Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mega Star Survey and Consultants India Pvt Ltd. Vs. The Secretary, Min ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 6 from extending or assigning any new project or works relating to the financial year 2015-2016 or thereafter to the 7th respondent without following the process of inviting tenders from the consultancy services for Authority's Engineer for supervision of NH (O) works in the State of Tamil Nadu on EPC mode and consequently issue fresh tenders inviting participation for consultancy services for Authority's Engineer for supervision of NH (O) works in the State of Tamil Nadu on EPC mode for the works for the financial year 2015-2016.) 1. The petitioner seeks for issuance of a Mandamus forbearing the official respondents from extending or assigning any new project works during the financial year 2015-2016 or thereafter to the seventh respondent without following the process of inviting tenders from the consultancy services for Authority's Engineer for super...
Dr.V.S.Dorairaj Vs. The Tamil Nadu Medical Council, Arumbakkam and Oth ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned resolution of the first respondent dated 24.08.2015, quash the same as illegal and consequently forbear the respondents herein from in any way preventing the petitioner from holding and functioning as the President of the Tamil Nadu Medical Council, Chennai till the expiry of his term of office.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition challenging the resolution dated 24.08.2015 passed by the first respondent in and by which the first respondent declared the second respondent as the President of the Tamil Nadu Medical Council in the election conducted on 24.08.2015. 2. The case of the petitioner, as could be culled out from the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is that he was the duly elected President of the first respondent council, which is a statutory body within the State of Ta...
M. Loganathan Vs. State rep. By Inspector of Police, Erode District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 06.02.2014 in S.C.No.110 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Erode convicting the appellant/accused for life imprisonment under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and under Section 377 I.P.C.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.110 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila (Fast Track) Court, Erode stands convicted for offences under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (In short, "the POCSO Act") and Section 377 I.P.C. He has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,05,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for offence under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year for offence under Section 37...
S. Mahalingam and Another Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the Petitioners' representation dated 9.3.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. It is the stand of the Petitioners that they belong to the Kurvavan community(Scheduled Caste) and their father Santhanam expired in the year 2007 and their grand-father Karuppannan expired 40 years back. Their grand-father during his life-time was in enjoyment of S.Nos.206/2A1, 206/2B, Kosakulam Pudur hamlet, Tallakulam Village, Madurai District. Morever, from the year 1928, he was enjoying the property till his demise and thereafter, the Petitioners' father was enjoying the property and subsequently, they are enjoying the property. 4. The plea taken on behalf of the Petitioners is that for more than 88 years, they are enjoy...
S. Palanichamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superin ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to conduct Kangaru Court into the civil dispute between the petitioner and one Mrs.Vijayalakshmi W/o.Balakrishnan.) 1. It is an application seeking a direction to the respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to conduct Kangaru Court, by interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and one Mrs.Vijayalakshmi, W/o.Balakrishnan. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. The petitioner is stated to be a tenant of whom the defacto complainant is the landlord. The landlord gave a complaint to the respondent, the exact details of which, is not available on record. The petitioner herein/tenant appeared before the respondent and has given an undertaking that he would vacate the premises within a period of two months. Thereafter, the counsel for the tenant issued a notice stating that the tenant has spent ...
M/s.A.S. Enterprises Vs. The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai and Othe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to release the imported goods viz., LED Spare Parts for lighting fixtures, Spare Parts for lighting fixtures and Capacitor for lighting fixtures covered under Bill of Entry No.8915658 dated 15.04.2015 in terms of Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.) 1. The above Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release the imported goods viz., LED Spare Parts for lighting fixtures, Spare Parts for lighting fixtures and Capacitor for lighting fixtures covered under the Bill of Entry dated 15.04.2015 in terms of Section 110 (2) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. According to the petitioner, they sought to import LED Spare Parts for lighting fixtures, Spare Parts for lighting fixtures and Capacitors for lighting fixtures from M/s.Zhongshan Zeda Lighting Company Limited, China. The said consignment wa...
Punjab National Bank, represented by its Chief Manager, Chennai Vs. Th ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner-Bank to register the sale certificate executed as and when executed by the petitioner-Bank in favour of the auction purchaser by invoking SARFAESI Proceedings pertaining to the property owned by the third respondent namely undivided share of the land measuring an extent of 500 sq.ft out of 9799 sq.ft together with flat bearing No.D3 in the third floor, having a plinth area of 920 sq.ft which includes common area known as Sowbagya Apartments, situated at Plot No.143, Door No.3, Sathiyanarayana St., Venkatapuram, Ambattur, Chennai-53, forming part of Ambattur Village, comprised in Survey No.621/5, Thiruvallur District, in accordance with law.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner-Bank to register the ...
J. Jeyaraj Vs. The District Registrar, (Administration) Office of the ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings in R.C.No.484/B1/2013 dated 02/2013, signed on 13.03.2013 on the file of the first respondent herein and to quash the same and direct the respondents to release the rectification deed dated 17.11.2011 executed in his favour, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.) The petitioner has preferred the present Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings in R.C.No.484/B1/2013 dated 02/2013 (signed on 13.03.2013) on the file of the first respondent/District Registrar, (Administration), Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli and to quash the same. Further, he has sought for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Respondents to release the Rectification Deed dated 17.11.2011 executed in his favour, within a time frame to be determined by t...
A. Udayasurian Vs. The Chief Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's education loan application dated 18.07.2014 and to sanction education loan for the petitioner's daughter within a stipulated time fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the Petitioner, he belongs to a backward class community viz., Hindu Kaikonar Community and he is a wage based weaver. He has four female children and his third daughter viz., Vijayalakshmi has joined a 3 years Diploma course in General Nursing and Midwifery in Sri Ramachandra Naidu Nursing Training School at Paruvakudi Village, Sankarankovil Taluk and presently studying in 3rd year. 3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he approached the second respondent/Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District for obtaining education loan for his third daughter viz., Vijayalakshmi. He applied for the...
Sivamani Vs. State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, Madurai and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai in Cr.M.P.No.210 of 2015 dated 21.01.2015 and set aside the same and further to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai to grant interim custody of the ingot to the petitioner.) 1. This revision arises out of dismissal of Criminal M.P. No.210 of 2015 filed by the defacto complainant in Crime No.1093 of 2014, previously, on the file of Oomatchikulam Police Station, Madurai now, on the file of Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai. 2. There are A1 and A2 in this case. They are concerned with a robbery case reported in Crime No.1093 of 2014 under Section 392 I.P.C. The revision petitioner/Sivamani/defacto complainant while walking on the road in Pamba Nagar, two unidentified persons came in a motor bike, the pillion-rider snatched her gold chain weighing 5 sovereigns from her neck. The bike sped away along with the criminals....
- ‹ Prev
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- Next ›
- Last »