Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.B. Rajarethinam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner herein is a dialysis patient and therefore, the requirement of the petitioner's repeated appearance before the respondent police would cause harassment to him. 4. Per contra, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents has submitted that already the statement of the petitioner has been recorded and his presence is no more required in this case. 5. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of....
T. Pitchaikani Vs. The Special Tahsildar, Virudhunagar District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/1213/1983 dated Nil-05-2013 and quash the same as illegal.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 2. The Petitioner has focussed the instant writ petition before this court seeking to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No. A1/1213/1983 dated Nil - 05-2013 and to quash the same as an illegal one. 3. The Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner was served with the impugned memorandum order in Na.Ka.No. A1/1213/1983 dated Nil- 05-2013, passed by the respondent/Special Tahsildar (Adhi Diravidar Welfare), Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District, whereby and whereunder, the petitioner was informed that he is in occupation of the house and land in S.Nos.30/9, 10, 12,...
Ashwini Anilkumar Vs. State by, The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 407 of Criminal Procedure Code, seeking transfer of S.C.No.220 of 2014 pending on the file of Magalir Needhimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore to any Chennai or other competent Sessions Judge/Magalir Needhimandram.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner herein seeking transfer of S.C.No.220 of 2014 pending on the file of Magalir Needhimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore to any Chennai or other competent Sessions Judge/Magalir Needhimandram. 2. The petitioner is stated to be a rape victim. On her complaint, Police registered a case in Cr.No.10 of 2014 and after completing the investigation, filed a final report and the case now stands trial before the Court of Magalir Needhimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore in S.C.No.220 of 2014. 3. On 26.11.2015, the petitioner and her mother were examined in Chief as P.W.1 and P.W.2. The learned counsel appearing for the accused filed an application under Section 231(2) Cr.P.C. for de...
M. Ranganathan Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner made in the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2016 for quashing the order of dismissal from service issued in RO.No.442/2013 in C.No.B2./PRO9/2001 dated 28.11.2013 and for reinstatement of the petitioner in the light of the similar orders granted to Tr.Rahamadulla Khan in D.O.No.196/2016 in C.No.D2/3297/2012 dated 02.03.2016 within a reasonable time.) 1. By consent, the writ petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage itself. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner made in the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2016 for quashing the order of dismissal from service issued in RO.No.442/2013 in C.No.B2./PRO9/2001 dated 28.11.2013 and to reinstatement of the petitioner in the light of the similar orders granted to...
Raymond Vs. Anton Selvakumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed in Tr.C.M.P.No.544/2015 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli dated 24.07.2015 in C.C.No.276/14 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Valliyoor.) 1. This revision arises out of dismissal of a transfer civil miscellaneous petition by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli. 2. The fight before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor in a cheque bouncing case in C.C.No276/2014 is as between a lawyer and a non-lawyer. Complainant is a Lawyer. The accused is a retired teacher. The calendar case reached the stage of examining the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. The accused apprehending that she may not get fair justice, because no lawyer came forward to defend her, filed Tr.C.M.P.No.554 of 2015 before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli to transfer the case to to any Magistrate's Court in Tirunelveli. 3. The learned Chief J...
Ramesh Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tirupur District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupur, Tirupur District, in S.C.No.3 of 2012 dated 21.06.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.3 of 2012 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupur. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302, 449, 392 and 201 of IPC. After trial, by judgement dated 21.06.2013, the trial court convicted the accused for offences under Sections 302, 449, 392 and 201 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for offence under Section 302 of IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- [no default sentence was imposed] for offence under Section 449 of IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- [no def...
Muthumari Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner and her family members in the guise of enquiry.) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 3rd respondent police not to harass her and her family members in the guise of enquiry. 2. It is seen that a case is pending against the petitioner's husband, namely, Sankarapandi, against whom, several criminal cases are stated to be pending. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has a child aged about 1 years and that she has already appeared before the respondent police in connection with an enquiry and therefore, she may not be called for any further enquiry. 4. There is an undertaking on the side of the respondents that the petitioner will not be called for enquiry, as her presence is no more required in this case. 5. Recording the said undertaking given by the respondents, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
M. Lakshmi and Another Vs. Tamil Nadu State Bhoodan Yagna Board, Repre ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to grant patta to the Petitioner land in S.No.81/1B in an extent of two acres situated at Veeralapatti Branch, Virupatchi Village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District by considering the representation of the Petitioner, dated 28.03.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, she has filed the present Writ Petition seeking for passing of an order by this Court in directing the respondents 1 and 2 to grant patta in her favour in in S.No.81/1B measuring to an extent of two acres situated at Veeralapatti Branch, Virupatchi Village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District by considering her representation, dated 28.03.2016. 4. The Petitioner claims that she belongs to the economically weaker section(Scheduled Caste-Arunthathiyar Community) ...
M. Lakshmi Vs. Tamil Nadu State Bhoodan Yagna Board, Chennai and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to grant patta to the Petitioner land in S.No.81/1B in an extent of two acres situated at Veeralapatti Branch, Virupatchi Village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District by considering the representation of the Petitioner, dated 28.03.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, she has filed the present Writ Petition seeking for passing of an order by this Court in directing the respondents 1 and 2 to grant patta in her favour in in S.No.81/1B measuring to an extent of two acres situated at Veeralapatti Branch, Virupatchi Village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District by considering her representation, dated 28.03.2016. 4. The Petitioner claims that she belongs to the economically weaker section(Scheduled Caste-Arunthathiyar Community) ...
E. Maheshwari Vs. The Director General of Police Tamil Nadu and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to pass orders on the proposal sent by the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent in C.No.J3/27336/2014, dated 13.03.2015 for granting pensionary benefits and other benefits within a reasonable time.) 1. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage itself. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to pass orders on the proposal sent by the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent in C.No.J3/27336/2014, dated 13.03.2015 for granting pensionary benefits and other benefits within a reasonable time. 3. The petitioner's husband entered service as Grade-II Police Constable. He was promoted as Grade-I Police Constable. Against the petitioner's husband, a criminal case was registered in Cr.No.92 of 2001, therefore, he was placed under suspension. A departmental proceeding was also initi...
- ‹ Prev
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 82
- 83
- 84
- Next ›
- Last »