Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Correspondent, Schafter Higher Secondary School, Tirunelveli Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P(MD)No.12231 of 2014 dated 28.09.2015.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal, is to an order, made in W.P(MD)No.12231 of 2014, dated 28.09.2015. The said Writ Petition has been filed, by the 1st respondent herein/writ petitioner therein, for a Mandamus, directing the respondents, to pay him the arrears of salary, in the post of Office Assistant, in Schafter Higher Secondary School, Tirunelveli/4th respondent therein, with effect from 03.06.2009, by passing appropriate orders, on the representation, submitted by the writ petitioner, dated 07.06.2014, with consequential attendant benefits, with interest, within a time frame, to be fixed by this Court. 2. Facts deduced from the material on record are that the appellant/Schafter Higher Secondary School, Tirunelveli, is a minority school. Vide proceedings, dated 07.02.2006, the 1st respondent herein, was appointed as Office Assistant, in the appell...
S. Tamilarasan and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the impugned order in BDFGISSV No.731/2015 dated 13.8.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and direct to the respondents to produce the detenu Marudhupandi, son of Tamilarasan, aged about 22 years now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Court and set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the father of the detenu, namely, Marudhupandi, aged 22 years, son of Tamilarasan, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in BDFGISSV No.731/2015 dated 13.8.2015, passed by the 2nd respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum...
Rafeek and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.1.2016 forwarded by the 1st respondent and to investigate and to file a final report within a stipulated time.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.1.2016 forwarded by the 1st respondent, to investigate and to file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 29.01.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 29.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and ...
Veeramuthu Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District and An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the case on the basis of petitioner's complaint dated 31.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the case on the basis of petitioner's complaint dated 31.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P and others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of...
P. Subramanian and Another Vs. State rep by the Inspector of Police, T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order dated 08.12.2015 passed in C.M.P.No.2920 of 2010 in C.C.No.4 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Lalgudi by allowing the present Criminal Original Petition.) 1. This petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 08.12.2015 passed in C.M.P.No.2920 of 2010 in C.C.No.4 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Lalgudi by allowing the present Criminal Original Petition. 2. It is seen that the petitioners are facing trial in C.C.No.4 of 2002 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi for offences under Sections 408, 418 and 477A r/w 34 IPC. The trial commenced in the year 2002 and the prosecution evidence was closed by the learned Magistrate on 04.05.2012. Statements of the accused were recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and the argument on either side...
The Correspondent, Holy Cross Primary School Vs. The Central Board of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the second respondent in Letter C.No.Misc/PRO/2015-16 dated 07.10.2015 and the consequent circular of the 4th respondent Director of Treasuries and Accounts in RC.No.23545/2014/E1 dated 26.10.2015 insisting upon the petitioner to deduct Income Tax (TDS) from the salaries of the Religious Nuns in the service of the petitioner's school (name list annexed), quash the same, in so far as the petitioner's school is concerned.) Common Order: 1. These Writ Petitions have been filed praying to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the second respondent in Letter C.No.Misc/PRO/2015-16, dated 07.10.2015 and the consequent circular of the 4th respondent Director of Treasuries and Accounts in RC.No.23545/2014/E1 dated 26.10.2015 insisting upon the petitioner to deduct Income Tax (TDS) from the salar...
Vijayaragavan Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Police (Crime), Madurai a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register the case upon the petitioner's complaint dated 09.02.2016 and investigate the same.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register the case upon the petitioner's complaint dated 09.02.2016 and investigate the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 09.02.2016, it is essentially a business dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party and therefore, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Gangadaran and Another Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Attur Pol ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence made in S.C.No.220 of 2005 dated 12.10.2010 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Salem.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 and 2 in S.C.No.220 of 2005 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Salem. There was yet another accused, namely, Mubarak Ali, who was arrayed as the third accused. The appellants/accused 1 and 2 stood charged for an offence under Section 302 of IPC whereas the 3rd accused stood charged for an offence under Section 302 read with 34 of IPC. Further, the first accused stood charged for an offence under Section 380 of IPC whereas the accused 2 and 3 stood charged for an offence under Section 380 read with 34 of IPC. By judgment dated 12.10.2010, the trial court convicted the accused 1 and 2 for the offence under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced the accused 1 and 2/appellants 1 and 2 to undergo impr...
K. Murugan Vs. K. Mariappan and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayers in S.A.(MD)No.358 of 2015: The Second Appeals filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 27.04.2015 made in A.S.No.16 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Theni in reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 18.02.2014 passed in O.S.No.120 of 2011 on the file of Sub Court, Theni.) Common Judgment 1. Both the second appeals arising out of Common Judgment made in A.S.Nos.16 of 2014 and 17 of 2014 made by the Principal District Judge, Theni. In both the appeals the appellant is same and the disputes involved in this case are one and the same, hence these two appeals are disposed by the Common Judgment. 2. In both the appeals the first defendant in the suit is the appellant herein and the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.120 of 2011 is the first respondent in the S.A.(MD)No.358 of 2015. The plaintiff in the O.S.No.148 of 2012 is the first respondent in the S.A.(MD) No.359 of 2015. The suit in O.S.No.120 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate J...
K. Rajalakshmi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the complaint dated 12.01.2016 given by the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the complaint dated 12.01.2016 given by the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 12.01.2016, it is seen that the opposite party has borrowed Rs.36,000/- from the petitioner and in order to give criminal colour to it, the petitioner has stated that she was intimidated by the opposite party and therefore, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »