Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ilangovan Vs. State through: The Inspector of Police, Sivagangai Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed by the learned Special Judge Prevention of Corruption Cases, Sivagangai in Cr.M.P.No.137 of 2016 dated 13.05.2016 in C.C.No.1 of 2014.) 1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of his Cr.M.P.No.137 of 2016 filed under 311 Cr.P.C. on the file of learned Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Sivagangai, A2 has directed this revision. 2. A1 to A3 are being prosecuted in the said calender case for certain I.P.C. offences and also for certain white colour offence under Prevention of Corruption Act. The trial of the case is going on and number of witnesses were examined. Now, the I.O. is slated to enter the witness box. 3. At this juncture the said recall petition has been filed. It has been dismissed by the learned Special Judge on the ground that there is delay in recalling the P.Ws. and it is an attempt to derail the trial and it is also a time limit case. 4. The petitioner in...
The Oriental Fire and General Insurance, now known as The Oriental Ins ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree in M.C.O.P.No.87 of 1985, dated 30.06.2003 on the file of the Principal Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nagercoil.) 1. Aggrieved over the award passed by the Principal Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nagercoil in M.C.O.P.No.87 of 1985, the appellant/Insurance Company has preferred the present appeal. 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 13.06.1983 at 8.00 p.m., when the deceased Stanislaus was travelling in a car bearing Registration No.MDT- 6114 from Kovalam to Nagercoil, the car dashed against an electric post. In the impact, the deceased sustained grievous injuries and immediately he was taken to Nagercoil Government Head Quarters Hospital. Thereafter, he was referred to Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital, where he died on 17.06.1983. A claim was made for Rs.95,350/-. 3. The appellant resisted the claim petition contending that the vehicle was not insured...
M. Punniyakotti Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse the payments relating to Gratuity, Commutation, Leave Surrender (Earned Leave and Medical Leave), Settlement Arrears and Settlement Pension Arrears with interest at 12% per annum with effect from 01.03.2014, within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court and to pass such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.) 1. By consent, these Writ Petitions are taken up and disposed of at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioners joined the services of the Transport Corporation and they retired from service long before. The grievance of the petitioners is that though, they retired from service long before, till date, they were not paid with the retirement benefits. In this regard, the petitioners submitted representations before the respondents, on various dates. Howe...
Gopal Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Nilgiris
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging the conviction and sentence imposed against the revision petitioner on his pleading guilty by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Sessions [Fast Track] Court, Udhagamandalam, the Nilgiris District, in S.C.No.45 of 2013 dated 20.08.2014.) 1. The revision petitioner is the sole accused in S.C.No.45 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Sessions [Fast Track] Court, Uthagamandalam. Challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the trial court for offence under Section 302 of IPC, he has come up with this criminal revision petition. 2. The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Lakshmi. The revision petitioner/accused is her husband. There was misunderstanding between the accused and the deceased. It is alleged that on 09.06.2013 at 05.00 a.m., when the deceased was sleeping, the accused killed her by throwing a grinding stone on her head and also by strangulating her neck with a ...
N. Sivaprakasam Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by, The Tahsi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order of the First Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2//11585/2015, dated 27.11.2015 and to quash the same and to direct the First Respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 10.5.2015 for individual patta as per Rule 31 Sub-Clause 13(iii) of the Revenue Standing Order.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. It is not in dispute that the Revenue Tahsildar, Manachanallur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, through his proceedings in Reference No.Na.Ka.A2//11585/2015, dated 27.11.2015, had passed an order in respect of issuance of patta(from that of the joint patta).As against the impugned order of the Revenue Tahsildar, Manachanallur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, dated 27.11.2015, the Petitioner has a viable, effective and effic...
Santhi Vs. The Secretary to Government, Department of Consumer Affairs ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus,calling for the records relating to the order of detention NO. 01/2016 dated 14/01/2016 passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same and also to direct the detenue RAJKUMAR S/O. JEEVANANDAM who is presently detained in the Central Prision PUZHAL to be produced before this court and set at liberty.) S. Nagamuthu.J, 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the wife of the detenu, namely, Rajkumar, aged 30 years, son of Jeevanandam, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in Memo.No.01/Black Marketing/2016, dated 14.01.2016, passed by the 3rd respondent, detaining the detenu, under the provision of Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 (Central Act 7 of 1980), branding him as a Black Marketer, and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the ...
G. Sakthisivananthan Vs. The Regional Deputy Director Tamilnadu Khadi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for records of the first respondent relating to the order dated 21.07.2005, bearing Mu.Mu.No.2880/05-D3 directing recovery of a sum of Rs.46,963/- from the salary of the petitioner, and to quash the same.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned order of the first respondent dated 21.07.2005, bearing Mu.Mu.No.2880/05-D3 directing recovery of a sum of Rs.46,963/- from the salary of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner would state that he was working in Khadi kraft from 21.07.1993 without any blemish or black mark. In March 2002, he was transferred to dyeing, bleaching and printing unit, Bhavani Sagar as a clerk. Every year, for the sale of Khadi during festival, a temporary Khadi sales depot would function at Bhavani Sagar Panchayat Union from October to December for sale of Khadi to the workers of the Unit and other Government Officials (from Deep...
T. Thiagarajan Vs. Finance Account and Chief Account Officer, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for records of the Notification, dated Nil, issued by the 1st respondent, and to quash the examination conducted for the post of Assistant Director (EDP), which was conducted on 21.02.2016 by the 1st respondent and to pass such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage itself. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Notification, dated Nil, issued by the 1st respondent, and to quash the examination conducted for the post of Assistant Director (EDP) on 21.02.2016 by the 1st respondent. 3. The petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Director (EDP) Direct Recruitment and written examination was held by the 1st respondent, on 21.02.2016. The grievance of the petitioner is that till ...
D. Selvapriya Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st Respondent in Che.Mu.Na.Ka.No.1821/A1/2010 dated 07-02-2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to appoint the Petitioner as Anganvadi Assistant at Karaikeni, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.) 1. Mrs. D.Selvapriaya, having lost a chance of getting selected to the post of Anganvadi Assistant at Karaikeni, Anganwadi Centre, Madurai District, in the selection held on 24.09.2010 at the Child Development Project Office, Subramania Kovil Street, Periyur, has come to this Court, challenging the order of appointment issued to the third respondent, by name, Mrs.D.Murugeswari, on the ground that the impugned order of the first respondent in selecting the third respondent and leaving the petitioner is arbitrary and mala fide and therefore, the same is unsustainable in the eye o...
S. Esakkimuthu Vs. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take appropriate action based on the petitioner complaint dated 26.04.2016 for violation of Section 3(V) of SC/ST Act, 1989 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that he was prevented from carrying on the agricultural activities and according to him, he lease out his agricultural land to one Murugan, S/o. Arjunan, who was also prevented from carrying out the agricultural activities, so as to lay the Thar road in his patta land. Also, it is the specific case of the petitioner that the motor pump in the agricultural field was stolen which professed his brother-in-law to lodge a complaint on 30.01.2016 before the Vijayanarayanam Police Station and in this regard, a C.S.R.No.40/16 was issued. H...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »