Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Marimuthu Vs. The Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Cudda ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 08.03.2016 made in W.P.No.8187 of 2016 on the file of this Court.) Sanjay Kishan Kaul, C.J. 1. The appellant seeks to assail the order of the learned Single Judge dated 08.03.2016 dismissing the writ petition filed by him assailing the resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the second respondent Society allowing the no confidence motion brought against the appellant in the capacity of the President of the Society. 2. The challenge laid by the appellant was on the ground that the procedure contemplated under Rule 62 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Society Rules, 1988, (hereinafter will be referred to as 'the Rules') had not been followed and that there had been no consideration of the resolution, which was mechanically passed. The appellant, thus, claimed that he was entitled to be heard before the resolution was passed. A plea was also sought to be raised that voting by ineligible members in the ...
I. Mariyammal Vs. The Chairperson/Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chenna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders to grant property situated at Plot No.5, Block B3 at S.No.537/2 of Pandavarmangalam Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin Revenue District under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958, by way of issuing patta to the Petitioner on the basis of the representation dated 13.1.2016 sent by the Petitioner. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders to grant property situated at Plot No.2, Block B4 at S.No.537/2 of Pandavarmangalam Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin Revenue District under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958, by way of issuing patta to the Petitioner on the basis of the representation dated 13.1.2016 sent by the Petitioner.) 1. Hea...
M. Subramanian Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal riginal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to take suitable action against the above accused and consequently provide adequate police protection for the life and limbs of the petitioner and his workmen based on his complaint dated 27.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the 2nd respondent to take suitable action against the above accused and consequently provide adequate police protection for the life and limbs of the petitioner and his workmen based on his complaint dated 27.03.2016. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the complaint dated 27.03.2016 preferred by the petitioner has been closed, on the ground that the matter pertains to civil in nature. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has specifically pointed out that even though the matter is of civil in nature and the same can be decided only by the civil forum, there is a threat from the proposed acc...
P. Subbulakshmi Vs. The Chief Conservator of Forest, Forest Department ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.Pa1/25/2013, dated 12.4.2013 on the file of the Second Respondent and to quash the same and further to direct the first and second respondents to provide employment to the Petitioner's son viz., Essakkivel, on compassionate ground.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs....
Manikandan Vs. State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, Thanjavur Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., against the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahalir Neethimandram, (Fast Track Mahila Nethimandram), Thanjavur in S.C.No.226 of 2013 by judgment dated 13.04.2016.) 1. The sole accused in the Sessions case in S.C.No.226 of 2013, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur, is the appellant. 2. In the Trial Court, he was found guilty under Section 306 IPC and sentenced to 10 years R.I. and fined Rs.5000/-, in default, directed him to undergo 6 months R.I. 3. The case of the prosecution may briefly be stated as under: (i) The deceased is the second daughter of PWs1 and 2. Her sister is PW3. In 2011, the deceased was studying B.C.A. in a college in Kumbakonam. Then, the accused was studying a Diploma course in Kumbakonam. They fell in love. But, it did not long last. The deceased entertained doubt on his love. She avoided him. (...
Savithri Ammal @ Savithri Naidu Vs. The Commissioner, Coimbatore Munic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayers: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to impugned return dated 09.01.2014 in property tax appeal unnumbered filed by the petitioner in respect of property bearing Plot No.9 in a approved layout bearing approval No.T.P/D.T.P.277/64 admeasuring 11792 sq.ft or 27 cents 30 sq.ft comprised in Survey Ward No.1, Block No.32, Old T.S.No.1381 part 1382/2 Tea Estate compound at Race Course, Coimbatore on the file of the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to take the said appeal filed by the petitioner on file for disposal as per provisions of Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to impugned order dated 09.02.2015 bearing Na.Ka.No.116/2015/A6(C) in respect of N...
B.J. Abdul Rahim and Another Vs. The District Collector, Thanjavur Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to issue the patta to the Petitioners with regard to the properties in Karuppur Padugai Village Survey No.s.5/2 measuring an extent of 0.06.5 hectares, S.No.6/1 to an extent of 0.32.0 hectares, S.No.7/2, to an extent of 0.01.0 hectares, S.No.15/1 to an extent of 0.38.0 hectares, S.No.14 to an extent of 0.14.5 hectares, S.No.15/3 to an extent of 0.08.0 hectares, S.No.17/4, to an extent of 0.23.0 hectares and S.No.13/1 to an extent of 0.18.0 hectares.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The grievance of the Petitioners is that they submitted a petition before the First Respondent/The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur on the ''Grievance Day'' seeking issuance of ryotwari patta. Also, for the said petition, acknowledgement, dated 19.9.2005 ...
P. Rajendran Vs. The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 07.12.2015 and consequently, direct the respondents to provide the free electricity connection to the petitioner's name within time frame as may be fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The case of the petitioner is that after his father's demise, he approached the first respondent/Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District for free current connection in his name, based on his father's application dated 23.04.2015. 4. According to him, he had furnished all the necessary documents as well as the father's death certificate and the legal-heir certificate. He had also obtained no objection certificate from his sisters and mother for providing free current connection in his name....
B. Kamalakannan Vs. The Managing Director, Canara Bank, Bangalore and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order of this Court, dated 01.02.2012 made in W.P.No.938 of 2011.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. 1. The instant writ appeal arises from the order, dated 01.02.2012 made in W.P.No.938 of 2011. 2. The facts in nutshell, leading to the filing of the intra court appeal are that the appellant / petitioner served in Canara Bank for about 24 years and opted voluntary retirement, due to his ill health. When he was in service, he took housing loan to the tune of Rs.1,60,000/-. His son, K.Srinivasa Varadhan, availed a Educational loan to the tune of Rs.98,000/- and the appellant stood as co-obligant. After retirement, he settled in Delhi. While he was in Delhi, the appellant's son took second educational loan to the tune of Rs.1,50,000/-, suppressing the earlier educational loan. The appellant also availed other two loans. 3. The appellant is entitled to the pension and his pension was credited to his pension Savings Bank Account. S...
M/s. Karan Traders, Coimbatore and Others Vs. The Joint Commissioner o ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records comprised in Order in Original Sl.No.23/2005-CX (JC) (Denovo) dated 29.12.2015, on the file of the respondent and quash the same.) Common Order: 1. Heard Ms.D.Naveena, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned counsel, who accepts notice for the respondent and with the consent of parties, the writ petitions are taken up for final disposal. 2. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners have questioned the order in Original passed by the Joint Commissioner, dated 29.12.2015. For the purpose of disposal of all these writ petitions, W.P.No.12520 of 2016 is taken up to lead the case. 3. The short issue which falls for consideration is as to whether the respondent/adjudicating officer could have proceeded to conclude the proceedings and pass an order in Original, without affording an opportunity to the petitioners to cross-e...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »