Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A/m. Vadapalani Andavar Temple Devasthanam Rep. by its Dy. Commissione ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC against the judgment and decree of the learned VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai dated 10.12.2011 made in O.S.No.11346 of 2010.) 1. The first defendant in the original suit O.S.No.11346/2010 on the file of the VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai has brought-forth this appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the decree of the trial court dated 10.12.2011 made in the said suit. The first respondent herein filed the said suit for a declaration of absolute title of the first respondent herein/plaintiff in respect of the suit property and for a consequential injunction against the appellant herein and the respondents 2 and 3 herein, not to cause any interference or obstruction to the first respondent/plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The learned trial judge, after trial, held the first respondent herein/pla...
The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P(MD)No.8848 of 2009 dated 28.03.2011.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul, represented by its General Manager, has preferred the instant appeal, challenging the order, made in W.P(MD)No.8848 of 2009, dated 28.03.2011, by which, the Writ Court has held that the 1st respondent/V.Sivakumar, is entitled to pension from August 2003. The Writ Court has directed the appellant corporation to continue to pay pension, and further directed that arrears of pension from August 2003 be paid, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order made in the writ petition. Writ Court has further directed that pension be continuously paid to the 1st respondent from April 2011. 2. Short facts leading to the appeal, are that the 1st respondent was appointed as a Conductor in transport corporation on 06.08.1980. His services were regu...
Adakkappan Poosari Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.11.2015 within a time frame fixed by this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. On 14.03.2016, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted on 18.03.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs....
T. Jothiraj Vs. T. Ashokkumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order passed by the learned Mahalir NeethiMandram, Fast Track Mahila Court, Karur in Crl.M.P.No.32 of 2016 in C.A.No.8 of 2015 dated 25.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filedto set aside the order passed by the learned Mahalir NeethiMandram, Fast Track Mahila Court, Karur in Crl.M.P.No.32 of 2016 in C.A.No.8 of 2015 dated 25.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. It is seen that this petitioner was convicted and sentenced in C.C.No.463 of 2013, challenging which, he filed an appeal in C.A.No.8 of 2015. During the pendency of appeal, the petitioner/accused filed an application in Crl.M.P.No.32 of 2016 under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for recalling Thiagarajan, who was examined as P.W.2 in the Trial Court, on the ground that he has to be confronted with the Power of Attorney dated 10.04.2013, in which the said Thiagarajan has signed as witness. 4. It is also seen that Thiaga...
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Santhana Mariammal and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
S. Manikumar, J. Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation of Rs.22,70,000/- with interest @6% per annum, awarded to the legal representatives of the deceased, M/s.National Insurance Company Limited., Theni District, is on appeal. As the challenge is limited, there is no need to advert to the finding of the Tribunal, fixing negligence on the driver of the offending vehicle, insured with the appellant company and the consequential liability. 2. Material on record discloses that in the accident which occurred on 26.02.2012, husband of the 1st respondent, an Advocate aged 40 years, died. He is survived by his wife, minor son, mother, sister and brother. They made a claim in MCOP. No.60 of 2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Judge, Periyakulam, for compensation of Rs.25,00,000/-. According to them, at the time of accident, he was aged about 40 years and as an Advocate, earned Rs.20,000/- per month. The appellant opposed the quantum on the grounds that in the a...
S.C. Nagabushanam Vs. M/s. Sujana Metal Products Ltd. Rep. by its Mana ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court No.II) Egmore, Chennai-8, made in C.M.P.No.51/2015 in C.C.No.4159/2012 dated 06.01.2016.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition challenging the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court No.II) Egmore, Chennai-8, made in C.M.P.No.51/2015 in C.C.No.4159/2012 dated 06.01.2016. 2. The respondent as a complainant filed a private complaint against the petitioner for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act stating that the petitioner herein has approached him for the supply of TMT bars and promised to pay the sale consideration raised under invoices promptly within 30 days from the date of delivery. Accordingly, the respondent has supplied the TMT bars to the tune of Rs.4,22,855/- vide invoice dated 31.03.2010. Since the respondent made repeated demands, th...
Vasantha Kumari and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to expedite the investigation and file the final report in Crime No.321 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to expedite the investigation and file the final report in Crime No.321 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that charge sheet has already been filed in this case in Crime No.321 of 2015 on 06.11.2015 itself before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.3, Nagercoil. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
M/s. Standard Match Industries Pvt Ltd. Vs. The Assistant Executive En ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned letter No.AEEE/D/TTC/F.HTSC.Inspector/D.No.201 dated 14.03.2016 issued by the respondent and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in this Writ Petitionis for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned letter No.AEEE/D/TTC/F.HTSC.Inspector/D.No.201 dated 14.03.2016 issued by the respondent and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper. 2. Mr.G.Kasinathadurai, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondent. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The impugned order is only a provisional assessment. It only implies that final order has not been passed. In fact, they have also given time to the petitioner to appear and give explanation. Without giving explan...
K. Sathyabal and Others Vs. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Petitions under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Declaration to declare that the order in R.O.C.No.3587/15 dated 26.11.2015 passed by the 2nd respondent in the name of the 1st respondent read with the order dated 22.11.2015 issued by the 4th respondent as communicated by the 3rd respondent vide Letter No.BCI:D:5383/2015 (Council) dated 23.11.2015 as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the order dated 31.12.2015 passed by the 4th respondent as communicated by the 3rd respondent Letter No.BCI/D/6011/2015 read with letter CONFDL.No.2436 of 2015 dated 02.01.2016 dated 31.12.2015 and the other proceedings thereon.) Common Order: V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. The petitioners have come up with the above writ petitions challenging (i) an order issued by the Chairman of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, prohibiting them from practising as Advocates in any Court until the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings and also (ii) t...
Ganapathy Velalar Vs. Thiruvaleeswaran (died) and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: CRP(MD).Nos.2656 to 2659 of 2015 : The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.07.2015 passed in I.A.No.2166 of 2013 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 and I.A.Nos. 96 to 98 of 2015 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi.CRP(MD).Nos.2124 of 2015: The Civil Revision Petition is filed to call for the records and set aside the fair and executable order dated 10.07.2015 passed in execution petition in E.P.No.3 of 2013 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi.) 1. The Civil Revision Petitions in C.R.P(MD).Nos.2656 to 2659 of 2015 are filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.07.2015 passed in I.A.No.2166 of 2013 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 and I.A.Nos. 96 to 98 of 2015 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi. 2. The Civil Revision Petition in CRP(MD).No.2124 of 2015 is filed to call for the records and set aside the fair and executable orde...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »