Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thiyagarajan Vs. The Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry and Ano ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to the impugned Charge Sheet/Final Report No.121 of 2015 dated 14.09.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent, pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry, in Special SC No.21 of 2015 and to quash the same.) 1. This criminal original petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the impugned Charge Sheet/Final Report No.121 of 2015 dated 14.09.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent and Special SC No.21 of 2015, pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry, and to quash the same. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to by their name. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Pondy) appearing for the first respondent. 4. On the complaint lodged by one Renuga @ Dhivya, the respondent police registered a case in Crim...
Mytrah Energy (India) Limited Vs. Gamesa Renewable Private Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
1. This application is filed by the applicant/second defendant to revoke the leave granted to the first respondent/plaintiff by this Court in A.No.5574 of 2015 dated 18.08.2015 to institute C.S.No.697 of 2015. 2. For the sake of brevity, the plaintiff and the defendants in C.S.No.697 of 2015 are arrayed as such. 3. The Facts in Brief:- 3.1. The plaintiff is engaged in the business of manufacturing, erecting and commissioning of Wind Turbines and development of wind power as well as solar power projects for its customers in various parts of India. The second defendant is the company, which entered into a Multi Annual Agreement along with Addendum on 04.05.2011 with the plaintiff for supply, erection, commissioning, operation and maintenance of 2000 MW Wind Power Projects. It was followed by an amendment entered into on 30.09.2011. On the same day, the second defendant raised purchase order to the plaintiff. The first defendant, who is a legally qualified person, was appointed as General...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. Heard the Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner/Trust/College. 2. According to the Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner/Trust/College, the impugned order dated 04.07.2016 of the Fifth Respondent/Dean (Agriculture) and Chairman Admissions, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, in withholding the admission for the first year B.Sc., (Agriculture) programme of the Petitioner's College for the academic year 2016 2017, on the ground that there is no permanent infrastructure facilities in the campus and further, the temporary infrastructure facilities available in the campus are poor and inadequate for the students' intake etc., is per se illegal, arbitrary and the same is liable to be set aside in furtherance of substantial cause of justice. 3. Advancing his argument, the Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner/Trust/College urges before this Court that the impugned order of the Fifth Respondent/Dean (Agriculture) and Chairman Admissions,...
P. Velusamy Vs. K.V. Raghupathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the order passed on 27.01.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.3434 of 2015 in C.C.No.585 of 2009 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.1, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai as devoid of Merits.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the order passed on 27.01.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.3434 of 2015 in C.C.No.585 of 2009 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.1, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai as devoid of Merits. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as the Complainant and Accused. 3. It is the case of the complainant that the accused borrowed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three lakhs only) from him in July, 2007 and issued a cheque dated 28.08.2008 for Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only), which when presented, was dishonoured. The complainant issued a statutory notice dated 09.09.2008 and afte...
Rishyashringa Jewellers Limited rep by its Managing Director K. Govind ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: The Company petitioner praying this Court a) To wind up of the Petitioner Company under the provisions of the Companies Act 1956; and b) To appoint the Official Liquidator as a Liquidator of the Petitioner Company.) 1. The Company Application coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of M/s. Ramakrishnan Viraraghavan, Advocate for the petitioner herein and of Mr. P. Atchutha Ramaiah, Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras and counter affidavit filed by the Registrar of Companies, Tamilnadu, Coimbatore, the court made the following order: 1. This is the company petition filed qua a company going by the name Sishyashringa Jewellers Limited (in short RJL ) under Sections 433(c), (e), (f), 434(1)(c) and 439(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short Act ), read with, Rule 11(a) of the Companies Court Rules, 1959 (in short Rules ). 2. Notice in this petition was issued to the Registrar of Companies (R.O.C.). Despite which, there was no representation on ...
Thirunavukarasu Vs. The Secretary to Government, Department of Municip ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to appoint the petitioner as Fitter in the fourth respondent's office.) 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition to which he also circulated a letter to the Registry seeking withdrawal of this Writ Petition, apart from making an endorsement, in the bundle. 2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
Shanthi Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, Villuppuram
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Villuppuram in S.C.No.36 of 2014 dated 18.04.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the second accused in S.C.No.36 of 2014 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Villuppuram. The first accused was one Mr.Koki kumar @ Kumar @ Ashok Kumar. The first accused stood charged for offences under Sections 120(b), 448, 393 and 302 I.P.C. and the second accused / appellant herein stood charged for offences under Sections 120(b), 448, 393 and 302 r/w 34 I.P.C. By judgment dated 18.04.2015, the trial Court found both the accused guilty under all the charges. So far as the appellant / second accused is concerned, the trial court sentenced her to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year for...
T. Johnraj Vs. The Sub-Registrar, Kulathur @ Keeranur, Pudukkottai Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Respondent in Letter No.3 of 2016, dated 23.6.2016 and to quash the same as illegal and arbitrary at once.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondent. 4. According to the Petitioner, he and his brother's wife Mrs. Mercy formed a partnership firm on 27.01.1999 and purchased the property measuring an extent of 5 acres in various sub-divisions of S.No.488 and purchased the property in question through a Court Auction Sale. Delivery Application was filed in E.A.No.38 of 2000 in E.P.No.142 of 1985 in High Court C.S.No.235 of 1978 and the delivery was recorded. 5. The real grievance of the Petitioner is that, to his shock and surprise, had received a communication in Letter No.3 of 2016, dated 23.06.2016 from the Respo...
K. Ananthakumar Vs. Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-corruption ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records leading to the order dated 07.01.2016 passed in Crl.M.P.No.255/2015 in Spl.C.C.No.118/2014 on the file of the learned Special Judge (Special Court for Trail of cases under prevention of Corruption Act), Salem, and to set aside the same and allow the revision with cost.) 1. Challenging the order of dismissal of the discharge petition filed by the petitioner under Section 239 of Cr.P.C, passed by the learned Special Judge (Special Court for Trail of cases under prevention of Corruption Act), Salem, in Crl.M.P.No.255/2015 in Spl.C.C.No.118/2014 dated 07.01.2016, the petitioner has preferred this Revision before this Court. 2. The brief case of the prosecution is as follows:- The petitioner herein has been arrayed as 8th accused in Spl.C.C.No.118 of 2014 pending on the file of the Special Judge (Special Court for Trail of cases under prevention of Corrupt...
P. Rengasamy Vs. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Trichy
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to close the petitioner's loan account No.30293017255 under OTS scheme letter dated 05.01.2016 and return back the Petitioner's title deeds which was mortgaged by the petitioner in the loan account on the basis of the Petitioner's representation, dated 11.06.2016.) 1. Heard the Petitioner / Party-in-person. 2. According to the Petitioner, he is a small farmer, owning small extent of agricultural lands and obtained a loan of Rs.5,50,000/- from the Respondent / State Bank of India, Manaparai, Trichy District, on 12.04.2007, in account No.30293017255, for purchasing Tractor for his agricultural purpose. He had mortgaged title deeds pertaining to his property and on the basis of the security offered by him, the Respondent / Bank had sanctioned the loan for purchasing the Tractor. 3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that due to failure of mon...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »