Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Rajagopalan and Others Vs. Srinivasa Engineering Works, represented ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer in Crl.O.P. No.27882 of 2015: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., seeking to set aside the order dated 14.09.2015 passed in Memo in S.T.C. No.2668 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur. Crl.O.P. No.1372 of 2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., seeking to call for the records pertaining to S.T.C. No.2668 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur and quash the said complaint in S.T.C. No.2668 of 2014 filed by the respondent.) 1. While Crl.O.P. No.27882 of 2015 is filed to set aside the order dated 14.09.2015 passed in Memo in S.T.C. No.2668 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur, Crl.O.P. No.1372 of 2016 is filed to call for the records pertaining to S.T.C. No.2668 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur and quash the said complaint in S.T.C. No.2668 of 2014 filed by the respondent. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred ...
D. Premaram Vs. P. Leelavathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1960 to set aside the order dated 08.12.2015 made in R.C.A.No.65 of 2014 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Coimbatore confirming the order dated 07.07.2014 made in I.A.No.99 of 2014 in R.C.O.P.No.4 of 2012 on the file of I Additional District Munsif of Coimbatore.) 1. Challenging the judgment and decree passed in R.C.A.No.65 of 2014 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Coimbatore confirming the order passed in I.A.No.99 of 2014 in R.C.O.P.No.4 of 2012 on the file of I Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore, the tenant has filed the above Civil Revision Petition 2. The respondent-landlord has filed the Original Petition in R.C.O.P.No.4 of 2012 for eviction on the ground of own use and occupation. 3. The tenant filed his counter and is contesting the matter. 4. Subsequently, the landlord filed an application in I.A.No.99 of 2014 under Order 6 rule 17 of CPC to a...
Viswanathan Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Puducherry
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Appeals filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Puducherry, made in S.C.No.30 of 2003 dated 09.09.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants in Crl.A.No.594 of 2015 are the accused 1 and 2 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.64 of 2016 is the 3rd accused in S.C.No.30 of 2003 on the file of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Puducherry. They stood charged for offence under Section 364-A read with 34 of IPC. By judgment dated 09.09.2015, the trial court convicted all the three accused under the said charge and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. Challenging the same, the appellants are before this Court with these appeals. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows: (a) P.Ws.1 and 2 are father and mother respectively and P.W.3 is the uncle of P...
A. Pani Renilson Vs. The Regional Passport Officer, Madurai Region, Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to issue a passport to the petitioner by considering his passport application in File No.MD2068965887715 in the light of the Notification issued by the Ministry of External Affairs vide G.S.R.570(E) dated 25.08.1993.) 1. According to the Petitioner, he is serving as a driver in and around of his village and derives a meagre income, which is not enough to run his family and manage his brother's study. With a view to secure a job and to earn a considerable amount by getting a job at abroad, on 22.11.2015, he submitted an on-line application for securing a fresh passport for him at Passport Seva Kendra, Tirunelveli City and his application was accepted vide reference No.15-1010317399. He also paid necessary charges and personally appeared on 24.11.2015 at the Passport Seva Kendra, Tirunelveli City and produced all relevant documents before the authority...
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Vs. Nada ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, to set aside the decree and Judgment dated 26.03.2008 and made in MCOP No.579 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Court, Pudukkottai.) 1. This appeal is directed against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Court), Pudukottai, passed in MCOP No.579 of 2006 dated 26.03.2008 2. According to the claimants, on 23.03.2006 at 4.45 a.m the deceased Meenakshi was travelling as a passenger in a bus bearing Registration No. TN-57-N-0258 belonging to the appellant Transport Corporation from her village Panagkulam to Aranthangi. When the bus was stopped at Aranthangi Town, Taluk Office Road near Kamarajar Bus Stop, the deceased was alighting from the bus, however, without noticing the same, the driver of the bus had moved the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and thereby she fell down and ran over by the backside wheel and she died ...
R. Alagar Vs. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Letter (Ms)No.674, dated 14.11.2007 and quash the same and to grant all attendant benefits.) 1. This Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 14 November, 2007, on the file of the first respondent, rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioner, without considering the merits of the matter. THE FACTS: 2. The fourth respondent initiated proceedings against the petitioner by issuing a charge memo under Rule 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, on allegation that he gave false assurance to a handicapped person to secure a Government job and took Rs.250/- from him and thereby, misused his official power. The explanation submitted by the petitioner was not found satisfactory. The Enquiry Officer appointed by the fourth respo...
K. Annapoornam Vs. The Secretary to Government, Personnel and Administ ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of this Court dated 26.10.2015 passed in W.P(MD)No.19170 of 2015.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. This appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner/appellant calling in question the correctness of the judgment and order dated 26.10.2015 passed in the writ petition instituted by her. 2. The writ petitioner/appellant is one of those otherwise talented candidates who could not end up in getting selected to the post of Sub Inspector of Police (Women). The State has taken out an advertisement on 08.02.2015, inviting applications for filling up of as many as 1,078 posts of Sub Inspector of Police. It is not in doubt that 30% of the posts are required to be filled in by women candidates. The selection process comprised of three stages. The first is a written test, followed by the second stage of selection process comprising of Physical Measurement Test/Physical Endurance Test/Physical Efficiency Test. The last and final sta...
S. Ramasamy Vs. The Director of Town Panchayats Office of the Director ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records that relates to the impugned transfer order passed by the first respondent herein dated 01.10.2015 bearing Ref.No.Na.Ka.No.11200/2014/A6 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent herein to permit the petitioner to continue in the same place i.e., at the office of the Assistant Director of Panchayat, Coimbatore as Assistant Engineer till his completion of three years.) 1. The petitioner calls in question the order dated 01.10.2015 passed by the first respondent by which he was transferred from Coimbatore to Cuddalore District. 2. Mr. Bharatha Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner attacked the impugned order on several grounds. At the outset, he would contend that before passing the impugned order of transfer, the petitioner was transferred on four occasion within a short period of two years from place to pla...
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Vs. Tamilarasi and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, to set aside the decree and Judgment passed in MCOP No.79 of 2004, dated 07th day of July 2008, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, District Judge, Sivagangai.) 1. Aggrieved over the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Judge, Sivagangai, passed in MCOP No.79 of 2004 dated 07.10.2008, the present appeal has been filed by the appellant Transport Corporation. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 03.09.2002 at 9.00 hours, the deceased Pandi was driving Hundai Car bearing Registration No. TN-59-R-2293 with one Subramanian and his family members from Salem and when the Car was proceedings near Moonusavadi big bridge, the bus belonging to the appellant Transport Corporation bearing Registration No. TN-27-N-0927, which was coming from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the Car. Immediately, the deceased and other passenger wer...
K.E. Dayalan and Another Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu represented by Th ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
(Prayer: Crl.OP No. 24558 of 2015:- Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the records and quash the proceedings in Crime No.89 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent. Crl.OP No. 24585 of 2015:- Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the records and quash the proceedings in Crime No.118 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent.) Common Order: 1. Crl.OP No. 24558 of 20105 has been filed by the petitioners, who are arrayed accused in Crime No. 89 of 2015. They sought for quashing the first information report filed against them in Crime No. 89 of 2015. The case in Crime No. 89 of 2015 has been registered at the instance of the second respondent herein for the offences punishable under Section 406, 420 and 506 (i) of IPC. 2. Crl.OP No. 24585 of 2015 has been filed by A-1 and A-3 in Crime No. 118 of 2015. They seek for quashing the proceedings in Crime No. 118 of 2015. The said case was registered at t...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »