Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd., Chennai Vs. Globecast Asia Pte. Li ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Appeal preferred under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of O.S. Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 9.09.2015 made in C.P.No.7 of 2015.) A. Selvam, J. 1. This Original Side Appeal has been directed against the order dated 09.09.2015, passed in Company Petition No.7 of 2015, by the learned single Judge of this Court. 2. The respondent herein, as petitioner, has filed Company Petition No.7 of 2015, on the file of this Court, wherein it is prayed as follows: "(a) To wind-up M/s.Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd., the respondent herein, under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. (b) To appoint the Official Liquidator, Madras High Court, as the Liquidator of the respondent to take charge of its assets and affairs; and (c) To direct the payment of the costs of this petition from and out of the assets of the respondent upon liquidation." 3. The learned single Judge, after considering the divergent contentions raised on either side, has admitted the petition with...
Kumaresan and Anothers Vs. The State, Rep. By its Inspector of Police, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code against the judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal District, in S.C.No.107 of 2012, dated 13.03.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 and 2 in S.C.No.107 of 2012 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal District. They stood charged for the offences under Sections 302 read with 120 (B) and 364 IPC. 2. By judgment dated 13.03.2015, the trial Court sentenced the first accused to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year, for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C., and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for Life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default, to undergo simple imprisonment, for one year for the offence under Section 120 (B) IPC and also sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo s...
The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary, Rural Development Dep ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 30.06.2014 made in W.P.(MD) No.5686 of 2014 on the file of this Hon'ble Court and allow this Writ Appeal.) 1. Though the Writ Appeal is preferred against the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge in W.P.(MD)No.5886 of 2014, the learned Special Government Pleader has brought to our notice that entertaining a similar lis in W.A.(MD) No.361 of 2016 a Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 03.03.2016 dismissed that Writ Appeal. The Division Bench in turn followed the view taken by another Division Bench in W.A.(MD)No.1028 of 2015 dated 30th September 2015. It is also brought to our notice by the Special Government Pleader that the order passed by this Court in those Writ Appeals has been complied with by the Government. In that view of the matter, we dismiss the Writ Appeal for the same reasons which have been set out in W.A.(MD)Nos.1028 of 2015 and 361 of 2016. No costs. Consequent...
Saravanan Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Kottaipattinam, Pudu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, PCR Court, Pudukottai under the SC/ST Act to consider the bail application on surrender of the petitioner in connection with SC No.31 of 2008 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, PCR Court, Pudukottai on the same day.) 1. This application has been filed seeking a direction to the Court, which is dealing with the SC/ST Act cases to consider the bail application on the day of surrender itself. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. The petitioner is the sole accused in respect of the offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 IPC and r/w 3 (1)(x) of SC/ST Act. Due to non appearance of the petitioner before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, PCR Court, Pudukottai, non bailable warrant came to be issued against the petitioner herei...
R. Palsamy Vs. The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to measure the Petitioner's property in S.No.308/6 and 308/15 of Vendu Rayapuram Village, and issue separate patta by sub-dividing the property within the time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The plea of the Petitioner is that they have their ancestral property in Vendu Rayapuram Village in S.No.308/6, measuring to an extent of 36 cents and in S.No.308/15, measuring to an extent of 19 cents. He and his brothers Nallathambi, Veerapathiran and their mother Vellayammal and sisters Chellammal and Veerammal are the co-parcenors of the said land and they have been in possession of the said land from the period of their grand-father. 4. It comes to be known that in respect of the said property, one Rangalwar Naicker along with his broth...
Petchiammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case/FIR on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 13.09.2014.) 1. It is an application seeking a direction to the third respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 13.09.2014. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that the petitioner is having 1 acre 84 cents of land in S.No.12/3; that the sons of the petitioner had obtained signature in blank paper and have forged settlement deeds in their own favour by impersonation. When this was questioned, the sons abused the petitioner. Since no action was taken on the said complaint, the petitioner has come up with this petition. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that enquiry has been conducted and it...
S. Srinivasan Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Co ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned charge memo in reference No.Ka.Ku.No.175/1750/D7/TNSTC/2014 on the file of the first respondent dated 05.02.2014 and consequential enquiry notices in reference No.44/MD(PA)TNSTC(kovai)2014 on the file of the second respondent dated 20.11.2014 and quash the same.)1. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned charge memo in reference No.Ka.Ku.No.175/1750/D7/TNSTC/2014 on the file of the first respondent dated 05.02.2014 and consequential enquiry notices in reference No.44/MD(PA)TNSTC(kovai)2014 on the file of the second respondent dated 20.11.2014 and quash the same.2. The petitioner joined service as Office Manager Legal in the year 1981. He was promoted as Assistant Manager on 01.05.1982 and further promoted as Deputy Manager legal on 01.05.1988 and as s...
Jegan @ Billa Jegan Vs. The Sub Divisional Magistrate and Sub Collecto ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397(1) r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the order in M.C.No.107/56/16, on the file of the Sub Divisional Magistrate and Sub Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District dated 25.01.2016.) 1. The revision petitioner in this revision challenges the order of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tuticorin passed in M.C.No.107/56/16. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Under Section 107 Cr.P.C. the revision petitioner has been asked to execute a bond to keep peace for one year. This order has been passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer/Sub Collector, Tuticorin in M.C.No.107/56/16. 4. Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. gives revisional jurisdiction to the Court. This revisional power can be exercised by this Court and also by the Sessions Court. It is concurrent. It is pertinent to note that even Court can suo motu exercise its power. In fact under Section 397 Cr.P.C. power of judicial review over the orders of the Executive Magistrate has been g...
S. Sudalaikumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police Tirunelveli District, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to instruct the 3rd respondent to alter the FIR by including the named accused 1.Palraj Nadar, S/o.Jebamani, 2.Padmasingh Selva Meeran S/o.Dharmaraj of Parappadi Village, 3.Dhanasekaran, S/o.Pichamuthu, 4.Kovil Nadar, S/o.Salamon of Thisaiyanvilai, 5.Mary Jeyarani, W/o.Padmasingh Selva Meeran, 6.Vadivu W/o.Arunachalam, 7.Kalyanasundaram, S/o.Swaminathan of Parappadi Village in Vijayanarayanam Police Station, Crime No.73/2016 under Sections 302 of IPC on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 20.05.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report within a period specified by this Court.) 1. It is a petition seeking direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to instruct the 3rd respondent to alter the FIR by including the named accused 1.Palraj Nadar, S/o.Jebamani, 2.Padmasingh Selva Meeran S/o.Dharmaraj of Parappadi Village, 3.Dhanasekaran, S/o.Pichamuthu, 4.Kovi...
D. Rajalakshmi Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to arrange for an alternate pathway to reach the Petitioner's land in S.No.152/7 of M.Reddiyapatti Village, Aruppukkottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District based on the Petitioner's representation, dated 4.3.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, after purchasing 49 cents of land in S.No.152/7 situated at M.Reddiyapatti Village, Aruppukkottai Taluk,Virudhunagar District on 13.8.1987, the revenue records(including patta) also changed in her name and she enjoyed the property peacefully without any third party disturbance. She has also paid the tax in her name. 4. The real grievance of the Petitioner is that she and other neighboring land owners regularly used the Government Union School Pathway ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »