Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Selvam Vs. State by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Referred Trial under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Coimbatore, in S.C.No.126 of 2014 dated 17.03.2015. Crl.A.No.409 of 2015:- Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Coimbatore, in S.C.No.409 of 2015 dated 17.03.2015.) Common Judgement S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Coimbatore, by judgement dated 17.03.2015 in S.C.No.126 of 2014, has convicted the appellant/accused for the offences under Sections 449, 302 (Three Counts) IPC and 404 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 449 of IPC; to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six mo...
Raja Sekar Vs. State rep. By Inspector of Police, Salem
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed in S.C.No.81 of 2011, dated 08.11.2011 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court No.2, Salem, convicting him under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and also imposed fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to set aside the same by acquitting him.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.81 of 2011 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Salem. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 IPC. By judgment dated 08.11.2011, the trial Court convicted him under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused/appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows: ...
Kamala Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 16.02.2016 in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 16.02.2016 in accordance with law. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that on the complaint given by this petitioner, initially, a case in Crime No.59 of 2015 under Section 498(A) IPC was registered against this petitioner's husband. Thereafter, since the parties have arrived at a compromise, action was dropped in Crime No.59 of 2015 on 28.09.2015. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner's husband sweet-talked to her and promised her that he would mend his ways, based on which, the petitioner agreed for withdrawal of the complai...
Mohan Vs. State rep by the Inspector of Police, Karur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the cognizance taken by learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai in C.C.No. 64 of 2015 and direct the Respondent Police to file final report before the Special Court under TNPID Act by including the offence under TNPID Act by including the offence under TNPID Act.) 1. This petition has been filed to set aside the cognizance taken by learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai in C.C.No. 64 of 2015 and direct the Respondent Police to file final report before the Special Court under TNPID Act by including the offence under TNPID Act by including the offence under TNPID Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent, who would submit that after completion of the investigation, the charge sheet in C.C.No.64 of 2015 has been filed before learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai under Sections 420 and 506(i) IPC r/w 34 IPC an...
Chellammal Vs. V. Nainar Thevar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 08.02.2016 made in I.A.No.62 of 2016 in O.S.No.114 of 2006 on the file of learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi.) 1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order, dated 08.02.2016 made in I.A.No.62 of 2016 in O.S.No.114 of 2006, on the file of learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi. 2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff. The respondent is the defendant. 3. The revision petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.114 of 2006 for declaration and for both the permanent and mandatory injunction, to remove the encroachment in the II Schedule property, mentioned in the plaint. He has filed I.A.No.62 of 2016 to issue summons to the Surveyor to give evidence, with regard to pathway, which petitioner claims to be common pathway. According to the petitioner, it is a Government Poramboke ...
Sudalaipandian and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelve ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission to conduct Kabaddi Tournament, which is scheduled to be held on 26.03.2016 at 10.00 p.m. to 06.00 a.m. in Panaiyadipatti village Tenkasi Taluk Tirunelveli District based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2016.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondents to grant permission to conduct Kabaddi Tournament, which is scheduled to be held on 26.03.2016 at 10.00 p.m. to 06.00 a.m. in Panaiyadipatti village Tenkasi Taluk Tirunelveli District based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2016. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers jointly decided to conduct Kabadi Competition on 26.03.2016 at 10.00 p.m. to 06.00 a.m. in Panaiyadipatti village, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District. He would further submit that in this connection, a representation was given ...
Balaji Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to the Government ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records relating to the petitioner's detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 7.8.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein made in proceedings No.698/2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the said petitioner namely Balaji, son of Perumal aged 30 years before this Court and set the petitioner at liberty from detention now the petitioner detained at Central Prison II, Puzhal, Chennai.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. The petitioner, who is the detenu, namely, Balaji, son of Perumal, aged about 30 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 7.8.2015 against him branding him as a Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders...
Karuppayee and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Dist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register the case given by the petitioner dated 10.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register the case given by the petitioner dated 10.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 10.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 3rd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 10.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of....
J. Anthonyraj Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to file final report in Crime No.860 of 2015 within the time limit stipulated by this Court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondents to file final report in Crime No.860 of 2015 within the time limit stipulated by this Court. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent police to complete the investigation and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expeditiously as possible....
T. Rajaraman Vs. M.P. Nethaji and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair order and decreetal order dated 24.06.2010 made in C.M.A.No.19 of 2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee reversing the fair and decretal order dated 25.07.2007 made in I.A.No.2445 of 2003 in O.S.No.1074 of 1982 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Poonamallee.) 1. Though respondents No.1, 4 and 41 have chosen to enter appearance through counsel, the counsel for respondents No.4 and 41 are absent. The counsel for the 1st respondent alone is present. Respondents No.2, 3 and 5 to 40 were served with notice and their names have been printed in the cause list, still they have not chosen to enter appearance either in-person or through counsel. Notice to the respondents No.42 to 48 has been dispensed with by order dated 01.02.2016. 2. The arguments advanced by Mr.T.Murugamanickam, learned counsel for the petitioner and by Mr.S.T.Deiveegarajan for Mr.C.D.Sugumar, learned counsel ...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »