Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maheswari and Another Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police Tharam ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Appeals filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Mahila Judge, Salem in S.C.No.290 of 2012 dated 20.01.2014.) Common Judgment: S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 and 2 in S.C.No.290 of 2012 on the file of the learned Mahila Judge, Salem. The trial Court framed as many as four charges against the accused 1 and 2 as follows: ad>Serial Number of chargeCharge(s) framed against Charge(s) framed under Section1A1 and A2120-B of IPC2A1 and A2449 of IPC3A1302 of IPC4A2302 r/w 34 of IPC By judgment dated 20.01.2014, the trial Court convicted and sentenced both the accused for various offences as detailed below : ad>Rank of theAccusedPenal provision(s) under which convictedSentenceA1Section 302 of IPCImprisonment for life years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. Section 449 of IPCImprisonment for life Section 120-B of I.P.C.Rigorous Imprisonment for two y...
T.R. Mani Vs. The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary to Government, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandumus to quash the order of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench made in O.A.No.1041 of 2003 dated 14.10.2004 confirming the order of the 2nd respondent herein made in No.EP-13(16)/T3-ECD-1 dated 31.05.2002 after calling for the records and direct the 2nd respondent herein to extend the scheme of five yearly assessment for promotion on merit to the petitioner and advance increment in conformity with Dr.Ramamurty's Reviewing Committee report which has already been extended to ICMR Scientific Staff with effect from 01.01.1990 and consequently pay the arrears of salary and to grant promotion to the petitioner in conformity with Rule 8 of the Department of Health [Group 'A' Gazetted Non-Medical Scientific and Technical Posts] Insitu Promotion Rules, 1990 with effect from 01.01.1990 and pay the arrears of salary with interest.) P. Kalaiyar...
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, Chennai V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 13.01.2015 made in W.P.No.18144 of 2014.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. This appeal by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission is against the order of the learned single Judge dated 13.1.2015 made in W.P.No.18144 of 2014, directing the Commission to consider the petitioner for appointment to the Group-I post under the preferential allotment to persons studied in Tamil medium. 2. Heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant, learned counsel taking notice on behalf of the first respondent/writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader taking notice on behalf of the second respondent. 3. It appears that the first respondent/writ petitioner, after completing his X Standard and H.S.C., acquired the B.A.Degree in Tamil under the Open University programme during January 2012 and also the B.E.Degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering under the regular programme during April 2012. On the stre...
B. V. Surendra Sha Vs. The Secretary to Government Municipal Administr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(PRAYER : This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the punishment order passed by the 2nd respondent in Roc. No. 53108/2011/C4 dated 24.01.2012 and the consequential orders passed by the 1st respondent in G.O. (D) No.549 Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 4.11.2013 and in G.O (D) No. 376 M.A. and W.S Department dated 7.10.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to restore the increment to the petitioner on due date and to pass further orders.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned orders passed by the 2nd respondent in Roc. No. 53108/2011/C4 dated 24.01.2012 and the consequential orders passed by the 1st respondent in G.O. (D) No.549 Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 4.11.2013 and in G.O (D) No. 376 M.A. and W.S Department dated 7.10.2014. 2. Learned counsel f...
B. Ranjith Kumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.06.2016 and take necessary action within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.06.2016 and take necessary action. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that on the complaint dated 17.06.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.487 of 2016 dated 03.07.2016 for offences under Sections 147, 448 and 379 IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
K. Karuppasamy Vs. The Regional Manager, Pandian Grama Bank, Virudhuna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to permit the Petitioner to open the Locker No.C6 and further to close the Fixed Deposit No.FDR.211300018SB3803 within the time fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. According to the Petitioner, he is holding an Account No.521501000003803 with the Second Respondent/Pandian Grama Bank, Pudukkottai Branch, Pudukkottai and also Locker No.C6 in his name. 3. It is his stand that on 17.2.2014, while he was travelling from Usilankulam on his bike, he had missed the Bank Pass-book, and Locker Key provided by the Second Respondent. In spite of diligent search, he could not find the Bank Pass-book and Locker Key. Therefore, he filed a complaint before the Inspector of Police, Kalaiyarkoil Police station, Sivagangai District and obtained Receipt No.129 of 2014. Thereafter, on 7,3,2014, the Petitioner submitted a r...
M. Murugan @ Ramesh Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Ins ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 (2) Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court (Mahila Fast Track Court), Erode, in S.C.No.41 of 2015 on 31.08.2015.) V. Bharathidasan, J. 1. The sole accused in S.C.No.41 of 2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court (Mahila Fast Track Court), Erode, is the appellant herein. He stood charged for an offence under Sections 341, 294 (b) and 307 IPC. The trial Court convicted him under Section 341 IPC and sentenced him to undergo one month simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500/-, in absence to undergo simple imprisonment for one week and convicted him under Section 294(b) IPC and sentenced him to undergo three months rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo two weeks simple imprisonment and also found him guilty under Section 307 IPC and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo two ye...
Ramanathan Vs. State, represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police Devip ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining to the order passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge / Presiding Officer Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukkottai in Crl.M.P.No.1450 of 2015 vide its order dated 02.02.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the above said learned Special Judge to return the vehicle namely Lancer Car (Black Color) bearings its registration No.TN33 AB6162 in connection with the case in Crime No.8 of 2015 pending on the file of the respondent to the petitioner.) 1. The Car Owner / A1 aggrieved by the dismissal of his property return petition in Cr.M.P.No.1450 of 2015, by the learned Special Judge under E.C. and N.D.P.S.Act, Pudukkottai, has directed this revision. 2. In connection with Crime No.8 of 2015, Devipattinam Police seized a Lancer Car (TN33 AB6162). The Car has been produced with Form-95 to the Court. It has become a case-property.The revisi...
S. Muniyandi Vs. The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant Patta for petitioner's property bearing Old Survey/Paimash No.1189, now known as Survey No.127/6, an extent of 65.45 cents situated in Sevalpatti Village, Karyapatti Taluk, Aruppukottai Sub Division of Virudhunagar District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.03.2016 within the period stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his grand father Arumuga Nadar, S/o.Valaguruva Nadar, had acquired a property bearing Old Survey/Paimash No.1189, now known as Survey No.127/6, measuring an extent of 65.45 cents situated in Sevalpatti Village, Karyapatti Taluk, Aruppukottai Sub Division, Virudhunagar District, by means of purchase on 02.05.1917 (vide Registration No....
J. Gnanadurai and Others Vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue patta to the petitioners for the land measuring Western 1 Acre 33 Cents in Survey No.28/4B and Survey No.28/4C1, Thathaneri Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District and to pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue patta to the petitioners for the land measuring Eastern 40 Cents in Survey No.28/4B and Survey No.28/4C1, Thathaneri Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District and to pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The facts in both cases are not in dispute that the petitioners are the lawful owners of their respective properties. 2. It appears that the Tamil Nadu State Housing Board issued a notification in G.O.R....
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »