Chennai Court February 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T. Meenakshi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 9.2.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 9.2.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 09.02.2016 has been sent by post to the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 09.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if ...
Diraviam and Others Vs. State through The Sub-Inspector of Police, Din ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in P.R.C.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nathem and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed to quash the P.R.C.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nathem. 2. As this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nathem, on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties in view of the serious allegations levelled against these petitioners/ accused, learned counsel for the petitioners/accused seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. Permission is granted. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Indubai and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2013 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (VI Court of Small Causes, Chennai), in M.C.O.P.No.3886 of 2012.) S. Vaidyanathan, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2/claimants. 2. Challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (VI Court of Small Causes), Chennai, by its judgment dated 25.09.2013 in M.C.O.P.No.3886 of 2012, the Insurance Company has come up with the present appeal. 3. This is a case of fatal accident of a 21 year old M.B.B.S. student, by name, T.Madhan Kumar. On 15.05.2002, about 6.00 p.m., when the deceased was driving a Maruthi Car bearing Registration No.TN-05-B-1234 from south to north direction by the western edge of 200 feet road, Mettukuppam, a Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-49-X-0180, came ...
C. Bhakyalakshmi and Others Vs. The Secretary to the Government Home P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 17.8.2015 in memo No.755/BCDFGISSSV/2015 against the petitioner's husband Chandru @ Chandrasekar, son of Shankar, aged about 37 years, who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the wife of the detenu, namely, Chandru @ Chandrasekar, aged 37 years, son of Shankar, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in memo No.755/BCDFGISSSV/2015, dated 17.8.2015, passed by the 2nd respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic...
Maheswaran Vs. State rep. by Inspector of Police, Ukkadam Police Stati ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal against the judgment dated 30.10.2008 passed in S.C. No. 133 of 2007 on the file of Additional District and Sessions Court, FTC No.II, Coimbatore.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C. No. 133 of 2007 on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Coimbatore. He stood charged for the offence under Section 398 and 302 I.P.C. By judgment dated 30.10.2008, the Trial Court convicted him under both the charges and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three years for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 398 I.P.C. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follo...
R. Prakashkumar and Others Vs. The Deputy Superintedent of Police, Sam ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Madurai to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider the bail applications of the petitioners on the same day on merits in connection with Crime No. 80 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Madurai to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider the bail applications of the petitioners on the same day on merits in connection with Crime No. 80 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 294B, 323, 448, 354 IPC r/w 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act in Crime No.80 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said...
Petchiammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register FIR against the proposed accused on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 29.1.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register FIR against the proposed accused on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 29.1.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 29.01.2016 has been sent by post to the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 29.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop ac...
A. Arul Mozhi Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent herein to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's fresh complaint dated 13.02.2016 and proceed with investigation in accordance with law and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent herein to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's fresh complaint dated 13.02.2016 and proceed with investigation in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 13.02.2016, it is seen that this petitioner and the opposite party are having disputes in connection with a path way and a suit in O.S.No.516 of 2015 is pending. While so, it is alleged by the petitioner that on 11.01.2016, when she came to take photographs, the opposite party had threatened the petitioner on dire consequences. 4. A reading of the complaint do...
Nagaraj and Others Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu rep by its Principal S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records in C.No.34/G/IS/2015 dated 6.8.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to produce the body of the petitioner's son N.Vignesh, aged 25 years, now confined in Central Prison, Coimbatore, before this Court and set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. The petitioner, who is the father of the detenu, N.Vignesh, son of Nagaraj, aged about 25 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 6.8.2015 against his son branding him as a Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982]. 2. The learned Additional Public P...
S. Pushpalatha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband for their life and limb considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband for their life and limb considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.02.2016. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that this petitioner fell in love with one Ramachandra Prabhu, who belongs to a different community and got married on 31.01.2016 at Sri Ayyanar Temple, Vedasandur and it is alleged that the petitioner's uncle / 3rd respondent herein is causing disturbance to their life. 4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh vs State of U.P. and Another, reported...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »