Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
S. Manoj Prabhakar Vs. The Secretary to Government Health and Family W ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: WP No. 9947 of 2015:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to enable the petitioner, having registration No. 52108368, to obtain permanent registration of M.B.B.S. course with the second respondent by providing him temporary registration certificate with the second respondent and CRRI training during 2015-2016 to be completed before 31st March 2016 in the fifth respondent college or any other approved medical college hospital within Chennai.) Common Order: In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners seek for identical relief. The learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioners as well as the respondents have advanced common arguments. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of by this common order. 2. In all these writ petitions, almost identical prayers have been sought for. The petitioners, in unison, have prayed for issuing a direction to the respondents to recognise their M.B...
Tag this Judgment!S. Shylajan Vs. S. Ramarajan and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the District Judge, Kanyakumari Division at Nagercoil to take on file the unnumbered I.A filed in S.R.No.1462 of 2016, dated 18.03.2016 in M.H.O.P.No.298 of 2015 and number it and dispose of the same within the time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. This revision challenges the return of unnumbered I.A filed in S.R.No.1462 of 2016 in M.H.O.P.No.298 of 2015, dated 18.03.2016 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and perused the materials on record. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner would restrict the prayer in the I.As to that of impleading the Petitioner as a party in M.H.O.P.No.298 of 2015 and for removal of the person appointed from the position of guardian of the mentally ill person Madhavan, by revocation of the order appointing him as such. 4. In the light of the above submissions, the District Judge, Kanyakumari Division at Nagercoil shall tak...
Tag this Judgment!Revathi Vs. State through The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No.23 of 2016 pending on the file of the respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No.23 of 2016 pending on the file of the respondent police. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.23 of 2016 and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expeditiously as possible....
Tag this Judgment!Balasubramanian @ Kannan and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the First information Report pertaining to the case in Crime No.79 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.183 of 2016 dated 31.03.2016 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Karaikudi North Police Station, Sivagangai District and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in C.C.No.39 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in P.R.C.No.29 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in C.C.No.540 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, S...
Tag this Judgment!K. Reddyvaraprasad Vs. K.R. Shanmugam and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Revision filed under Sections 397, 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.2342 of 2015 dated 3/12/2015 on the file of the Honourable Principal Session Court, Krishnagiri, in respect of the observation relating to the order in I.A.No.762 of 2015 dated 27/11/2015 on the file of the Court of District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri.) 1. The Revision Petitioner/Intervening Petitioner/Defacto Complainant has focused the instant Criminal Revision Petition before this Court, as an 'aggrieved person', as against the Order, dated 3/12/2015 in Crl.M.P.No.2342 of 2015, passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, pertaining to the observation made in I.A.No.762 of 2015, dated 27/11/2015, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Krishnagiri. 2. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the Fourth Respondent. 3. Th...
Tag this Judgment!Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/A.4. 2. It appears that the Revision Petitioner/A.4 has filed the instant Criminal Revision Petition, as against 'A Diary' Order, dated 1/4/2016, which runs as under:- A.1 to A.3, A.5 to A.7 present. NBWs against A.4 and A.5 ordered to be issued on 27/1/2016. On 29/1/2016 NBW ordered against A.5 is recalled. A.4 has obtained Anticipatory bail from the Honourable High Court as early as on 10/2/2016 and the said order copy was received by this Court on 1/3/2016. After a month time, he is yet to appear before this Court, vide Crl.O.P.No.2569 of 2016. Thereafter, another Order pertaining A.4 is received to the effect that two months extension of time was granted order date 14/3/2016 the said Order is received on 30/3/2016. Today, it is represented that he (A.4) has against filed another petition for further extension of time. Hence in the stated circumstances and this case is more than 10 years old case against A.4 is orde...
Tag this Judgment!J. Gopalakrishnan Vs. M. Latha
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order inI.A.No.726 of 2015 in H.M.O.P.No.826 of 2014, dated 22.3.2016, on the file of the learned Family Judge, Madurai.) 1. By way of this revision, the Petitioner/husband seeks to set aside the order directing him to pay Rs.4,000/-p.m as maintenance to the respondent/wife. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 3. The couple, who have no issues, are living separately. While so, the Petitioner herein preferred H.M.O.P.No.826 of 2014, seeking divorce. The grounds canvassed towards setting aside the order is that the respondent/wife already is in receipt of maintenance of Rs.4,000/-p.m.. 4. It has been the contention of the respondent/wife that the same was directed to be paid towards rent. The respondent has produced proof of the Petitioner being an employee of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, receiving monthly salary ...
Tag this Judgment!Karthikeyan Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Sriranga ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to file a final report in Crime No.633 of 2014 on the file of the respondent in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondent to file a final report in Crime No.633 of 2014 on the file of the respondent in accordance with law. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.633 of 2014 and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expeditiously as possible....
Tag this Judgment!S. Amudha Christy Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to file a final report in Crime No.991 of 2015 within a time frame fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondents to file a final report in Crime No.991 of 2015. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.991 of 2015 and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expeditiously as possible....
Tag this Judgment!G. Ravi Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.18/2016/A2 dated 18.04.2016 served on 23.04.2016 and quash the same and pass further order as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. prayer in this Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.18/2016/A2 dated 18.04.2016 served on 23.04.2016 and quash the same. 2. Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.M.Rajarajan, takes notice for the third respondent. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The show-cause notice is sought to be challenged here. The main ground is that earlier, the petitioner came forward with the writ petition in W.P(MD)No.6801 of 2016 and this Court granted an interi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »