Chennai Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Special Tahsildar (ADW), Paramakudi and Others Vs. Late. Ammalu Am ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 01.04.2008 made in L.A.O.P.No.16 of 2000 on the file of the Sub Court, Paramakudi.) 1. All the appeals have been filed by the Land Acquisition Officer / Referring Officer as against the judgment and decree of the Land Acquisition Tribunal in L.A.O.P.Nos.16, 15 and 14 of 2000. 2. In all the cases, the Land Acquisition Officer has fixed compensation at the rate of Rs.168.96 per cent. The notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act in all the cases was made on 30.06.1995. The award was passed on 28.07.1997. 3. It is not in dispute that in respect of similar lands covered by the same notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, as against the judgment and decree of the Land Acquisition Tribunal in L.A.O.P.Nos.12 and 17 of 2000 and L.A.O.P.No.13 of 2000, appeals have been filed in A.S.(MD)Nos.22 and 23 of 2010 and A.S.(MD)No.190 of 2014. All...
P. Soundararajan Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 to 5 herein to survey the property situated in S.Nos.676 and 676/1A1 of Chettinayackenpatti Village, Dindigul District after affording an opportunity of hearing the Petitioner on the basis of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.13060 of 2016 dated 26.7.2016 by furnishing the copy of relevant documents in the aforesaid properties produced by sixth respondent to the Petitioner on the basis of his representation made before the fifth respondent in person dated 29.11.2016.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 to 5 herein to survey the properties situated in S.Nos.676 and 676/1A1 of Chettinayackenpatti Village, Dindigul District, after affording an opportunity of hearing the Petitioner on the basis of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.13060 of 2016, dated 26.7.2016 by fu...
K. Nandhini and Another Vs. The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission r ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: W.P. No.16553 of 2015 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent relating to the list of candidates called for the oral test dated 1.4.2015 and the records relating to the list of register numbers of candidates selected provisionally for appointment by direct recruitment for the post of Civil Judges in the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service 2013-2014 dated 2.6.2015 published by the 1st respondent and quash the same with regard to the selection of respondents 3 to 7 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to republish the list of candidates excluding respondents 3 to 7 from the General Turn PSTM category and consequently include the petitioner's name in the provisional selection list for the purpose of appointment of Civil Judge in the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service 2013-2014. W.P. No.19461 of 2015 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayin...
Dr. I. Mansoor Vs. The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Town South, Raman ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order made in Lr.No.AEE/N/T/Rama A.No.297/13 dated 08.10.2013 on the file of the respondent herein and to quash the same.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order made in Lr.No.AEE/N/T/Rama A.No.297/13 dated 08.10.2013, on the file of the respondent herein and to quash the same. 2. The petitioner was running a hospital at Devipattinam Road, Ramanathapuram. For the said hospital there were three service connections bearing Nos.301-0061526, 301-0061527 and 301-0051540. The petitioner had been regularly paying the electricity charges. While so, in respect of service connection No.301-0051540, the Metre was found faulty in May, 2009 and the same was not immediately rectified by the respondent. The said faulty Metre was rectified only after...
Durairaj and Others Vs. The District Collector, Trichy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to reclassify and granting them patta for their possessed lands situated in S.No.546 and 561 of Thuvarankurichi Village, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District according to law, based on the Petitioners representations, dated 20.6.2016.) Common Order: 1. The Petitioners seeks for a direction to the respondents to reclassify and granting them patta for their possessed lands situated in S.No.546 and 561 of Thuvarankurichi Village, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District according to law, based on the Petitioners representations, dated 20.6.2016. 2. Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petitions are taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. 4. The grievance of the Petitioners is that the above said representations submitted by...
M. Manikandan Vs. The Tahsildar, Trichy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take necessary action to measure the land at S.No.178/2 and S.No.178/2A in Thoppampatti Gillage, Trichy District.) 1. The Petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondents to measure the land at S.No.178/2 and S.No.178/2A in Thoppampatti Gillage, Trichy District. 2. Mr.A,Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. 4. It appears that the Petitioner has approached the second respondent on 16.6.2016 and paid certain fees for such purpose. The grievance of the Petitioner is that till date, the land has not been measured. 5. Therefore, without going into the merits of the claim made by the Petitioner, I only direct the second respondent to consider the request of the Petitioner and...
K. Ramasamy Vs. Ayyasamy
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 11.07.2014 made in A.S.No.13 of 2014 on the file of the Sub Court, Sankarankovil, confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.01.2014 made in O.S.No.45 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil and to dismiss the suit with costs.) 1. The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil, is the appellant in this Second Appeal. 2. The respondent herein filed a suit in O.S.No.45 of 2009 for permanent injunction restraining the appellant herein from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The suit property is an extent of 2.21.0 Hectares equivalent to 5.46 acres in Survey No.72/1, Kuruvikulam Village and Panchayat, Kalugumalai Sub Registration District, Sankarankovil Taluk. 3. The case of the respondent in the plaint are as foll...
C.R. Tamilvanan Vs. The Commissioner of Police Salem and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the common order dated 23.08.2016 rendered in W.P.No.29159 of 2016.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This in-house appeal is preferred against the order and Judgment rendered by our learned brother Justice P.N.Prakash, who by his order dated 23.08.2016, dismissed the Writ Petition, observing that since the petitioner has already instituted a Civil Suit in O.S.No.16 of 2016, before the Sub Court, Dindigul, seeking an injunction to restrain the defendant in the Suit from dispossessing him with the JCB, a movable asset in his possession, he should work out the remedies available in that regard. 2.W.P.No.29159 of 2016, has been instituted seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent Commissioner of Police, Salem, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.07.2016, as expeditiously as possible, by passing appropriate orders thereon, by directing the concerned officers working under h...
Pichaimmal and Another Vs. Arulmighu Bhadrakali Amman Temple, Kanjampu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order, dated 21.07.2016, made in I.A.No.102 of 2016 in O.S.No.165 of 2010, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kuzhithurai.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order and decretal order, dated 21.07.2016, made in I.A.No.102 of 2016 in O.S.No.165 of 2010, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kuzhithurai. 2. Facts of the case: (i) The petitioners are the defendants 11 and 12 and the respondents 1 to 4 are the plaintiffs in the suit in O.S.No.165 of 2010 on the file of Subordinate Court, Kuzhithurai. The respondents 1 to 4 filed the suit for framing a scheme decree for administration of the first respondent Temple. (ii) The petitioners filed written statement on 14.02.2013 supporting the claim of the plaintiffs. The defendants 5 to 7 also filed written statement in the month of June 2012. According to the petitioners, they also filed I.A.No.102 of...
P. Sankaran and Another Vs. The Tahsildar, Thoothukudi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
(Prayer in W.P(MD)No.24021 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from issuing Crop Insurance Certificate to other unknown persons for the Petitioner's agricultural land measuring an extent of 9.52.0 hectares and 5.66.0 hectares comprised in S.Nos.4 and 5 situated in Theivaseyalpuram, Thoothukudi District stands in patta No.31 within the time limit fixed by this Court by considering his representation dated 6.10.2016 sent by him to the first and second respondents. Prayer in W.P(MD)No.24022 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from issuing Crop Insurance Certificate to other unknown persons for the Petitioner's agricultural land measuring an extent of 5.880 hectares comprised in S.No97/3 situated in Theivaseyalpuram, Thoothukudi District stands in patta No.31 with...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »