Chennai Court February 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Singam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 01.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law and also file the final report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 01.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law and also file the final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shal...
T. Chidambaram Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 12.02.2016, it is seen that there is a dispute between the petitioner and his family members inasmuch as it is alleged by the petitioner that a document was executed illegally on 05.09.1996. Since the matter essentially appears to be civil in nature, this Court is of the view that no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the mann...
Mani and Another Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, L and O
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal as against the judgment dated 08.02.2012 passed in S.C. No. 14 of 2010 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge II, Kancheepuram.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in S.C. No. 14 of 2010 on the file of learned Principal Sessions Judge-II, Kancheepuram. The third accused was one Chalendran @ Madan. They stood charged for the offences under Sections 341 I.P.C., 302 r/w 34 I.P.C. and 404 r/w 34 I.P.C. By judgment dated 08.02.2012, while acquitting the third accused of all the charges, the Trial Court convicted these two appellants under all the three charges and sentenced each one of them to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 341 I.P.C., to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 302 r/w 34 I.P.C. and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default ...
P. Jeyaraman Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 22.12.2015 made before the 1st respondent.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 22.12.2015 made before the 1st respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 22.12.2015, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law....
P. Kethcial Annamariyal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 15.07.2015.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 15.07.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 15.07.2015, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. 3. Recording the same, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. The respondent police is directed to serve a copy of the Closure Report on the petitioner within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order....
M. Chinnasamy and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent No.2 to register FIR on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 13.1.2016 and take necessary action in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent No.2 to register FIR on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 13.1.2016 and take necessary action in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 13.01.2016 has been sent by post to the 2nd respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 13.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance w...
M/s. Saheli Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. GAIL (India) Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to grant order order of interim injunction restraining the respondent from issuing/raising any supplementary invoice/debit notes on the applicant based on the take or pay clause in the GSTA for the duration when the applicant was unable to lift gas on account of the applicant having to shut down its plant or reduce generation at its plant on account of the instructions issued by the SLDC to the applicant to reduce/stop generation of power at the applicant's power plant pending the arbitration proceedings.) This application is filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, seeking for an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent from issuing/raising any supplementary invoice/debit notes on the applicant based on the take or pay clause in the GSTA for the duration when the applicant was unable to lift gas on ac...
Rajasekar and Another Vs. State rep. by Inspector of Police, Cuddalore
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Common Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment and conviction passed in S.C.No.351 of 2010 on 31.03.2011 by the learned Additional District Judge, F.T.C., II Cuddalore District.) Common Judgment: S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 and 2 in S.C.No.351 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, (F.T.C.No.2), Cuddalore. The first accused stood charged for offence under Section 302 I.P.C., and the second accused stood charged for offence under Section 302 r/w 109 I.P.C. By judgment dated 31.03.2011, the trial Court convicted the first accused for offence under Section 302 I.P.C., and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and convicted the second accused for offence under Section 302 r/w 109 I.P.C., and sentenced her to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo rigor...
M/s. Pandi Devi Oil Private Limited, by its Director, Pondicherry Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: WP.No.40900 of 2015 is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st Respondent in TIN 34620013993/ 74/2014-2015, dated 13.5.2015 addressed to the 2nd Respondent and to quash the same and to direct the 1st Respondent to rectify the assessment order dated 20.2.2015, passed for the assessment year CST 34620013993/2011-2012, based on the rectification application, dated 23.3.2015 of the Petitioner. WP.No.40901 of 2015 is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st Respondent in TIN 34620013993/ 74/2014-2015, dated 13.5.2015 addressed to the 2nd Respondent and to quash the same and to direct the 1st Respondent to rectify the assessment order dated 20.2.2015 passed for the assessment year TIN 34620013993/2011-2012, based on the rectification application, dated 23.3.2015 of the Petitioner. WP.No.40902 of 2015 is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st Respondent ...
Lakshmi Prabha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st Respondent to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 20.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st Respondent to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 20.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 20.01.2016 has been sent by post to the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 20.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cogniza...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »