Chennai Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Haridoss Bhagath and Company Private Limited Vs. K. Sakthivel and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, against the Fair and Decretal order dated 17.10.2002 passed in M.C.O.P.No.61 of 1994 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional District Judge), Fast Track Court No.2, Coimbatore.) 1. This civil miscellaneous appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2002 passed in M.C.O.P.No.61 of 1994 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional District Judge), Fast Track Court No.2, Coimbatore. 2. The facts of the case are as follows:- On 22.11.1993 at about 13.00 hours, the claimant was riding on his moped bearing Registration No.TN-37-A-1341 on the North-South Mettupalayam road from South to North to see his sister. When he approached in front of the Head Office of Cheran Transport Corporation in Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, a Scooter driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner dashed against him. As a result of which, the claimant was ...
M/s. Ganapathy Sugar Industries Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. M/s. Kwi Konveyors ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against fair and decreetal order made in C.M.A.71 of 2010 on the file of the VIth Additional Judge, dated 31.03.2011 against the order made in I.A.No.20897 of 2009 in O.S.No.4946 of 2003 dated 09.04.2010 on the file of VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.) 1. The defendant in O.S.No.4946 of 2003 is the revision petitioner before this Court. 2. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendant had approached the plaintiff to purchase of Fibrizor Hammers fitted with bushes. The defendant had placed the purchase order dated 19.08.1999, Doc.No.1, received by the plaintiff at their office at Madras. Based on such purchase order, the plaintiff had sold and delivered Fibrizor Hammers fitted with bushes and had raised invoices in the defendant on 16.10.1999 and 19.10.1999 from Madras for Rs.1,50,335.10/-, as per Doc.Nos.2 and 5. The goods were duly dispatched from Madras on instructions from the defendant and th...
R. Maragatham Vs. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Trichy ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to promote the petitioner to the post of Headmistress in Panchayat Union Middle School at Manapparai.) order: M.V. Muralidaran, J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, (Kumbakonam III Divisi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer:-Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 20.01.2004 passed in M.C.O.P.No.220 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Virudhunagar.) Judgment: 1. The appellant Transport Corporation Limited filed the present civil miscellaneous appeal, challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.220 of 2002 dated 20.01.2004 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Virudhunagar. 2. It is the case of injury caused due to the accident that took place on 04.11.2002 at about 02.30 p.m on Virudhunagar Sivakasi Main. The injured/victim, filed a claim petition seeking compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Virudhunagar. The Tribunal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case awarded a sum of Rs.71,069/- with interest at 9% p.a as total compensation, against which, the appellant Transport Corporation Limited pre...
The Director General of Police and Another Vs. Ezhil and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Award dated 15.09.2010 and made in M.C.O.P.No.971 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court, Dindigul and to set aside the same.) 1. The appellants/respondents have filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the Judgment and Decree, dated 15.09.2010 made in M.C.O.P.No.971 of 2008, on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court, Dindigul. 2. It is a case of fatal accident took place on 01.09.2007 at about 10.30 a.m., near Salaipudhur main road. The deceased Bosco Gnanaraj died, after taking treatment in the hospital on 25.10.2007. Thereafter, the legal heirs filed an application seeking compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dindigul. 3. The Tribunal, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case granted award of a sum of Rs.7,97,300/- towards total compensatio...
National Insurance Company Ltd., Through its Branch Manager, Dindigul ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the order and decree dated 12.06.2006, passed in M.A.C.O.P.No.397 of 2000 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal Subordinate court, Dindigul and to allow this Appeal.) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises out of the Award passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dindigul, in M.C.O.P.No.397 of 2000, dated 12.06.2006. 2. It is a case of injury caused out of the accident took place on 18.11.1999 at about 8.00 a.m., and the injured claimant filed an application seeking compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dindigul and at the time of accident, the respondent/claimant was working as a lorry driver. 3. The Tribunal, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case and based on the medical report awarded Rs.59,577/- as total compensation. Challenging the same, the appellant/National Insuranc...
Vellai gounder and Another Vs. Raja and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 made in A.S.No.14 of 2010 on the file of the Sub-Court, Bhavani, reversal of the judgment and decree dated 29.12.2009 made in O.S.No.141 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Bhavani.) 1. The learned counsel for the respondents present. No representation for the appellants. Appellant called absent. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
A. Santhana Asha Vs. G. Arul Jegan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw the proceedings in I.D.O.P.No.34 of 2011 on the file of the District Judge, Dindigul and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Madurai.) Order: S.M. Subramaniam, J. 1. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 15.11.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner either in person or through counsel. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption for dismissal . Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Transfer Civil miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs....
The Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Theni Vs. Karuppay ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.163 of 2006 dated 30.09.2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Virudhunagar.) 1. The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.163 of 2006 dated 30.09.2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur. 2. It is a case of fatal accident that took place on 27.04.2005 at about 10.00 a.m near Kannan Thoppu Main Road. The legal heirs of the deceased filed the claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.163 of 2006 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur for compensation and the Tribunal, by considering the facts and circumstances of the case, granted a sum of Rs.2,77,000/- as total compensation with interest at 7.5% per annum. The Tribunal passed an order of pay a...
P. Rayappan and Another Vs. M. Manikandan and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
(Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 31.12.2007 passed in M.C.O.P.No.169 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Theni. Prayer:-Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 31.12.2007 passed in M.C.O.P.No.170 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Theni.) The appellants/claimants have filed the present civil miscellaneous appeals, challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.Nos.169 and 170 of 2006 dated 31.12.2007 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Theni. 2. It is a case of injury caused due to the accident that took place on 19.09.2004 at about 04.00 p.m in front of Ramesh Garden near Sathya Nagar, Sothuparai Road. The injured/victims, filed claim petitions seeking compensation before the Motor Ac...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »