Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalavathy Vs. The Secretary, Home Department and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent by its G.O.(D)No.911 Home (Pri.III)Department dated 16.12.2015 and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant parole for a period of 6 months to the petitioners husband, namely, C.Raja, S/o.Chelladurai (C.P.No.10253) now detained as convicted prisoners in Central Prison Trichy.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent by its G.O.(D)No.911 Home (Pri.III)Department dated 16.12.2015 and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant parole for a period of 6 months to the petitioners husband, namely, C.Raja, S/o.Chelladurai (C.P.No.10253) now detained as convicted prisoners in Central Prison Trichy. 2. The petitioner is the wife of Raja, Life Convict Prisoner No.10253, who is presently lo...
T. Sumathi and Others Vs. M/s. National Insurance Company Limited and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer in both CMAs: Both the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the fair and decreetal order dated 21.09.2015 passed in MCOP.No.80 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / District Court, Sivagangai.) Common Judgment: 1. Both the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 21.09.2015, made in MCOP.No.80 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / District Court, Sivagangai. 2. By the consent of both parties, the appeals are taken up for hearing and disposed of by this Common Judgment. 3. The appellants in CMA(MD).No.243 of 2016 / claimants filed MCOP.No.80 of 2010, claiming a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- as compensation for the death of one Thangaraj. The first respondent in CMA(MD).No.243 of 2016 is the appellant in CMA(MD).No.309 of 2016. The respondents 2 to 5 in CMA(MD).No.243 of 2016 are the respondents 6 to 9 in CMA(MD).No.309 of 2016 and they are legal heirs ...
O. Selva Kumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint dated 10.3.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to take action against the accused persons in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint dated 10.3.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to take action against the accused persons in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 10.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 10.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with...
Sahaya Amutha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the case and investigate the matter based upon the complaint sent by the petitioner dated 16.03.2016 and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the case and investigate the matter based upon the complaint sent by the petitioner dated 16.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 16.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 18.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
K. Renjees Mary Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the investigation in Crime No.250 of 2011 on the file of the 2nd respondent police to any other competent independent investigating agency more particularly to CBCID for fair investigation and to file additional final report by including the 2nd and 3rd accused.) 1. This petition has been filed to transfer the investigation in Crime No.250 of 2011 on the file of the 2nd respondent police to any other competent independent investigating agency more particularly to CBCID for fair investigation and to file additional final report by including the 2nd and 3rd accused. 2. When this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer of the petitioner on merits, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. Permission is granted. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the pet...
M/s. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. V. Subashri and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the judgment and decree passed in MCOP No.4068 of 2011 on 14.11.2013 on the file of the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (VI-Judge), Small Causes Court at Chennai.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. The appellant/Insurance Company has filed this appeal challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.4068 of 2011, dated 14.11.2013 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (VI Judge) Small Causes Court, Chennai. 2. It is a case of fatal accident. On 17.08.2011 at about 09.15 hours, while the deceased V.Rajagopal was riding his motor cycle from south to north on the East Coast Road near Kottivakkam, the bus bearing Registration No.TN 21 AB 9229, proceeding in the same direction driven in a rash and negligent manner, came from behind and dashed against the motor cycle in which the deceased was riding, due to which, the deceased suffered grievous injuries and died on the spot. A case was registe...
M.P. Subburaman Vs. S. Raja and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18 of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1975 against the order and decreetal order of the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority, Devakottai, in R.C.A.No. 17 of 1990 dated 27.11.1992 reversing the order and decreetal order of the learned Rent Controller, Devakottai in R.C.O.P.No.32 of 1989 dated 27.11.1990. Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18 of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1975 against the order and decreetal order of the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority, Devakottai, in R.C.A.No. 18 of 1990 dated 27.11.1992 reversing the order and decreetal order of the learned Rent Controller, Devakottai in R.C.O.P.No.33 of 1989 dated 27.11.1990.) 1. The revisions are directed against the order and decreetal order passed by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority, Devakottai, in R.C.A.Nos. 17 and 18 of...
T. Dhanalakshmi Vs. S. Kumaresan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: The civil miscellaneous appeal is filed under Section 19 of Family Court Act 1983 against the order dated 13.07.2012 made in H.M.O.P.No.364 of 2006 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai.) N. Kirubakaran, J. 1. The appeal has been filed by the wife against the decree of divorce dated 13.7.2012 granted by the Family Court, Madurai in H.M.O.P.No.364 of 2006 filed by the respondent/husband. The respondent and the appellant got married on 30.08.2001. Right from the beginning, the marital relationship was not cordial. Therefore, the appellant went to her parents' house and stayed their often. A child was born. Many conciliations were made during two years period of marital life. 2. Since the appellant/wife deserted the respondent and caused mental cruelty, divorce petition was filed on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The appellant resisted the divorce petition on the ground that the respondent alone caused mental cruelty to her by demanding more dowry. She contended that the...
Nagalingam Vs. Santhi and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2001, made in M.C.O.P.No.52 of 1999, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Sivaganga.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2001, made in M.C.O.P.No.52 of 1999, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Sivagangai. 2. The appellant is the claimant. The first respondent is the owner of the ambassador car and the second respondent is the insurer of the said car, which caused the accident, insured with the second respondent. The appellant filed claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.52 of 1999, claiming a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in the accident that took place on 15.02.1996. The Tribunal, by judgment and decree, dated 10.07.2001, directed the first respondent to pay a sum of Rs.56,200/- as compensation to the appellant and di...
S. Jeya Vs. The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents herein not to harass the petitioner on the guise of investigation and not to interfere in the Family Dispute.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents herein not to harass the petitioner on the guise of investigation and not to interfere in the Family Dispute. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on the complaint given by one Eanjalin Yogarani against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, she shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner aga...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »