Chennai Court February 2016 Judgments
Amalorpavam Higher Secondary School, Rep. by its Correspondent Vs. Uni ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Declaration declaring the Puducherry School Education (Amendment) Rules, 2014 issued in G.O.Ms.No.11 dated 03.03.2014 published in the Extraordinary Gazette of Puducherry in so far as the same is relating to the petitioner school viz., an Unaided Private Minority School, as unconstitutional, ultra vires, illegal and invalid and the Memorandum bearing No.09/DSE/EE/FC/2015 dated 19.08.2015 issued by the third respondent based on such amendment to the petitioner school as illegal, invalid and unenforceable.) Sanjay Kishan Kaul, C.J. 1. The petitioner, an unaided private minority school, seeks to lay a challenge to the Memorandum bearing No.09/DSE/EE/FC/2015 dated 19.08.2015 issued by the third respondent/Fee Committee of the Directorate of School Education, Government of Puducherry alleging that the said Memorandum and the amendments made to the Puducherry School Education (Amendment)...
Tag this Judgment!P. Soundarapandian Vs. The Registrar, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribuna ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the First Respondent in M.A.No.33 of 2015 dated 09.09.2015 and quash the same as illegal, irregular and without jurisdiction.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the records on the file of the First Respondent/Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in M.A.No.33 of 2015 and to quash the same as illegal, irregular one and also without jurisdiction. 2. According to the Petitioner, the Second Respondent/UCO Bank, Chetpet Branch, Chennai-10 had extended financial assistance to one Geethanjali Exports and further, the Second Respondent in respect of certain issues, initiated action under the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 in O.A.No.26 of 2005 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Chennai for recovery of a sum of Rs....
Tag this Judgment!Shanthi and Another Vs. The Secretary to the Government Home Prohibiti ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent dated 26.8.2015 in Memo No.798/BCDFGISSSV/2015 against the petitioner son Thilli @ Thillinathan, male aged 26 years s/o.Mahendran who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal II, Chennai, and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. The petitioner, who is the mother of the detenu, Thilli @ Thillinathan, son of Mahendran, aged about 26 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 26.8.2015 against her son branding him as a Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum G...
Tag this Judgment!Kongu Vellalar Matric Higher Secondary School Vs. K.S. Kuppusamy and O ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 29.04.2013 made in W.P. No. 642 of 2012.) Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J. 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 29.4.2013 made in W.P. No. 642 of 2012 wherein and by which the impugned order dated 21.9.2011 passed by the Commissioner of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department in A.P. No. 42 of 2011 directing payment of 25% of arrears in respect of the temple land was modified, Kongu Vellalar Matric Higher Secondary School, has preferred the instant Writ Appeal. 2. From the materials available on record, it is seen that the land to an extent of 4.02 acres out of 10.87 acres belonging to Arulmighu Sellandiamman Thirukoil at Perundurai in Erode District, along with three buildings thereon, was leased out to Kongu Vellalar Matriculation Higher Secondary School, the appellant herein in 1982 at the rate of Rs.750/- per month, which was subsequently, fixed at Rs.5,029/- for a period of three years by a re...
Tag this Judgment!The Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Chennai and Another V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, against the order of this Court dated 12.11.2013 made in W.P.No.10684 of 2007.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Appellants/Respondents have preferred the present Writ Appeal as against the order dated 12.11.2013 in W.P.No.10684 of 2007 passed by the Learned Single Judge. 2. The Learned Single Judge, while passing the impugned order on 12.11.2013 in W.P.No.10684 of 2007 (filed by the Respondent/ Petitioner) at paragraphs 9 and 10, had observed the following: 9. At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also fairly concedes that the petitioner has violated the provisions of the Treasury Code. However, I am of the view that considering the fact that the petitioner was retired from service in the year 2009 on his attaining the age of superannuation, for the proved charges 1 and 2 under 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules instead punishment imposed of stoppage of incremen...
Tag this Judgment!Neelam Agarwal Vs. State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nad ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the letter Lr.No.DII/SICH/Auroplast/2013 dated 21.10.2014 under which the respondent has made demand of Licence fee and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to refund the amount collected under receipt dated 18.11.2008 amounting to Rs.35,01,700/- together with interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum and for granting the permission to the petitioner to sub-lease the property.) The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition questioning the correctness of the demand of licence fee made by the respondent in the letter dated 21.10.2014. After setting aside such demand, the petitioner seeks for a consequential relief to direct the respondent to refund the amount of Rs.35,01,700/- collected from her with interest and also to direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to sub-let the lease hold property to third parties. 2. The brie...
Tag this Judgment!K.S. Kuppusamy Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable En ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to fix the rent as per the market value and conduct public auction for the shops and other establishments in lands belonging to Arulmighu Sellandiamman Temple in Survey No. 787/1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Perundurai Village by considering the petitioner's representation dated 09.01.2015.) Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J. 1. The lands of the Lords are in trouble!! Even Gods and Lords are not spared. The temples in Tamil Nadu are historic symbols of Tamil history and they are the properties of the community as a whole. But God's money is robbed by the notorious society. The tenants and encroachers are defrauding on rents for the temple lands which are taken on lease and breaking of Hundis, steeling the temple jewels, the value of which are unmeasurable and the lifting of antique metal icons to other countries are increasing day by day. 2. These are illustrations of sordid handling o...
Tag this Judgment!S. Neelavathi Vs. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Mandamus, directing the First and Second Respondents to consider the representation dated 06.10.2015 seeking initiation of appropriate action against illegal/unauthorised construction without any proper planning permission by the Third Respondent on merits and within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Petitioner has filed the instant Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Respondents 1 and 2 to consider her representation dated 06.10.2015, praying for initialisation of appropriate action against an illegal/unauthorised construction put up by the Third Respondent, without obtaining any proper planning permission. 2. According to the Petitioner, the property is situated at 14, No.14, Pillayarkoil Street, Vandiamman Koil Road, Padikuppam Village, Chennai-107, devolved on herself, four sisters and the Third Respondent. The property ...
Tag this Judgment!R. Loganathan Vs. The District Collector, Thanjavur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings issued by the respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.H1/1460/2014, dated 04.11.2015, quashing the same and consequently directing the respondent to restore the original allotment place, which is already earmarked by the respondent.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Claiming to be a resident of Udayalur, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur, the petitioner has come forward with this writ petition, in public interest, seeking to quash the proceedings of the respondent, the District Collector, Thanjavur District, in Na.Ka.No.H1/1460/2014, dated 04.11.2015, by which, the District Collector has rejected the request of the petitioner, dated 27.02.2014, as well as the joint representation of presidents of, as many as eight village panchayats, dated 09.02.2014, stating that there is no need or necessity to change the place allocated for const...
Tag this Judgment!A.T. Soundarrajan Vs. State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By its Commissioner and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the Order in W.P.No.27116 of 2007 dated 05.06.2012 passed by this Court and allow the same.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Appellant has preferred the instant Writ Appeal before this Court as against the Order dated 05.06.2012 in W.P.No.27116 of 2007 passed by the Learned Single Judge. 2. The Learned Single Judge while passing the Impugned Order (in W.P.No.27116 of 2007 on 05.06.2012 filed by the Appellant/Petitioner) at Paragraph No.5 had observed the following:- "5. Even otherwise, the State Government had passed several orders on the basis of the direction issued by the Tribunal and had considered the case of almost all persons, who had staked their claim. The petitioner cannot sit back and send an appeal especially when he had reached the age of superannuation. Hence, no relief can be given to the petitioner." and dismissed the Writ Petition without costs. 3. Challenging the Order of dismissal dated 05.06.2...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »