Chennai Court December 2016 Judgments
S. Chandramoorthy Vs. The Secretary to Government, Home (Police II) De ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondents in connection with the impugned orders issued by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.Oo1/38618/16 dated 21.12.2016 and Rc.No.F1/38618/16 dated 21.12.2016 and quash the same.) Order: 1. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition as the petitioner was not given an opportunity before fixing the revision of pay and pay recovery order. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed in the post of Junior Assistant in 1995 on compassionate grounds and was subsequently promoted as Assistant. One Mrs.Elizabeth, the immediate junior to the petitioner, who was working as Special Assistant, has given a letter opting for reversion to the post of Assistant and permanently relinquished her right for promotion. Her relinquishment was accepted and she was reverted to the post of Assistant. But her name was retained at the top in the seniori...
Tag this Judgment!Thangasamy and Others Vs. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to receive respective loan amount and to return back the respective paddy bags forthwith.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents to receive respective loan amount and to return back the respective paddy bags forthwith. 2. Mr.C.Selvaraj, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The case of the petitioners that they are agriculturalists and they have mortgaged their paddy bags, which were reaped and harvested in the month of Thai and Masi, with the third respondent, while borrowing loan of Rs.3,00,000/- each. It is the further case of the petitioners that they received final notice, dated 09.12.2016, from the third respondent directing them to pay the loan amount along with the interests and other expenses, failing which, t...
Tag this Judgment!Puthiya Jananayaga Vagana Ottunargal and Techniciankal Sangam Rep. by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents 3 to 8 from altering the service conditions of the members of the petitioner-Union, (whose list of names are enclosed in the annexure to the Writ Petition), in any manner which will make result in non-employment to the members of the petitioner-Union, without getting prior permission under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner-Union, dated 16.01.2015 with regard to charter of demands which are pending conciliation before the second respondent and further direct the Conciliation Officer, viz., second respondent to conciliate and effect settlement under Section 12(3) and if no settlement is forthcoming, to submit failure report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in turn, direct the first respondent to refer the dispute for adjudication before the competent ...
Tag this Judgment!R. Masilamani Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order pertaining to the letter No.17795/UD-VII(1)/2016-3 dated 07.12.2016 issued by the first respondent, rejecting the appeal and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to dispose of the Appeal Petition on merits and in accordance with the provisions of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 under Sec.80A(2).) S. Vaidyanathan, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order pertaining to the letter No.17795/UD-VII(1)/2016-3 dated 07.12.2016 issued by the first respondent, rejecting the appeal and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to dispose of the Appeal Petition on merits and in accordance with the provi...
Tag this Judgment!K. Balakrishnan Vs. The District Collector, Kanyakumari and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the high tension wire line crossed the petitioner's house Door No.19/ 146B it is situated in re-survey No. 358/A1A Methukummal Village, Suriacode Post, Kanyakumari District and consequently, directing the respondents to draw the electricity high tension wire line through the petitioner's adjacent vacant place in same survey No.358/A1A at Methukummal Village, Suriacode Post, Kanyakumari District.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the high tension wire line crossed in his house Door No.19/ 146B which is situated in re-survey No.358/A1A, Methukummal Village, Suriacode Post, Kanyakumari District and consequently, directing the respondents to draw the electricity high tension wire line through his adjacent vacant place in same survey No.358/A1A at Methukummal Village, Suriacode Post, Kanyakumari...
Tag this Judgment!Ganesan Vs. Razia Banu
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order and decree dated 26.10.2016 made in E.P.No.102 of 2009 in R.C.O.P.No.5 of 2002 on the file of the Rent Controller cum Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition arises out of the order passed in E.P.No.102 of 2009 in R.C.O.P.No.5 of 2002 on the file of the Rent Controller cum Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam. 2. The respondent as landlord initiated eviction proceedings against the petitioner in R.C.O.P.No.5 of 2002. After contest, the learned Rent Controller, ordered eviction, which was confirmed by the appellate authority. Challenging the concurrent finding, the petitioner seems to have filed the revision in C.R.P(MD)No.2603 of 2010. Based on the eviction order, the respondent/landlord laid an execution petition in the year 2009. Since there is no stay in the revision, the Executing Court has ordered delivery. Challenging the said order, the ...
Tag this Judgment!Tvl.KLT Automotive and Tabular Products Ltd. Represented by its Author ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in TIN/CST. No.333133322462- notice of attachment in Form U dated 15.12.2016 on the 2nd respondent and quash the same as being without jurisdiction and authority of law and contrary to the principles of natural justice.) 1. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. Seeking to quash the notice of the 1st respondent dated 15.12.2016, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. The case of the petitioner is that it is the manufacturer of chassis frame assembles and mild steel tubes for automobiles Company and having three manufacturing plants and two depots all over India. The petitioner is registered as a dealer under the TNVAT Act, 2006, as well as CST Act, 1956 since 2006 onwards at Hosur and the petitioner is promptly filing monthly return in Form-I every month with paym...
Tag this Judgment!VR. Suyamprakasam Hereditary Trustee, Arulmigu Suyampirakasa Easwar Th ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-23-2016
(W.P.(MD).No.10126: This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuing a writ of certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impunged order made in Na.da.Na.Ka.No.11785/2012/L5 dated 24.05.2016 passed by the first respondent and quash the same. W.P.(MD).No.10888: This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuing a writ of certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in Na.da.Na.Ka.No.11785/2012/L5 dated 24.05.2016 and quash the same.) Common Order: Since both the writ petitions challenging the order passed by the first respondent dated 24.05.2016, the writ petitions are disposed of by way of this common order. 2. W.P.(MD).No.10126 of 2016 has been filed by a Hereditary Trustee of one Arulmigu Suyampirakasa Easwar Thiru Kovil, Iluppagudi Village, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District and W.P.(MD) No.10888 of 2016 has been filed by the p...
Tag this Judgment!G. Mani Vs. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and A ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Cr.No.7 of 2012 on the file of the respondent and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed praying to quash the FIR in Cr.No.7 of 2012 on the file of the respondent/Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Vellore Detachment, Vellore. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he joined service in the year 1980 as Assistant Engineer in the Engineering wing, Agricultural Department, thereafter he was promoted to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer and finally as Executive Engineer in the year 2008 and attained superannuation on 30.06.2015, but the very last day of his service i.e, on 30.06.2015, the petitioner was not permitted to retire from his service and he was placed under suspension, on the ground that the FIR registered by the respondent police was pending. The petitioner was not aware of the FIR dated 24.02.2012, till April 2015. The petitioner came to know whe...
Tag this Judgment!Perumalsamy Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corp ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Ref.No.Sathu A1:1484, dated 10.12.2008 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to restore the increment for one year and cancel the temporary suspension of 15 days from 17.4.2008 to 1.5.2008.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Ref.No.Sathu A1:1484, dated 10.12.2008 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to restore the increment for one year and cancel the temporary suspension of 15 days from 17.4.2008 to 1.5.2008. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. The Petitioner is said to have been caused accident for which he was placed under suspension from 16.4.2008. Dehors ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »