Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Alagarsamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the Petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to follow the dictum laid down by our Honourable Supreme Court in D.K.BASU case reported in 1997 (1) SCC 416.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the Petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to follow the dictum laid down by our Honourable Supreme Court in D.K.BASU case reported in 1997 (1) SCC 416. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on a complaint given by one Govindhan against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending before the 2nd respondent....
R.M. Ponnalagu Pattar and Another Vs. The Hindu Religious Charitable E ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to its order dated 18.11.2014 passed in A.P.No.23 of 2006 on appeal against the order of the 2nd respondent passed in Pro.Rc.No.7570 of 2003 B1 dated 02.01.2006 and to quash the same and further to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioners.) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 18.11.2014 in A.P.No.23 of 2006 passed by the 1st respondent, confirming the order dated 02.01.2006 in Pro.Rc.No.7570/2003 B1 passed by the 2nd respondent, removing the petitioners herein from the hereditary trusteeship of the temple viz., Arulmighu Jayamkonda Nayagi @ Poongundra Nayagi Amman Temple, Mahibalanpatti, Tirupattur Taluk, Sivagangai District. 2. The brief facts of the case which are necessary to dispose of this writ petition are as follows:- 2-1. The ...
The Saidapet Depressed Class Co-operative House Site Society Limited, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order Letter Na.Ka.No.2872/2013/E2, dated 24.09.2013 of the first respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to allot the surplus land to the extent of 2567 sq.meters, in Survey No.23/1 in T.S.No.23 part, Block No.12, situated in Kothawal Chavadi Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015 to the petitioner Society.) 1. The petitioner is the President of Saidapet Depressed Class Co-operative House Site Society Limited, registered on 16.06.1970, under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 and started functioning from 10.08.1970. The said Society consists of 64 members of whom 45 members are from Hindu Adi Dravida Community (Harijan Community) and the rest belongs to other depressed communities (such as 2 are Burma Refugees, 2 are Srilanka Refugees, 2 washer-men and 5 barbers). The petitioner'...
Veeramani and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records relating to the petitioner's detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order dated 31.7.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein made in proceedings B.C.D.F.G.I.S.S.S.V No.20 of 2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the said petitioner namely Veeramani, son of Selvam, aged 26 years, before this Court and set the petitioner at liberty from detention, now the petitioner detained at Central Prison II, Puzhal, Chennai 600 066.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. The petitioner, who is the detenu, Veeramani, son of Selvam, aged about 26 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 31.7.2015 against branding him as a Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug...
P. Maharajan and Another Vs. State Rep. by The Superintendent of Polic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to investigate and register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 16.02.2016 and to file a final report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to investigate and register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 16.02.2016 and to file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.67 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. G...
Faridha Banu Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the investigation in case in Crime No.28 of 2011 on the file of the District Crime Branch, Thanjavur District as investigated by the 2nd respondent to any other competent Investigating Officer.) 1. This petition has been filed to transfer the investigation in case in Crime No.28 of 2011 on the file of the District Crime Branch, Thanjavur District as investigated by the 2nd respondent to any other competent Investigating Officer. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the investigation in Crime No.28 of 2011 has been completed and a final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Thanjavur on 11.05.2015 and the same has not yet been taken on file. 4. Learned Magistrate is directed to look int...
Annadurai Vs. State rep by the Inspector of Police, Pudukkottai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Additional District Mahila Court, Pudukkottai to consider and pass orders on the same day on the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. in S.C.No.7 of 2014.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the learned Additional District Mahila Court, Pudukkottai to consider and pass orders on the same day on the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. in S.C.No.7 of 2014. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
P.S. Santhimeenal Vs. The Principal Government Arts College Thanthonim ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to furnish the petitioner's correct and sufficient information as per petitioner's letter dated 03.06.2013 and to pass such further or other orders.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Mandamus to direct the first respondent to furnish correct and sufficient information to the petitioner as per her letter dated 03.06.2013. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent and also the learned counsel appearing for the second and third respondents. 3. This is a fittest case where this Court has to observe that the benevolent enactment under the Right To Information Act has been misused and abused by the petitioner with vested interest. The petitioner has submitted an application dated 03.06.2013 to the first respondent seeking to furnish certain information about the third resp...
M. Kathiresan Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to remove the encroachment made in the cart track in S.No.539/32 Boothamangalam Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District based on the order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings Nee.Mu.No.6981/2011/C dated 15.09.2015.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Resident of Boothamangalam Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District, and owner of property in S.No.280/8A1 measuring 35 cents of Nanja land, has sought for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent/ Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District, to remove the alleged encroachment made on a cart track in S.No.539/32 Boothamangalam Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District, based on the order passed by the 1st respondent/District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, in his proceedings Nee.Mu.No.6981/2011/C dated 15.09.2015. 2. According to the petitioner, Melur-Singampunari main road is adjacent to his property. The...
M/s. Eveready Industries India Ld., Chennai Vs. The Customs, Excise an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 19.9.2007 made in final order No.1173/07 on the file of the first respondent herein.) Common Judgment: V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, reversing the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restoring the order of the Original Authority. 2. Heard Mr.Raghavan Ramabadran, learned counsel for the appellant/ assessee and Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3. 3. On 19.3.2008, the above appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law : "Whether the first respondent is right in holding that as per para No.95 of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Mafatlal Industries Ltd. Vs. UOI [1997 (89) ELT 247 (SC)] if the provisional assessment finalisation orders passed under Rule 9B(5) of the Centra...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »