Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D. John Ranjith Kumar Vs. The District Collector, Thanjavur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order bearing Na.Ka.No.4068/2008 dated 23.11.2012 passed by the second respondent and the consequential order bearing Na.Ka.No.4068/2008/chat.A dated 20.03.2013 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to refix the rent on the basis of the handed over area of 11,653 Sq.ft to the petitioner and direct the respondents to return the excess amount paid by the petitioner along with the deposit made by the petitioner and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) The prayer in this Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order bearing Na.Ka.No.4068/2008 dated 23.11.2012 passed by the second respondent and the consequential order bearing Na.Ka.No.4068/2008/chat.A dated 20.03.2013...
M/s. National Insurance Company Limited., Tiruchy Vs. C. Rajammal and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 11.04.2005 in MCOP.No.2715 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III Additional Sub Court, Tiruchirappalli.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal by M/s.National Insurance Company Limited., Cantonment, Tiruchy, is to the quantum of compensation of Rs.18,27,000/-, with interest, @ 9% per annum, awarded to the legal representatives of the deceased. As the challenge is limited, there is no need to advert to the finding of the Tribunal, fixing negligence on the driver of the offending vehicle, insured with the appellant company and the consequential liability. 2. According to the wife, minor children aged 10 and 4 years respectively, at the time of filing of the claim petition and parents, in the accident which occurred on 09.07.2002, their breadwinner Chelladurai died. At the time of accident, he was working as a Mechanist Grade-II in IPP / Workshop (...
S. Swaminathan Vs. S. Dhanushkodi and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order regarding marking of two unprobated registered wills dated 01.03.2016 made in O.S.No.3643 of 2015 on the file of the 15th Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai.) 1. The plaintiff in the original suit O.S.No.3643 of 2015 pending on the file of XV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai is the petitioner in the present revision preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The matter stands listed today for admission. 2. The arguments advanced by Mr.S.Rajesh, learned counsel for the petitioner are heard. Certified copy of the impugned order of the learned trial Judge dated 01.03.2016 and copies of the other documents produced in the form of typed-set of papers are also perused. 3. The above said suit came to be filed for a declaration that a registered partition deed dated 09.06.1998 bearing Document No.1441 of 1998 in the Register of the Sub-Registrar, Royapuram, Chennai ...
Thiruchendur Murugan and Others Vs. State Rep. by, The Deputy Superint ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.76 of 2012 dated 19.12.2012 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.76 of 2012 dated 19.12.2012 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent police. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent police before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to complete the investigation in Crime No.76 of 2012 and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order....
N. Prasanth Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable T.V Corp ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant LCO number to the petitioner, who is having Cable Television Registration No.896 dated 03.02.2016 issued by the Head Post Master, Bodinayakkanur and running Cable Television Network at K.N.Cable T.V, Ward No.4, Door No.3, Kottai Karuppasamy Kovil Street, Gudalur, Theni District, and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petitionis for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to grant LCO number to the petitioner, who is having Cable Television Registration No.896 dated 03.02.2016 issued by the Head Post Master, Bodinayakkanur and running Cable Television Network at K.N.Cable T.V, Ward No.4, Door No.3, Kottai Karuppasamy Kovil Street, Gudalur, Theni District. 2. Mr.A.Abdul Saleem, represented by Mr.S.Satheesh Kumar learned Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. By ...
B. Kutralingam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to produce the body of petitioner's daughter Ramalakshmi, D/o.Kutralingam, Female, aged about 21 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The petitioner is the father of the detenue, viz.,Ramalakshmi, aged about 21 years. According to the petitioner, the detenue has been found missing from 18.02.2016. On a complaint made by the petitioner to the police, a case was registered in Crime No.218 of 2016 for Women Missing on 27.02.2016 and the same is under investigation. Since, the girl has not been secured, the petitioner has filed this Habeas Corpus Petition directing the respondents 1 to 3 to produce the body of petitioner's daughter Ramalakshmi, aged about 21 years, before this Court and to set her at liberty. 2. Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instruction fr...
M.S. Hygiene Jose Vs. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generati ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the Impugned order passed by the 2rd respondent in his proceedings Ka.No.Ei.Ni.Po/Vini/Para/Ko.Kattu/A.No.658/16 dated 10.02.16 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to provide the electricity connection to the petitioner s house in Re-Survey No.915/2 of Eraniel Village having an extent of 15 cents and building bearing No.27/62C of Nulivilai Panchayat,Kalkulam Taluk Kanyakumari District on executing the indemnity bond under Clause 27(4) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code 2004 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petitionis for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the Impugned order passed by the 2rd respondent in his proceedings Ka.No.Ei.Ni.Po/Vini/Para/Ko.Kattu/A.No.658/16 dated 10.02.1...
V. Kalyan Vs. The Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Co ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from erecting any high voltage electric towers in the properties of the petitioner's in Survey No.33/2B, 33/4, 10, 11, 12, 27/7 and 26/7 of Muthulapuram Village in Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District or drawing high voltage electric line over them without following the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885 and pass such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The only point which has been raised by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the electricity tower and the line were sought to be erected in the petitioner's land and a portion of the land will get affected due to the same. Hence, the petitioner made an objection on 14.03.2016, but the same was not considered by the respondents so far. 2. She further submits that as per the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in 2010-3 L....
B. Yogeswaran @ Yuvaraj Vs. Y. Kanchana
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revisions against the order dated 25.09.2012 made in M.C.No.441 of 2004 on the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai.) Common Order: 1. The wife and husband are embroiled in a close contest in a maintenance case in M.C.No.441 of 2004. 2. The wife asked for Rs.5,000/- as monthly maintenance under Section 125(1) Cr.P.C. The husband opposed it. Ultimately, the wife won partially as she was granted Rs.3,000/- per month from the date of filing of the maintenance petition. 3. Aggrieved, the husband filed Crl.R.C.No.433 of 2013 as against grant of maintenance to his wife. While the wife filed Crl.R.C.No.269 of 2016 as against not granting her Rs.5,000/- as prayed for. 4. In this regard, the learned counsels have presented their point of view. Now we have to give our (Court's) point of view in consideration of their arguments, impugned order and the materials on record. 5. The crux of the matter is whether the husband, in spite of having his means, failed and negle...
Sajith and Others Vs. State rep by the Inspector of Police, Kanyakumar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No.132 of 2014 on the file of the 1st respondent and to quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the case registered in Crime No.132 of 2014 on the file of the 1st respondent police, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.132 of 2014 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 427 and 506(i) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners/A1 to A3. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/A1 to A3 and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify of their respective part...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »