Chennai Court May 2016 Judgments
Traffic Dr.K.R. Ramaswamy Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner of India ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-18-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representations dated 15.05.2016 and 16.05.2016 made by the petitioner within stipulated time period as may be fixed by this Court.) K. Kalyanasundaram, J. and D. Krishnakumar, J. 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representations of the petitioner dated 15.05.2016 and 16.05.2016. 2. The Writ Petition is filed by the party-in-person alleging that the Tamil Nadu State Legislative Assembly Election was announced by the respondents 1 and 2; that as per the statement of the second respondent about Rs.100 Crores of unaccounted money was seized in Tamil Nadu and above 50% of the amount was unclaimed and in this regard several cases were registered by the Tamil Nadu Police based on the complaint by the...
Tag this Judgment!Surya Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ho ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-17-2016
(Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records, relating to petitioner's sister's son detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 04.01.2016 on the file of the second respondent herein made in proceedings C3.D.O.No.2/2016, quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce petitioner's sister's son, namely, Eli (a) Saravanan son of Sivalingam, aged 24 years before this Court and set petitioner's sister's son at liberty from detention, now petitioner's sister's son detained at Central Prison, Vellore.) K. Kalyanasundaram, J. and D. Krishnakumar, J. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the aunt of the detenu, namely, Eli @ Saravanan, son of Late Sivalingam, aged 24 years, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records, in C3.D.O.No.02/2016 dated 04.01.2016, passed by the second Respondent, d...
Tag this Judgment!M. Indra Vs. The Director, Institute of Mental Health
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-13-2016
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature of Writ by quashing the impugned order in e/f/vz;/2729/ep4/2014 dated Nil.11.2015 issued by the respondent and to appoint the petitioner in the suitable job at Institute of Mental Health, Chennai 10, under compassionate grounds, arising due to the death and pass such further or other orders.) 1. The petitioner viz., M.Indra, W/o.M.Ramakrishnan, is the daughter of the deceased M.Pushpa who worked as II Grade Female Attendant in the Institute of Mental Health, Kilpauk, Chennai 10 and she died in harness on 28.11.2008. The petitioner's father Munnusamy already died on 06.01.1991. 2. The petitioner's mother left two legal heirs namely; (1) M.Manjula and (2) M.Indira. The elder sister of the petitioner herein M.Manjula is a mentally retarded patient and she has been diagnosed as behavioural problem with seizure disorder....
Tag this Judgment!R. Vijayakumar Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-12-2016
(Prayer:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, Directing the respondents to settle the petitioner retirement benefits including Leave Salary Gratuity Commutation Dearness Allowance arrears and previous Leave surrender etc. with interest at the rate of not less than 12% per annum payable from the date of retirement and consequently directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum for the belated settlement of retirement benefits to the petitioner payable from the date of retirement i.e. 31.05.2015 to till date of actual payment to the petitioner within the time that may be stipulated by this Honble Court.) 1. The petitioner, R.Vijayakumar, has filed this writ petition for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the petitioner retirement benefits including Leave Salary Gratuity Commutation Dearness Allowance arrears and previous Leave surrender etc. with interest at the rate o...
Tag this Judgment!G. Balaskanthan Vs. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-12-2016
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, Directing the respondents to settle the petitioners retirement benefits including Leave Salary gratuity commutation and settlement arrears etc. with interest at the rate of not less than 18% per annum payable from the date of retirement and consequently directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the belated settlement of retirement benefits to the petitioner payable from the date of retirement i.e. 30.04.2015 to till date of actual payment to the petitioner within the time that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. The petitioner, G.Balaskanthan, has filed this writ petition for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to settle the petitioners retirement benefits including Leave Salary gratuity commutation and settlement arrears etc. with interest at the rate of not less than 18% per annum payable from the date of...
Tag this Judgment!2D Entertainment Pvt.Ltd. Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition No.17268 of 2016 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 herein to process the application dated 02.05.2016 for exemption of entertainment tax made by the petitioner for the movie "24" by forming a committee to view the film and further to pass an order based on the recommendations of the said committee within a reasonable time fixed by this Court.) Common Order 1. Since both the writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner seeking a common relief, both the writ petitions are disposed by this common order. 2. The prayer in W.P.No.17268 of 2016 is to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 herein to process the application dated 02.05.2016 for exemption of entertainment tax made by the petitioner for the Tamil Movie "24", by forming a committee to view the film and further to pass an order based on the recommendations of the said committee within a reasonable time fixed by th...
Tag this Judgment!Velusamy Vs. The Commissioner, Tiruppur City Municipal Corporation and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned show cause notice issued by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.C1/426/2016 dated 20.4.2016 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to sanction the time scale of pay to the petitioner as fixed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.C1/6559/2013, dated 04.01.2014 in accordance with the orders issued in Govt. Letter No.63305/Pay Cell/2010-1, Finance Department, dated 8.11.2010.) 1. The Writ Petitions have been filed challenging the impugned show cause notice issued by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.C1/426/2016 dated 20.04.2016 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to sanction the time scale of pay to the petitioner as fixed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.C1/6559/2013, dated 04.01.2014 in accordance with the orders issued in Govt. Letter No.63305/Pay Cell/2010-1, ...
Tag this Judgment!P. Dayalan Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Sec ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-12-2016
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, Directing the respondents 2 to 4 to settle the petitioners retirement benefits such as gratuity amount commuted value of pension Encashment of Leave Salary (EL) Encashment of Leave Salary (ML-98) Pension Arrears amount and PF (Provident Fund) Arrears Amount after duly taken into account the enhanced dearness allowance and settlement benefits with 18% interest on delayed payment to the petitioner from 30.09.2014 the date of retirement to till the date of settlement of the terminal benefits to the petitioner by following the order passed in W.A.(MD)Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015.) 1. The petitioner, P.Dayalan has filed this writ petition for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 4 to settle the petitioners retirement benefits such as gratuity amount commuted value of pension Encashment of Leave Salary (EL) Encashment of Leave Salary (ML-98) ...
Tag this Judgment!Karuppa Konar @ Porikarar Karuppa Konar (Deceased) and Others Vs. Chin ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree of the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore dated 14.01.1992 made in O.S.No.230 of 1987.) 1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and preliminary decree of the trial court in O.S.No.230/1987 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore granting the relief of partition directing division of the 1st and 3rd item of the suit properties into two equal shares and allotment of one such share to the plaintiff therein. The appeal came to be disposed of by a previous judgment dated 08.02.2007, by which this court had allowed the appeal, set aside the preliminary decree passed by the trial court and dismissed the suit. Contending that there was an error apparent on the face of the record in the said judgment, the respondents 4 to 8 herein filed a Review Application in Review Appln. No.109 of 2007. The said Review Application was allowed by order dated 04.0...
Tag this Judgment!Felix Selvarajan Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the learned II Additional District Judge-cum-PCR Court, Tirunelveli District, to consider the bail application of the petitioner on the same day on merits in the event of his surrender in connection with Crime No.173 of 2016, on the file of the second respondent.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the learned II Additional District Judge-cum-PCR Court, Tirunelveli District, to consider the bail application of the petitioner on the same day on merits in the event of his surrender in connection with Crime No.173 of 2016, on the file of the second respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Section 294(b) of IPC, Section 4 of TNPWH Act and Section 3(i)(r) and 3(i)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 2015, in Crime No.173 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »