place in the year 1983 and ever since the year 1983, she was residing with her husband at the petitioned address. In fact her husband was employed in Thiakesar Aalai, Manapparai, a textile unit of Meenakshi Mi...
Tag this Judgment!Raja Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to set aside the onerous condition imposed in the impugned order dated 24.06.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.1679 of 2016 in C.C.No.19 of 2016 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District.) 1. This petition has been filed praying to set aside the condition imposed on the petitioner in the order dated 24.06.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.1679 of 2016 in C.C.No.19 of 2016 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District. 2. It is averred in the petition that the petitioner has been arrayed as accused in Crime No.40 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 379 IPC. The petitioner herein has moved a petition before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District in Cr.M.P.No.1679 of 2016 for bail and the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District, after hearing both sides, enlarged the petitioner on bai...
Tag this Judgment!Venkateswaralu Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Thiruvallur District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the order dated 06.06.2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, in Crl.M.P.No.2642 of 2016.) 1. This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order dated 06.06.2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, in Crl.M.P.No.2642 of 2016, in Crime No.267 of 2016, dismissing the petition filed by the revision petitioner for return of property i.e., two wheeler Honda CB Twister BS111 bearing Registration No.TN-18-F-1987. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently contended that the above said vehicle namely Two Wheller, Honda CB Twister BS111 bearing Registration No.TN-18-F-1987 belongs to the petitioner and on the fateful day i.e., on 30.04.2016, the petitioner's cousin brother namely V.Raj...
Tag this Judgment!Sarasu Vs. Ravi
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 21.07.2005 made in I.A.No.649 of 2004 in O.S.No.852 of 2000 on the file of II Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli.) 1. Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order, dated 21.07.2005, made in I.A.No.649 of 2004 in O.S.No.852 of 2000 on the file of II-Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruchirappalli. 2. The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.852 of 2000 against the petitioner/defendant for specific performance before the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli. 3. The case of the respondent/plaintiff is that she entered in to an agreement with the petitioner/defendant on 09.03.2000, whereby and whereunder, the petitioner/defendant agreed to sell his property for a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- and the respondent/plaintiff paid an advance of Rs.95,000/- on the said date and the balance sale consideration should be paid within a period of seven months. On receipt of such balance sale considera...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »