Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Elisabeth Rani Vs. The Chief Secretary to Government, Puducherry an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to direct the respondents to grant emergency leave for 7 days to S.Manikandan (Life Convict No.4954, Presently serving life sentence at Central Prison-Puducherry), by considering the rejection order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 29.03.2016.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed praying that this Court may pass appropriate orders, directing the respondents to grant emergency leave for 7 days to S.Manikandan (Life Convict No.4954, Presently serving life sentence at Central Prison-Puducherry), to visit his mother, residing at No.104, Fransuva Thoppu, Vanarapettai, Puducherry, by considering the request of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner, who is the wife of Manikandan, son of Sugunaraj, a life convict, bearing Life Convict No.4954, serving life sentence at Central Prison, Puducherry, has stated that the mother of her husband, Manikandan, ...
K. Krishnan Vs. A. Valarmathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 15.09.2011, made in I.A.No.432 of 2011 in O.S.No.195 of 2010, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Salem.) This Civil Revision Petition arises against the fair and decreetal order dated 15.09.2011, made in I.A.No.432 of 2011 in O.S.No.195 of 2010, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Salem. 2. The petitioner herein filed O.S.No.195 of 2010, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Salem. The revision petitioner entered into a registered sale agreement dated 02.07.2008, with the defendant in respect of the suit property for a sale consideration of Rs.8,00,000/-. 3. A written statement was filed by the defendant / the respondent herein, denying the allegations of the plaintiff. 4. The case was posted for cross-examination of PW1. At that stage, the petitioner came to know that the possession of the agreement property has not been asked for and by inadvert...
S. Kannan and Another Vs. State represented by the Deputy Superintende ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the Order passed by the learned Special Judge/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvallur, dated 11.04.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.2120 of 2015 in Spl. C.C.No.10 of 2010 and allow this Criminal Original Petition.) 1. This matter arises out of a sent for petition filed under Section 91 Cr.P.C. 2. Though a routine question had been cropped up, but it is put up in a new fashion, question of right of defence, extent of defence, constitutionally guaranteed right of the accused under Article 22(1) had shown. 3. Petitioners/accused are being prosecuted for their alleged commission of certain white collar offences before the learned Special Judge under PC Act/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvellore. Investigation completed. Prosecution package has been produced. Charges were framed. Now, the stage is set for trial of those charges. 4. At this juncture, in the Trial Court, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.2120 of 201...
T. Sajitha and Others Vs. Union of India rep.by the Chief Secretary to ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to O.A.No.1377 of 2013 dated 10.03.2015 passed by the fourth respondent and to allow the same. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to OA No.1231 of 2013 dated 10.03.2015 passed by the fourth respondent Tribunal to allow the same.) Common Order: Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioners and the learned Special Government Pleader representing the Union Territory of Puducherry. 2. The petitioners, aggrieved by the common order dated 10.03.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench in O.A.Nos.1377 of 2013 and 1231 of 2013 have preferred these writ petitions seeking to quash the same. 3. The brief facts of the case is as follows: (i) By Notificati...
Omprakash Triloki Chandwani Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu represented by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to G.O.No.SR.1/65-3/2015 and SR.1/65-7/2015 dated 22.07.2015 passed by the first respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondent to produce the body of the detenu namely Omprakash Triloki Chandwani and Pritpal Singh Kalsi, respectively, now detained in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, under section 3[1][i] of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities [COFEPOSA] Act before this Court and set them at liberty forthwith.) Common Order: K. Kalyanasundaram, J. 1.The petitioners herein have been detained in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, in pursuance of the detention order passed by the 1st respondent under section 3[1][i] of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 [Central Act 52 of 1974] in G.O.No.SR.1/65-3/2015 and SR.1/65-7/2015 dated 22.07.2015. They...
Senraj Vs. The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
A. Selvam, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to detention order passed in Cr.M.P.No. 01/2016 (VIDEO PIRATE) dated 11.01.2016 by the detaining authority, who has been arrayed as second respondent herein against the detenu by name Prakash, Son of Senraj and quash the same. 2. The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar Video Piracy Cell Unit as sponsoring authority has submitted an affidavit to the detaining authority, wherein it is stated that the detenu has involved in the following adverse case: "Crime No. 146 of 2015 on the file of Coimbatore VPC registered under Sections 51(a)read with 63, 52(A) read with 68, 65 of Copyright Act, 1957 and under Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code". 3. Further it is stated in the affidavit that on 30.12.2015 one Moovendran as de facto complainant has given a complaint against the detenu in Virudhunagar Video Piracy Cell Unit and the same has been registered ...
N. Raju Vs. V.N. Krishnasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order passed by the learned Principal and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur in Crl.M.P.No.1212 of 2016 in C.A.No.32 of 2016 dated 04.04.2016.) 1. The Petitioner/Appellant has filed the instant Criminal Revision Petition before this Court as against the order dated 04.04.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.1212 of 2016 in C.A.No.32 of 2016 passed by the Learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur. 2. The Learned Principal and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur while passing the impugned order in Crl.M.P.No.1212 of 2016 in C.A.No.32 of 2016 on 04.04.2016 had observed the following: This petition filed u/s.389(1) of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Magisterial Level No.II, Poonamallee in S.T.C.No.100 of 2013 dated 15.02.2014. The Petitioner herein has been convicted and sentenced to undergo S.I. for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- in default t...
A. Riyas Vs. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District in C.C.No.224 of 2011 to consider the warrant recall petition filed by the petitioner on the same day of surrender.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District in C.C.No.224 of 2011 to consider the warrant recall petition filed by the petitioner on the same day of surrender. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. The respondent police registered a case in Crime No.12 of 2006 and after completing the investigation, filed a Charge Sheet in C.C.No.126 of 2006 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur against six accused, of which, the petitioner is the 5th accused. Since the respondent was not able to...
V. Varadharajan Vs. State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent police to investigate the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.11.2015 under the supervision of the 7th respondent and secure the accused for custodial interrogation and secure the money of the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to investigate the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.11.2015 under the supervision of the 7th respondent and secure the accused for custodial interrogation and secure the money of the petitioner. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on the complaint given by one Rajaram against Ramajeyam and Co., the District Crime Branch, Thanjavur has registered a case in Crime No.40 of 2015 under Sections 406 and 420 IPC and Section 5 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments Act, 1997) and thereafter, a proposal ha...
V. Sandal Muthuraj Vs. The District Collector and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: in W.P (MD) No.13501 of 2013 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent vide his proceedings in A.6/3168/2013 dated 09.07.2013, and quash the same. Prayer in W.P (MD) No.13630 of 2015 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records and quash the proceedings of the Panchayat Meeting allegedly held on 10.03.2015 by the Tashildar, Radhapuram and the order of the District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats, Tirunelveli District vide his proceedings No.A.6/3168/2013 dated 15.07.2015 [Served on me on 25.07.2015] and the consequent Notification in the District Gazette vide No.155 and Proceedings No.VI (2) 121(a) 2015 dated 23.07.2015 [served on the petitioner on 25.07.2015], Removing the petitioner from the Post of President of Kudankulam Panchayat.) Common...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »