Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Vanaja Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent police to register a FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 31.1.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to register an FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 31.1.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 31.01.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 12.02.2016. A copy of the closure report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 3. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
K. Prithviraj Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to instruct the 3rd respondent to register a case on the basis of his complaint dated 18.2.2016 on the file of the respondents.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to instruct the 3rd respondent to register a case on the basis of his complaint dated 18.2.2016 on the file of the respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint, it appears that the dispute essentially appears to be civil in nature. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR on the complaint dated 18.02.2016, given by the petitioner. Therefore, this Criminal Original petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Ponnusamy and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioners from the respondents 3 to 9 herein, their men or anybody claiming under them by considering and passing appropriate orders on the petitioner's complaint dated. 27.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioners from the respondents 3 to 9 herein, their men or anybody claiming under them by considering and passing appropriate orders on the petitioner's complaint dated. 27.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint given by the 2nd petitioner, a petition enquiry has been conducted in CSR No.14 of 2016 and the same was closed on 03.03.2016. 3. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to...
Paramasivam Vs. State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, Coimbatore
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal as against the judgment dated 07.02.2013 made in S.C. No. 217 of 2011 by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Coimbatore.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C. No. 217 of 2011 on the file of IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Coimbatore. He stood charged for the offences under Sections 364 and 302 I.P.C. By judgment dated 07.02.2013, the Trial Court convicted the appellant under both the charges and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 months for the offence under Section 364 I.P.C. and to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. However, no default sentence was imposed for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appea...
Aarifa Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to the Government ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records relating to the petitioner's husband detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order dated 4.9.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein made in proceedings No.868/BCDFGISSSV/2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the said petitioner's husband namely Raja @ Raja Mohamed son of Khader Basha, aged 34 years, before this Court and set the petitioner's husband at liberty from detention, now the petitioner's husband detained at Central Prison II, Puzhal, Chennai.) M. Jaichandren, J.] 1. The petitioner, who is the wife of the detenu, Raja @ Raja Mohamed, son of Khader Basha, aged about 34 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 4.9.2015 against her husband branding him as a Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Preve...
Valarmathi and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case/FIR on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 15.02.2016 and investigate the same.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case/FIR on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 15.02.2016 and investigate the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 15.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.8 of 2016 dated 03.03.2016 for offences under Sections 406, 419 and 420 IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Pitchai Iyer and Another Vs. Arulmighu Sakthivaneswara Swami Temple an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2015 made in A.S.No.16 of 2014 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2013 made in O.S.No.114 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.) 1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2015 made in A.S.No.16 of 2014 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2013 made in O.S.No.114 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 2. The facts arising out of this case, are as under: The appellants herein are the plaintiffs and the respondents herein are the defendants in the suit filed in O.S.No.114 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam. The plaintiffs have filed the...
City Generator Co., Represented by its Proprietor A.P.Arunachalam Vs. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer in W.P(MD)No.5069 of 2016:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in Appeal No. and Year 01/2013 dated 04.05.2015 and remand back the same and consequently to direct the first respondent to re-consider the appeal afresh after providing the copies of the alleged written argument and additional argument said to be filed and after giving adequate opportunity to the petitioner and by properly considering the contentions raised by the petitioner in the appeal and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Common Order 1. The only ground raised by the petitioner is that the order passed by the authority is only based on the written argument given by the department side and additional written statement. According to the petitioner, neither the copy of the written arguments nor the copy of th...
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. M. Rajammal and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 22.01.2010 in MCOP.No.82 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the award, made in MCOP.No.82 of 2007, dated 22.01.2010, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi, the present appeal has been filed. 2. That on 01.04.2007, about 11.45 P.M., son of the respondents 1 and 2/claimants and husband of the 5th respondent, namely, Kannan, was riding a Bajaj Motor Cycle bearing registration No.TN-76-A-3610. While he was crossing Tenkasi-Tirunelveli main road under Elephant Bridge, a Mini Lorry bearing registration No.TN 69 X 2624, belonging to the 4th respondent herein, insured with the appellant insurance company, driven by its driver/3rd respondent from north to south, in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the motor cyclist. He sustained injuries. Immediately, h...
Alpha Helical Pumps Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore Vs. The Federal Bank Limited ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing Federal Bank Limited, Coimbatore Branch, the first respondent to forthwith resume operational status of the petitioner's Account ODCC No.10925500007063.) The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for issuance of a Mandamus to direct the first respondent to forthwith permit the petitioner to operate the bank account bearing ODCC No.10925500007063 with them. 2. The brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this writ petition are as follows:- (i) The petitioner is a small scale industry which is having it's factory at Coimbatore where 40 employees are working. The petitioner company is engaged in manufacture of helical pumpset which are meant to handle hazardous materials such as industrial wastes, abrasives, acids etc., During the course of such business, the petitioner opened a bank account with the first respondent and it was earlier operated by th...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »