Chennai Court February 2016 Judgments
S. Ganamani and Others Vs. D. Ramanathan and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to reject the Execution Proceedings in E.P.R.No.143 of 2014 in O.S.No.344 of 1991 on the file of Subordinate Judge of Pollachi, till the disposal of appeal in A.S.No.211 of 1997 on the file of First Additional District Judge, Coimbatore.) 1. The legal heirs of the deceased second defendant are the revision petitioners. 2. Originally suit has been filed in O.S.No.344 of 1991 by the plaintiffs 1 and 2, against the defendants 1 to 8 seeking the relief for specific performance. On 29.02.1996, the suit was decreed directing the defendants 2 to 8 to receive the balance sale consideration and also to execute the sale deed. Challenging the same, the defendants 2,3 and 4 have filed an appeal in A.S.No.211 of 1997 on the file of II Additional District Court, Coimbatore. 2.1. Pending appeal, the second defendant died on 27.01.2013. The legal representatives of the deceased second defendant has filed an appl...
Tag this Judgment!A. Senthil Vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to accept the petitioner as an Advocate for enrollment of Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry on the basis of the petitioner's application dated 18.10.2013 submitted before the respondent.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. The petitioner, who has completed his B.L., Graduation in 2013 could not enroll, as an Advocate, on account of two criminal cases have been registered against him in Crime No.163 of 2010 and Crime No.23 of 2013 respectively on the file of the Inspector of Police, Veeravanallur Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 2. Material on record discloses that in Crime No.163 of 2010, on the file of Inspector of Police, Veeravanallur Police Station, Tirunelveli District, after investigation, charge sheet has been filed, which was taken on file C.C.No.293 of 2010, on the file of learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi....
Tag this Judgment!K.M. Balasubramaniyam and Another Vs. Director of Town and Country Pla ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the 3rd Respondent dated 27.10.2015 in Proceedings Na.Ka.No.2353/2007/F1 and quash the same.) Common Order: 1. The Petitioners have preferred the present Writ Petitions praying for passing of an Order by this Court in calling for the records pertaining to the Order of the 3rd Respondent/ Member Secretary / Commissioner(Inc), Local Planning Authority, Gobichettipalayam Municipality, Gobichettipalayam dated 27.10.2015 in Proceedings No. Na.Ka.2353/2007/F1 and to quash the same. 2. According to the Petitioners, the 2nd Petitioner purchased an extent of 3344 Sq.Ft., of lands in Perumal Koil Street, Gobichettiyapalayam as per Sale Deed Dated 19.08.1989 from one Rajakotti and Harikrishnan by means of a registered Document No.774/1989 Book-I, Vol. 116, on the file of the District Registrar, Gobichettipalayam. The stand of the Petitioners ...
Tag this Judgment!R. Rajaram and Others Vs. The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urb ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenging the order dated 28.02.2014 passed in W.P. No.6039 of 2014.) Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The instant appeal arises from the order dated 28 February 2014 passed in W.P. No.6039 of 2014. 2. To avoid prolixity, the parties are referred to as per their rank in the instant appeal. 3. The appellants preferred the instant writ petition being W.P.No.6039 of 2014, calling in question, the legality and validity of G.O. Ms.No.879, Housing and Urban Development Department dated 28 May 1991 published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on 19 June 1991 with regard to the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Old Act, 1894 ) and also G.O. Ms. No.447, Housing and Urban Development Department dated 20 July 1992 published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary on 21 July 1992 with regard to the declaration under Section 6 of the Old Act, 1894 issued by the...
Tag this Judgment!K. Durairaj @ Venkidasamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to protect his life and liberty and for surveying the land to an extent of 1 acre 60 cents situated in Survey No.137 Vadakarai Village periyakulam Taluk Theni District.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to protect his life and liberty and for surveying the land to an extent of 1 acre 60 cents situated in Survey No.137 Vadakarai Village periyakulam Taluk Theni District. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the petition, it is clear that there is a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4 with regard to the enjoyment of the property in question. Under such circumstances, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent pol...
Tag this Judgment!Duraithangaraju Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Thanjavur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on a complaint given by one Arunachalam against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.52 of 2016 before the 3rd respondent. 4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. With the above direction, this petition is ...
Tag this Judgment!Indu Sethia Vs. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to follow the due process of law to claim any amount apart from consumption charges in respect of LT Service Connection No. 281/031/3 bearing consumer No. 092810313 for the Door No.48 (Old No.37), Varadharajapuram Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Chennai 600 056.) 1. Heard Mr.R.Murali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.K.Raameshuwar, learned Standing Counsel, accepting notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. By consent of the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to follow the due process of law to claim any amount payable in respect LT Service Connection No. 281/031/3 bearing consumer No. 092810313 for the Door No.48 (Old No.37), Varadharajapuram Village, Poonama...
Tag this Judgment!S. Selvam Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the illegal Gravel quarrying operations of the 6th respondent made in the petitioner's village i.e Vembangkudi Village, situating in Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.02.2016 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble High Court.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. ''A permanent resident of Vembangkudi Village, Keelakandani Post, Sivagangai District and claiming to be a Public Interest Litigant, has filed the present Writ Petition, for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the District Collector, Sivagangai District, 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the 6th respondent, alleging illegal Gravel quarrying in Vembangkudi Village, situating in Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District based on his representation dated 01.02.2016. 2. Supporting the relief sought...
Tag this Judgment!Arayee @ Lakshmi and Another Vs. M. Indira and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and decretal order dated 29.10.2015 in I.A.No.342 of 2015 in O.S.No.165 of 2014 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem.) 1. The matter stands listed today for admission. This court is of the view that the civil revision petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself even without notice to the other side. Accordingly, the arguments advanced by Mr.T.Karunakaran, learned counsel for the petitioners are heard. The grounds of revision, copy of the impugned order and copies of the other documents produced by the petitioners in the form of typed sets of papers are also perused and taken into consideration. 2. The petitioners in the present civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are the defendants 3 and 4 in the original suit O.S.No.165/2014 pending on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem. The said suit was filed b...
Tag this Judgment!A. Raja Hussain Vs. The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk Office, Virudhuna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to measure and demarcate the property in Survey No.181/7A in Patta No.617 in V.Nangoor Village, Virudhunagar District as per petitioner application dated 02.11.2015.) 1. The petitioner seeks for measuring and demarcating the property of his land, by considering his application dated 02.11.2015. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though he made an application on 02.11.2015, till date, his request has not been considered by the respondents, which resulted in the filing of the present Writ Petition. 3. In view of the above, without expressing any view on the claim of the petitioner, the respondents are directed to consider the request of the petitioner seeking for measuring and demarcating the property of his land by considering his application dated 02.11.2015, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »