Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
In re, Equitas Finance Limited represented by its Chief Financial Offi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
1. These are three petitions, filed, to seek sanction of a Scheme of Amalgamation (in short the Scheme), placed before this court by the petitioners herein. CP No. 119/2016 has been filed by Equitas Micro Finance Limited (hereafter referred to as transferor no.1 company), while CP No. 120/2016 has been filed by Equitas Housing Finance Ltd. (hereafter referred to as transferor no.2 company). CP No. 121/2016 has been filed by Equitas Finance Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the transferee company). For the sake of convenience, transferor company no. 1 and 2, and transferee company will be collectively referred to as petitioner companies. 1.1. The scheme envisages the merger of transferor company no. 1 and 2 with the transferee company. In this context, it is noticed that the first prayer in the three petitions is identical. Insofar as company petition No. 191/2016 and 120/2016 are concerned, since these are the petitions filed by the transferor companies, quite obviously, they have made pr...
S. Gopu and Others Vs. The Secretary to the Government of India, New D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.18054 of 2012 dated 28.11.2012.) K. Ravichandrabaabu, J. 1. All these 8 writ appeals are arising out of a common order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.3404, 10261, 13976 and 18054 of 2012. Out of these 8 appeals, four are filed by the respective writ petitioners, while the remaining four are filed by the respondents/Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited. 2. The common issue involved in these cases is in respect of awarding LPG distributorship, by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited at two places viz., Race Course road/Sungam, Coimbatore District and Koduvai, Tiruppur District. The petitioner in W.P.No.3404 of 2012 challenged the final marksheet prepared by the Interview Committee in respect of LPG Distributorship at Race Course/Sungam in Coimbatore District and consequently, for a direction to the respondents to conduct a fresh interview base...
A.S. Anbsar and Others Vs. Majilis-Ul-Ulama Regd. Society Rep. by its ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order, dated 25.04.2016 made in I.A.No.571 of 2016 in O.S.No.566 of 2016 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichirappalli.) 1. This civil revision is filed challenging the order passed by the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichirappalli, dated 25.04.2016 and made in I.A.No.571 of 2016 in O.S.No.566 of 2016. 2. Mr.T.V.Ramanujam, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that the respondents/plaintiffs filed the suit for bare injunction and also filed an application in I.A.No.571 of 2016 for temporary injunction and the learned Subordinate Judge, without giving any reason and without any regard to the Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, passed a cryptic order and therefore, the order is liable to be set aside and the civil revision has to be allowed. 3. Mr.S.Silambanan, learned Senior counsel appearing for ...
A. Subramanian Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioner, dated 12.5.2016 as well as the application of the Petitioner dated 9.3.2016 and consequently to issue patta in the Petitioner's name to the property measuring to an extent of 4 cents bearing S.No.208/4C, in Surakulam Group of Sivagangai, Sivagangai District as per the order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/2454/2013, dated 1.10.2014.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, he purchased the property measuring an extent of 4 cents in S.No. S.No.208/4C, in Surakulam Group of Sivagangai, Sivagangai District from his vendor namely G.Rajam by means of a registered sale deed, dated 11.12.2002. From the date of purchase of the said property, he is in exclusive possession ...
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 24.09.2012 made in W.P(MD)No.12219 of 2012.) Nootyramamohana Rao, J. 1. The learned Special Government Pleader and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent/writ petitioner have drawn our attention to the judgment rendered by the Honourable Division Bench of this Court on 14.11.2014 in W.A(MD)No.1321 of 2014. The reasons have been spelt out in paragraph '7' of the said order. 2. We are in respectful agreement with the reasons assigned by the Honourable Division Bench in deciding the said writ appeal. Hence, the present appeal is also dismissed for the very same reasons as in the W.A(MD)No.1321 of 2014. No costs....
B. Satheesh Kumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry and register the case in complaint dated 15.10.2015 against the proposed accused persons.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry and register a case based on the complaint dated 15.10.2015 against the proposed accused persons. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 15.10.2015, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.62 of 2016 dated 28.04.2016 for an offence under Section 379 IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
A. Jaisankar and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary t ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: W.P.Nos.38537, 38538, 38640 to 38642, 38873 to 38875, 40838, 40839, 40893 to 40895 of 2015 are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the second respondent in his University Order No.928/(C1)/2015 dated 28.11.2015 and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned and direct the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue as Special Officers with all the consequential benefits. W.P.Nos.40414 to 40416 of 2015 are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the Order No.928/(C1)2015 dated 28.11.2015 of the respondent and quash the order passed therein. W.P.Nos.8884 to 8893 of 2016 are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of...
N. Muthiah Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secret ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to pass appropriate orders based on the recommendation made by the fourth respondent by considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 8.7.2015.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, he was elected as Secretary of the Hindu Middle School, Ambasamudiram Taluk, Tirunelveli District and his tenure as Secretary also came to an end. Further, since no parents came forward to admit their children in the said school, they were not in a position to administer the school and develop the same. As a matter of fact, originally 13 teachers were working in the said school and due to the diminishing in the strength of the students, no fresh appointments were made after those teachers attained their age of superannuation. 4. The stand o...
Kala Pethatchi Vs. State rep.by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, in Crl.M.P.No.250 of 2016, dated 20.01.2016 and to return the silver ingots of 6 Kg to the petitioner.) 1. This matter is squarely covered by the Apex Court's Judgment in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat [2003 (1) CTC 175 (SC)]. 2. This revision arises out of dismissal of a property return petition in Cr.M.P.No.250 of 2016, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi. 3. The revision petitioner owns a house in Chettinadu. She is residing in Kottur in Chennai. A property offence has been committed in her Chettinad house. She lodged complaint alleging missing of silver articles. The said complaint has been registered in Crime No.100 of 2014, under Sections 454 (or) 457, 380 I.P.C., by the Chettinadu Police. 4. Later the accused was apprehended. In the course of investigation, the...
M. Raju Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register the petitioner's complaint dated 17.03.2015 and investigate the matter in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register the petitioner's complaint dated 17.03.2015 and investigate the matter in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that already a case has been registered under Section 107 Cr.P.C. in Crime No.79 of 2015. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »