Chennai Court May 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ilyas @ Mohamed Ilyas and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspecto ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records and set aside the dismissal order under Section 91 Cr.P.C. petition filed by the petitioners in Cr.M.P.21 of 2016 in S.C.No.185 of 2010 dated 06.02.2016 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindigul.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records and set aside the dismissal order under Section 91 Cr.P.C. petition filed by the petitioners in Cr.M.P.21 of 2016 in S.C.No.185 of 2010 dated 06.02.2016 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindigul. 2. The petitioners are accused in S.C.No.185 of 2010 for offences under Sections 307, 34 r/w 307 IPC before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul. The prosecution examined 23 witnesses and the accused were questioned under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and two witnesses were examined on behalf of the accused in the year 2013. During the course of final argument, the Trial Judge felt that the charges should be altered and therefor...
P.M. Mahakrishnan Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceeding in No. Nil dated 28.04.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to give permission and protection to the Kompu Madasamy Temple Festival Melaalagu Natchiarpuram, Tirunelveli District.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceeding in No. Nil dated 28.04.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to give permission and protection to the Kompu Madasamy Temple Festival Melaalagu Natchiarpuram, Tirunelveli District. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. It is seen that the representation of the petitioner has been rejected by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kuruvikulam Police Station on the ground of ensuing Assembly election...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›