Chennai Court May 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.P. Arunkumar Vs. State Rep. by its the Deputy Superintendent of Poli ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order dated 28.05.2015 made in Cr.M.P.No.1115 of 2013 in C.C.No.16 of 2012 passed by the Learned Special Judge, Special Court under TNPID Act cases, Coimbatore.) 1. The Petitioner has focused the instant Criminal Revision Petition before this Court as against the order dated 28.05.2015 in Cr.M.P.No.1115 of 2013 in C.C.No.16 of 2012 passed by the Learned Special Judge, Special Court under TNPID Act cases, Coimbatore. 2. The Learned trial Court, while passing the impugned order in Cr.M.P.No.1115 of 2013 in C.C.No.16 of 2012 dated 28.05.2015 in Cr.No.2 of 2012 (filed by the Petitioner/A4 under Section 227 Cr.P.C., praying for Discharge) at paragraph 8 inter-alia had observed that ... Canvassing persons are also responsible for the affairs of the Company of Firm. Hence, considering the materials on record and available evidences, it is not a fit case to discharge the Accused and resultantly, dismissed the Petition...
V.C. Rajendran and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to the case in Crime No.40 of 2016 on the file of the respondent/ complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners / accused and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the case in Crime No.40 of 2016 on the file of the respondent/ complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners / accused. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate [crl.side] appearing for the State. 3. On the complaint lodged by S.Meikan, the Sub Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, the Inspector of Police registered a case in Cr.No.40 of 2016 on 03.02.2016 for offences under Sections 147 and 307 IPC against the petitioners herein, challenging which the petitioners have approached this Court for quashing the FIR. 4. It is the case of the prosecution that on 03.02.2016 around 14.30hrs, the defa...
Esakkiappa Manikaraj @ Raja and Others Vs. State through The Inspector ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the case in S.C.No.393 of 2013 on the file of the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli to the III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to transfer the case in S.C.No.393 of 2013 on the file of the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli to the III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. 2. The petitioners are accused in S.C.No.393 of 2013 for offences under Sections 294(b), 352, 342, 506(ii) and 302 IPC r/w 34 IPC before the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. It is the case of the petitioners that Mr.Thanendran, learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli had recorded the evidence of all the prosecution witnesses in S.C.No.393 of 2013 and that when the matter was posted for defense witness, he has been transferred and posted as III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in the same District and in his place, one Mr.Gladston Blessed Tagore ha...
Ramanujamputhur Arulmigu, Thalavai Nalla Madasamy Thirukovil Paripalan ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to direct the 2 3 and 4th respondents to provide adequate police protection to temple kodai festival called Arulmigu Sri Thalavai Nallamada Samy Temple at Ramanujamputhur Srivaikuntam Taluk Thoothukudi district to be celebrated on 19.05.2016 to 21.05.2016 based on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 16.04.2016 with the respondents.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents to provide adequate police protection to Temple Kodai Festival called Arulmigu Sri Thalavai Nallamada Samy Temple at Ramanujamputhur, Srivaikuntam Taluk Thoothukudi District to be celebrated on 19.05.2016 to 21.05.2016 based on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 16.04.2016 with the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers ...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-04-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Petitioner/Defacto Complainant has filed the present Miscellaneous Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court to permit him to implead as 2nd Respondent and to put forth his submissions in Crl.R.C.No.679 of 2016. Petitioner's Contentions: 2. The Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner/Defacto Complainant cannot be driven out of Court and he, being a victim, has got every right to take part in the prosecution proceedings. 3. The Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner contends that the right of the Petitioner to bring necessary relevant facts and legal issues involved in the case before a Court of Law for better appreciation of the entire gamut of the case and understanding is very much recognised in Law and therefore, in furtherance of substantial cause of Justice, the instant Crl.M.P.No.5232 of 2016 seeking to implead him as 2nd Respondent is to be allowed by this Court. 4. The Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitione...
V.C. Murugan and Others Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to the case in Cr.No.139/2016 on the file of the respondent/complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners/accused.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the case in Cr.No.139/2016 on the file of the respondent/complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners/accused. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate [crl.side] appearing for the State. 3. On the complaint lodged by S.Boopathy, the Sub Inspector of Police, the Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, registered a case in Cr.No.139/2016 on 02.04.2016 for offences u/s 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 353, 332 and 307 IPC r/w Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, 1957 against the petitioners and other accused, challenging which the petitioners are before this Court for quashing the same. 4. It is the case of the prosecution that on 02.04.2016, ...
Mani @ Duraipandi Vs. The Inspector of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records and to quash the FIR in Crime No.180 of 2016 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police as far as the petitioners are concerned in the nature and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records and to quash the FIR in Crime No.180 of 2016 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police as far as the petitioners are concerned in the nature and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience. 2. On the complaint lodged by one Chitra, the Inspector of Police, C-4, Othakadai Police Station has registered a case in Crime No.180 of 2016 on 18.03.2016 for offences under Sections 147, 447, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) IPC against the petitioners herein, challenging which, the petitioners are before this Court for quashing the FIR. 3. It is the case of the defacto compla...
Velpandi Vs. The Inspector of Police, Alankulam Police Station, Virudh ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant permission and protection for cultural event namely Adal Padal scheduled to be held on 22.05.2016 at night in connection with "Vaikasi Festival" in Arulmigu Sri Sakthi Mariamman Kovil at Menanmarinadu Village T.N.C. Alankulam Sivakasi Taluk Virudhunagar District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2016.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondent to grant permission and protection for cultural event namely Adal Padal scheduled to be held on 22.05.2016 at night in connection with "Vaikasi Festival" in Arulmigu Sri Sakthi Mariamman Kovil at Menanmarinadu Village T.N.C. Alankulam Sivakasi Taluk Virudhunagar District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2016. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers jointly decided to conduct Adal Padal on 2...
V.C. Rajendran and Others Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to the case in Cr.No.41/16 on the file of the respondent/complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners/accused.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the case in Cr.No.41/16 on the file of the respondent/complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners/accused. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate [crl.side] appearing for the State. 3. On the complaint lodged by Dawood Hussain, the Sub Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, the Inspector of Police registered a case in Cr.No.41/2016 on 03.02.2016 for offences u/s 147 and 307 IPC against the petitioners herein, challenging which the petitioners have approached this Court for quashing the FIR. 4. It is the case of the prosecution that on 03.02.2016, around 3.00 p.m., when Dawood Hussain, the Sub Inspector of Police and his par...
D.M. Naidu Vs. M. Ramesh Vijayakumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.to set aside the order in Cr.M.P.No.616 of 2016 in C.C.No.103 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Thoothukudi and allow the petition.) 1. This petition has been filed to set aside the order in Cr.M.P.No.616 of 2016 in C.C.No.103 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Thoothukudi. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as the complainant and the accused. 4. The complainant is a banana merchant and that he used to supply banana to the accused, who is into eggs business at Bangalore. It is alleged by the complainant that, on 19.03.2012, the accused came to Tuticorin and borrowed a sum of Rs.3,25,000/- from the complainant for his urgent business requirements and in discharge of said liability, the accused issued a cheque dated 04.02.2013 for Rs.3,25,000/-, which when presented was dishonoure...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »