Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Minor Divya Bharathi, Represented by Her Guardian and Father K. Rajago ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant admission to the Petitioner in BDS Course in the Fourth Respondent College as per the allotment order of the second respondent which is relating to MBBS/BDS-2014-2015 Session.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. No costs....
Abhijeet Chougule Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education, through it ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling the records from the 1st respondent relating to his proceedings CBSE/RO(M)/CORRN/REJN/ 3803/2015 dated 23.02.2016 and quash the same and consequentially further directing the 1st respondent to rectify the name of the petitioner's father in the Grade Sheet cum Certificate of performance issued to the petitioner on completion of X standard in Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1, Dehu Road, Pune and to issue a fresh certificate to the petitioner prior to 26.06.2016 so as to enable the petitioner to produce the same as per the call letter dated 11.05.2016 issued by the Central Airmen Selection Board, Delhi.) (Prayer amended as per order dated 14.06.2016 by MSNJ in WMP No.17274/2016 in W.P.No.18953/2016) 1. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner would state that after finishing schooling, he got admission for B.Com degree course in Indira Col...
S.V.R. Saroja and Others Vs. S.V. Matha Prasad
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Application No.1156 of 2015 has been filed by the applicants under Judge's summons under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Section 151 of CPC, praying to condone the delay of 54 days in preferring appeal against the order dated 17.09.2014 passed in Application No.4969 of 2014 in E.P.No.48 of 1997, passed by the learned Master. Application No.1157 of 2015 has been filed by the applicants under Judge's summons under Order XIV Rule 12 of O.S.Rules r/w Section 151 of CPC, praying to permit them to file appeal against the order dated 17.09.2014 passed in Application No.4969 of 2014 in E.P.No.48 of 1997 by the learned Master. Application No.1158 of 2015 has been filed by the applicants under Judge's summons under Order XIV Rule 12 of O.S.Rules r/w Section 151 of CPC, praying to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the order dated 17.09.2014 in Application No.4969 of 2014 in E.P.No.48 of 1997, passed by the learned Master. Application No.1159 of 2015 has been filed b...
Syed Abudhahir Vs. The District Registrar, Dindigul District and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 18.4.2016 and made necessary entries in the Encumbrance Certificate with respect to the property in T.S.No.730/2 measuring an extent of 1 acre and 8 cents situated at Ward No.1, Dindigul Town.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The Petitioner in his detailed representation, dated 18.4.2016 addressed to the First Respondent/The District Registrar,Dindigul District, had inter-alia prayed in respect of the property in question for making valid entry in the Encumbrance Certificate about the handing over of property through Court and to change the patta etc. 4. It appears that the suit in O.S.No.1891 of 1992 filed by the Petitioner's grand- mother, his maternal uncle and mother before the District Munsif Cour...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
Dr. P. Devadass, J. 1. Mehalingam, party-in-person, who belongs to Thenkarai Village in Periyakulam seeks condonation of delay of 59 days, caused in preferring revision as against the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Theni in Crl.M.P. No.3429 of 2014 in Crl.R.P.No.5 of 2014. 2. The party in person seeks an opportunity. And he requests this Court to condone the said delay. 3. The respondent filed counter. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that now the petitioner's whole exercise is needless, futile and it is taking a toll of public time. 5. I have anxiously considered their submissions and perused the materials on record. 6. Megalingam filed a criminal case against Anitha then R.D.O., Periyakulam with regard to issuance of some certificate with respect to one Aminal @ Aniz Fathima as he thought that some irregularity has been committed. It was taken cognizance in C.C.No.52 of 2013 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam. Anitha wanted to...
S. Velan Vs. State represented by the Inspector of Police, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 08.10.2015 passed in Special Case No.3 of 2015 on the file of the Mahila Court, Chengalpattu.) 1. This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgment dated 08.10.2015 passed in Special Case No.3 of 2015 on the file of the Mahila Court, Chengalpattu. By the said judgment, the appellant/accused was convicted for the offence under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred to as 'POCSO Act') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. 2. Before going into the details of the evidence, the brief case of the prosecution is stated hereunder: (a) P.W.1 lodged a complaint Ex.P-1 stating that her husband P.W.2 is working as Driver and she is having a son by name Sivalingam (P.W.4), aged about 12 years and a minor daughter--P.W.3 victim girl Gayathri alias Muruge...
Thenmozhi Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary to ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of this Court dated 21.01.2013 passed in W.P(MD)No.16306 of 2012.) Nooty.Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. The writ petitioner is the appellant. She sought for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2, namely, the State Government of Tamil Nadu and the Chairman of Teachers Recruitment Board, to appoint the writ petitioner as Graduate Assistant (Chemistry) pursuant to the examination held regarding Teachers Eligibility Test, by taking note of the writ petitioner's qualifications, namely, B.Sc., Food Service Management and Dietetic and Chemistry as equivalent to B.Sc., Chemistry. 2. The State Government has taken out a Notification called 'Tamil Nadu Teacher Eligibility Test (TNTET) - 2012' on 07.03.2012, inviting the candidates for appearing at the Teachers Eligibility Test (in short 'TET'). In paragraph 3 of the Notification, the eligibility to write the test has been specified in the following words: "3. Eligibility to wr...
R. Sudalai Veerapandian Vs. The Principal Accountant General (A and E) ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 3rd respondent pertaining to its order bearing Na.Ka.No. 6746/J1/2016 dated -04-2016 and to quash the same, consequently direct the respondents to pay the pensionary benefits in accordance with the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.13677 of 2011 dated 20.12.2011.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the petitioner, at the time of his retirement on 31.05.1995, he was discharging his duties as a Special Grade Secondary Grade Teacher at Chekarakudi Government Higher Secondary School at Tuticorin. Since there was no promotional opportunity to him in the higher secondary school, at that relevant point of time, G.O.No.216, dated 22.03.1993 was in force. However, it is the case of the petitioner that the second respondent had not implemented the same in his case. In fact, a teacher by name N.Govindarajan (similarly p...
P.G. Girija Vs. The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel), Ch ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to transfer the petitioner as B.T.Assistant (Science) from R.K.R. Government Higher Secondary School, Thirucharai, Thanjavur District to the other school as mentioned in the petitioner's representation dated 06.05.2016 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The petitioner, in her representation dated 06.05.2016, addressed to the first respondent/Joint Director of School Education (Personnel), Chennai, has sought for transfer near about to her old place and the reason assigned by the petitioner inter-alia in her representation is to the effect that she had served for 3 1/4 years at the transferred place at Thirucherai School and also that she is to look after his sick mother, frequently and ultimately, prayed for consideration of her...
Krishna Mandiram Trust, Represented by its Trustees Vs. The District C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2016
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the proceedings of the first respondent made in Na.Ka.J.1/18497/2001 dated 14.8.2002, quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents in any way from running and continuing a wine shop with bar by respondents 3 and 4 or by anyone either by themselves or through their agents, servants, etc., in S.F.No.825 and T.S.Nos.775 and 776 of an extent of 1 acre in Karur Municipal Town, Second Ward (now Ward No.5), 4th Division, Karur in Rani Mangammal Street and Karupayee Koil Street, Karur, Karur District, which is the property of the trust.) 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging an order passed by the first respondent dated 14.8.2002. 2. The petitioner is a trust and claiming ownership over an immovable property in S.F.No.825, Karur Devasthanam Village, Karur Municipal Town, 2nd Ward, 4th Division, the then Karur D...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »