Chennai Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Jambunathan Vs. Southern India Cinematographers Association and Oth ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-2016
1. This civil suit has been filed to pass a judgement and decree, against the Defendants:- a. declaring that the resolution passed by the General Body of the 1st Defendant on 1.8.2010 and the consequential order dated 4.8.2010, removing the Plaintiff from the primary membership of the 1st Defendant Association are null and void. b. declaring that the order of non-cooperation dated 27.7.2010 against the Plaintiff issued by the 2nd Defendant is null and void. c. granting permanent injunction, restraining the Defendants 1 and 2 from interfering with the rights of the Plaintiff to carry on his profession as a Cinematographer in the Film Industry in South India, without any interference whatsoever. d. directing the Defendants 1 and 2 to jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff damages valued at Rs.5,00,000/- caused to the Plaintiff on account of loss of business and livelihood and mental agony. e. granting mandatory injunction directing the 1st Defendant to produce its books of accounts d...
S. Santhi and Another Vs. M.R. Govindan and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 20.09.2012 made in M.C.O.P.No.1268/2010 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (XVII Additional District and Sessions Judge), Chennai-1.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed, challenging the correctness of the impugned award dated 20.09.2012 made in M.C.O.P.No.1268/2010 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (XVII Additional District and Sessions Judge), Chennai-1. 2.It is the case of the claimants that on 13.02.2010 at about 15.00 hours, when the deceased as pillion rider and his friend one Sankara Narayanan was riding the motor cycle bearing Registration No.TN-20-AC-5900 from Kattupakkam Royal Garden to Kovalam and he attempted to overtake the Tipper Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-22 BY 3699, the driver of the lorry drove the same in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motor cycle and thus, caused fat...
Arasu Pokkuvarathu Madurai Thozhilalar Sangam, Rep. by its General Sec ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-01-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to pay temporary workers (Driver, conductor and non-ITI Helper/ Junior Tradesmen including daily paid and reserve crew employees) working in the first respondent corporation at rates not below what has been prescribed in G.O.(2D) No.91, Labour and Employment Department, dated 12.12.2013 r/w the statement bearing Z3/9329/2016 dated 24.03.2016 issued by the Commissioner of Labour, Chennai 6, together with the arrears payable from 01.04.2016.) 1. I thought in this country, the best social program was a job. Yet minimum wage jobs aren't paying enough to keep families out of poverty - Barbara Mikulski. 2. This is a writ of mandamus seeking direction to the first respondent to pay the temporary workers as well as the arrears from 01.04.2016 (driver, conductor and Non-ITI helper/Junior Tradesmen, including daily paid and reserve crew employees) ...
Raj Bahadur Thappa Vs. The Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Defe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 5th respondent, dated 15.09.2014, passed in O.A.No.458 of 2013, quash the same as illegal and void and to consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 3 to sanction the post of Telephone Operator, Grade-I, with effect from August' 2002 in the 3rd respondent-Factory, with all attendant benefits, like, seniority, further promotion, etc.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order, dated 15.09.2014, made in O.A.No.458 of 2013, by which, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, has declined to sanction the post of Telephone Operator Grade I, with effect from August 2002, in the 3rd respondent-Factory, instead of 21.07.2004 and direct, revision of seniority to the petitioner, with effect from August' 2002, as Telephone Operator, Grade I, with all attendant benefits, promotion etc. 2. Facts leading to the writ pe...
M/s. Sri Krishna Water Tech Rep. by its Partner A. Jankiraman, Kanchip ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-2016
(Prayer: WP No. 40092 of 2016:- Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in his proceedings of the first respondent in his Stop Sale Notice in R.No.812/DO-KPM/FSSA dated 04.11.2016 and quash the said proceedings dated 04.11.2016.) Common Order: 1. The petitioners in these batch of writ petitions are engaged in manufacture and sale of packaged drinking water in water bottles, plastics cans and/or pouches as the case may be. The officials attached to the office of the first respondent have caused inspection of the manufacturing facility of the petitioners herein on various dates, issued stop sale notice in some cases. In some other cases, after issuing such stop sale notices, without any further notice, the manufacturing facility was sealed by the officials by either citing sub-standard of water or misbranding of water and in some cases the wat...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›