Chennai Court May 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.R. Periyakaruppan Vs. Jaya Tv Network,Represented by its Authorized ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC to grants an Order of AD-INTERIM INJUNCTION restraining the Respondent herein/Defendant, its associates, sister concerns, its agents, representatives, correspondents, officers, employees and/or any other person claiming through it, entity, in print or electronic media or via internet or otherwise from publishing, republishing, carrying out any further reports or articles or any other matter telecasts or repeat telecasts or programs, or debates or any discussion or reporting of any kind, directly or indirectly, pertaining to alleged NEWS of immoral conduct of the Applicant herein/Plaintiff, pending disposal of the above suit.) 1. Heard the submissions of Mr.T.R.Rajagopal, representing Mr.D.Ravichander, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff and Mr.A.Navaneetha Krishnan, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Defendant. 2. The Plaintiff has filed the above Civil Suit No.282 of 2016 seeking permanent injunction r...
Premkumar and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the PCR Court, Ramanathapuram (Special Court for SC/ST (PA) Act cases), to consider the bail application of the petitioners on the same day of surrender and dispose the same on the same date on merits and in accordance with law in Crime No.15 of 2016.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the PCR Court, Ramanathapuram (Special Court for SC/ST (PA) Act cases), to consider the bail application of the petitioners on the same day of surrender and dispose the same on the same date on merits and in accordance with law, in Crime No.15 of 2016. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, r/w Sections 3(i)(r) and 3(i)(s) of SC/ST (PA) Act, in Crime No.15 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the ...
Chockalingam Palaniappan Vs. Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporat ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 22.01.2016 passed in I.A.No.232 of 2012 in O.S.No.347 of 2009 on the file of Principal District Judge, Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu and consequently allow I.A.No.232 of 2012 in O.S.No.347 of 2009.) 1. This civil revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.347/2009 pending on the file of the Principal District Judge of Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu, questioning the legality of the order of the trial court dated 22.01.2016 made in I.A.No.232/2012 in the above said original suit. 2. The arguments advanced by Mr.PL.Narayanan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and by Mr.K.Azhaguraman, learned counsel for the respondents 8 to 10 were heard. The certified copy of the impugned order, grounds of revision, the counter affidavit of the contesting respondents, the other documents produced in the form of typed set of papers and were also perus...
Devendran and Others Vs. P.V. Palani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the fair and decretal order of the learned District Munsif, Madurantakam made in I.A.No.1330 of 2012 in O.S.No.370 of 2008 dated 12.03.2013.) 1. This revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the defendants in the original suit challenging the order of the trial Court dismissing their application filed under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC seeking permission to file additional written statement. 2. The sole respondent has entered appearance through counsel. The arguments advanced by Ms.C.R.Rukmani, learned counsel for the petitioners and by Mr.N.Nagusah, learned counsel for the respondent were heard. The certified copy of the impugned order and copies of the other documents produced in the form of typed-set of papers were also perused. 3.P.V.Palani, the respondent herein filed O.S.No.370 of 2008 on the file of the trial Court, namely the Court of the District Munsif, Madurantakam,...
S. Sivanu Pandi @ Satha Kutty and Another Vs. Muthu Malaiammal and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.91 of 2007 dated 16.11.2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.243 of 2004 dated 28.11.2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Nanguneri.) 1. The defendants in the original suit are the appellants in the second appeal. N.Muthu Malaiammal and U.Velammal, the respondents herein, filed the original suit O.S.No.243/2004 in the Court of District Munsif, Nanguneri, originally against the first appellant arraying him as the sole defendant. Subsequently, the second appellant Rajammal was impleaded by order dated 14.03.2006 made in I.A.No.147/2004 and ranked as defendant No.2. The suit was filed for : (i) a declaration that the respondents/plaintiffs were entitled to the plaint second schedule property which was part of the plaint first schedule property and also for recovery of possession of the ...
Arun and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Dind ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Court, (PCR) Dindigul to consider the bail application of the petitioners / accused to be filed in Crime No.105 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and to accept their surrender on the same day on merits.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Court, (PCR) Dindigul, to consider the bail application of the petitioners on the same day of surrender and dispose of the same on the same date on merits and in accordance with law in Crime No.105 of 2016. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST Act in Crime No.105 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said Act, the petitioners cannot move any anti...
M.S. Balan Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents from deceiting election candidates, agents, servers and workers from using commercial vehicles as passenger vehicles for electoral purpose.) 1. This writ petition in public interest is filed by a voter from Nilakottai to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to permit candidates, agents and workers from using Commercial Vehicles as Passenger Vehicles for election purpose in violation of the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that candidates of all parties, their agents and workers are using commercial vehicles as passenger vehicles in connection with the election work in violation of Section 192-A of the Motor Vehicles Act. Since there is a large scale violation, the petitioner submitted a representation to the respondents, through lawyer on 28.04.2016. However, the respondents have not taken any con...
Supreme Cot-Spin Mills (India) Pvt.Ltd. Vs. The Chairman, TANGEDCO, Ch ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-05-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in Lr.No.SE/CEDC/S/CBE/DFC/AO/REV/AS/F.HT 377/D.1432/15 dated 14.12.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to pay the arrears of Rs.60,58,498/- in 10 equal monthly instalments along with restoration charges and other charges and restore supply on payment of the first respondent.) 1. This writ petition is posted today pursuant to the permission given by the learned judge on 28.04.2016 to post the matter before the first vacation court on 04.05.2016. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. BRIEF FACTS: 3. The petitioner availed HT service connection bearing No.377 for the purpose of operating a spinning mill at No.419-1A, 1C, Vadugapalayam Road, Thekkalur Post, Avinashi, in the District of Coimbatore. The petitioner failed to pay the current consu...
Loganathan Vs. The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Trichy District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. calling for the records and set aside the order dated 21.01.2016 in Cr.M.P.No.3262/2015 in Cr.R.C.SR.332/16.11.2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Thiruchirappalli and condone the delay of 69 days in preferring the criminal revision petition.) 1. This petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 21.01.2016 passed in Cr.M.P.No.3262/2015 in Cr.R.C.SR.332/16.11.2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Thiruchirappalli and condone the delay of 69 days in preferring the criminal revision petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate [crl.side] appearing for the State. 3. The petitioner was working as Sub Inspector of Police, Traffic Investigation Wing, Trichy during 2002. A motor vehicle accident took place on 03.07.2002, in connection with which, on the complaint of one Rangasamy, a case in Cr.No.502/2002 was registered by the Motor Vehicles ...
Solomon @ Solomon Dhanaraj Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of P ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli (PCR Court) to consider the bail application of the petitioner/A4 in Crime No.118 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of surrender on merits and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli (PCR Court) to consider the bail application of the petitioner/A4 in Crime No.118 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of surrender on merits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 307, 506(ii) r/w 3(1)(r) and (s) of SC/ST Act in Crime No.118 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said Act, the petitioner cannot move any anticipatory bail application a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »