Chennai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. S. Kalaimathi Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, Health an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to settle the petitioner's increments due till 31.10.2009 and retirement benefits such as DCRG and Pensionary benefits with effect from 01.11.2009 with interest at 10% per annum for the belated payment of retirement benefits from 01.11.2009 till the actual date of payment.) 1. The petitioner joined the services as Assistant Surgeon on 9.4.1979 and she was promoted as Senior Civil Surgeon for the year 2001-2002, consequence of the decision of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal. She was permitted to go abroad from 25.09.1995 to 24.03.1996. 2. As she had overstayed, for the unauthorized absence period from 25.03.1996 to 30.11.1998 a charge was framed under Rule 17(b) of Tamil Nadu Civil Services (D and A) Rules for disobeying the orders of the superiors in not reporting for duty. However, in G.O.(D) No.1152, Health and Family Welfare 1(1) Depar...
Udayakumar Vs. State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, Salem District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Appeal against the judgment, dated 11.03.2015, made in S.C.No.376 of 2012 on the file of Principal Sessions Court, Salem.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.376 of 2012 on the file of Principal Sessions Court, Salem. He stood charged for the offences under Sections 294-B, 307 and 302 IPC. By judgment, dated 11.03.2015, the trial Court convicted him for the offences under Sections 307 and 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs.1,000/-; in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 302 IPC; and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 307 IPC. The trial Court acquitted him from the charge under Section 294-B IPC. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief...
Makpooljohn Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's representation, dated 25.02.2016 pertaining to the issuance of Patta for the land in Resurvey No.204/9, to an extent of 21650 sq.metres, situated at T.S.No.3/12, Ward 'A', Block No.22 in Melur Town, Madurai District, within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement in the Writ Petition to the following effect :- Since the patta has been issued in my name separately, I may be permitted to withdraw this Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Venkatesappa Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri Distric ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri in S.C.No.65 of 2013 dated 29.09.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.65 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri. He stood charged for offences under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Section 302 I.P.C. By judgment dated 29.09.2015, the trial Court convicted him under Section 302 I.P.C. alone and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows: 2.1. The deceased in this case was one Mrs.K.Shyamaladevi. Three and half years prior to the occurrence, the accused married the deceased. It w...
Sankaranarayanan Vs. The Regional Passport Officer, Government of Indi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent issued in Letter No.1300050-CPC-MDU, dated 22.4.2016 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the first respondent to follow the Notification issued by the Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs in G.S.R.No.570(E), dated 25.08.1993 and in the light of the order dated 27.5.2010 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.6623 of 2010.) 1. The Petitioner focussed the instant Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the records of the First Respondent issued in Letter No.1300050-CPC-MDU, dated 22.04.2016 and to quash the same as illegal one and further he has prayed to adhere to the notification issued by the Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs in G.S.R.No.570(E), dated 25.08.1993 and in the light of the order, dated 27.05.2010 passed by ...
The Director, Central Institute of Classical Tamil, and Another Vs. Dr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeals against the common order of this Court dated 07.1.2015 passed in M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2015 in W.P.Nos.12785 to 12788 of 2015.) G. Ramesh, J. 1. These writ appeals have been filed, challenging the order dated 07.10.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in rejecting the prayer of the appellants to vacate the stay granted as against the first respondents in all these writ appeals in M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2015 in W.P.Nos.12785 to 12788 of 2015. 2. The case in brief is as follows: (i) The writ petitioners/first respondents, in these writ appeals, were engaged as Junior Resource Persons in the Central Institute of Classical Tamil, Chennai for a period of one year from 07.04.2014 to 31.03.2015 by the Registrar of the Central Institute of Classical Tamil on contract basis. While so, they were issued with a charge memo dated 09.03.2015 alleging that they have committed misconduct by violating Clause 7(c) of the Code of Conduct, which stipulates that no contractual employee sh...
P. Vasunathan Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Tourism, Culture and Relig ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first Respondent in G.O.(B) No.10, dated 13.01.2015, quash the same. ) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order of punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of six months without cumulative effect imposed on him by the first respondent. 2. The petitioner was recruited by direct recruitment in December 1987, to the first respondent as Executive Officer Grade-I and he was promoted as Assistant Commissioner on 30.06.1995 and thereafter promoted as Deputy Commissioner and posted as Joint Commissioner for the Chennai Region. 3. The Government of Tamil Nadu made an announcement during the budget-session for the financial year 2011-12, to arrange a marriage ceremony for 1006 Hindu couples belonging to economically and socially weaker section of the society hailing from different parts of the State. 4....
R. Paramasivan and Others Vs. The Managing Director, State Express Tra ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to settle the petitioner terminal benefits such as commutation of pension, employees provident fund, surrender leave salary, social security scheme benefits, employees retirement benefits fund benefits, medical, engineering and polytechnic colleges contributions difference of gratuity along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondent Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon...
M/s. Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd, Rep. by its Authorised Signator ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: W.P.(MD).Nos.12174 to 12777 of 2016: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent in his proceedings in TIN No.33305563701/2012-13 and 2013-2014 and quash the order dated 17.03.2016 as it is unlawful and further direct the 1st respondent to grant an opportunity for adjudication and thereafter to pass order afresh in all perspective on its merits in terms of the decision of this Hon'ble Court reported in 9 VST 478/2007.) CommonOrder: 1. Since the issue involved in all the Writ Petitions is one and the same, these matters are taken up together and disposed of, by this common order. 2. M/s. Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd, represented by its Authorised Signatory, Mr. Jeyendra Govindlal Shah, Tirunelveli Junction, challenges the impugned orders, dated 17.03.2016, passed by the first respondent, on the ground that the notice, dated 25.05.2015 was not properly ...
S. Vadamalai Raj Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Chari ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1803/2014/A3, dated 29.6.2016 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents herein from in any way dispossessing the Petitioner from his house property situated at Door No.51, Ward No.19, Varadarajapuram East Street, Cumbum, Theni District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his father Late. Subramania Pillai was a tenant in the house property, more particularly, Door No.51, Ward No.19, Varadarajapuram, East Street, Cumbum, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District for the past 40 years. As a matter of fact, the house belongs to the Third Respondent/Arulmighu...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »