Chennai Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Vellikannu Vs. State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Vasudevanall ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer: Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to Crl.M.P.No.4278 of 2016 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri, dated 22.10.2016 and set aside the 4th condition imposed in Cr.M.P.No.4278 of 2016 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri, dated 22.10.2016.) This Criminal Revision Case is filed praying to call for the records pertaining to Crl.M.P.No.4278 of 2016, on the file of the learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri, dated 22.10.2016 and set aside the 4th condition imposed therein viz., production of original R.C., Book, as one of the condition imposed for interim custody of the vehicle. 2. I have heard the submissions made by Mr.A.R.Kannappan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kandasamy, the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) for the State and also perused the materials available on record. 3. Mr.A.R.Kannappan, the le...
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.512 of 2003, dated 03.04.2013, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/III Additional Subordinate Court, Trichirappalli.) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed by the Transport Corporation challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.512 of 2003, filed on 12.12.2002. 2. It is a case of an accident which took place on 17.10.2002 at about 04.15 p.m. near Nagar Branch Road on Lalgudi Trichy road. It is a head on collusion between a car and Transport Corporation bus. The claimant who was travelling in the bus got injured and file application seeking compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Trichy. The Tribunal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, awarded a sum of Rs.17,000/- for the claimant and the appellant/Transport Corporation preferred this appeal challenging the quantum of compensation granted ...
D. Maria Prakasam Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transpor ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.513 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (III Additional Subordinate Judge), Trichy, dated 03.04.2013.) Judgment: 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was filed on account of an accident took place on 17.10.2002 at about 04.15 p.m. near Nagar Branch Road on Lalgudi Trichy road. It is a head on collusion between a car and Transport Corporation bus. The claimant who was travelling in the bus got injured and filed application seeking compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Trichirappalli. The Tribunal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, awarded a sum of Rs.17,000/- for the claimant and the appellant/claimant preferred this appeal challenging the award on the ground that the quantum of compensation granted by the Tribunal is less. 2. The learned Counsel for the appellant/claimant contended that ...
P. Malayappan Vs. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Laks ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.296 of 2015 in C.M.A.(CS)SR.No.8755/27.10.2015, dated 9.3.2016 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dindigul District, Dindigul.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking for a direction to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.296 of 2015 in C.M.A.(CS)SR.No.8755/27.10.2015, dated 9.3.2016 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. A perusal of the counter statement filed by the Department, reveals that the surcharge proceedings notice was served on the revision petitioner, but the respondent has not produced any document to show that the said notice has been served on the revision Petitioner. 3. In view of the above submission of the parties and admittedly the revision petitioner has not produced any Medical Certificate in support of his contention in the affidavit, due to the aforesaid illness, he was...
T. Rathinasamy Vs. The District Collector, Thanjavur and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to take measurement as per the petitioner's sale deed dated 21.09.1942 and grant the patta for the entire extent of land on basis of the petitioner's representation dated 06.06.2014.) 1. This writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to take measurement as per the petitioner's sale deed dated 21.09.1942 and grant patta for the entire extent of land on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 06.06.2014. 2. According to the petitioner, he was in enjoyment of the 20 cents of land in Survey No.322/8 in Vallam Pudur Village, Thanjavur District. In the above land is classified Poramboke. The third respondent is interfering with the portion of the petitioner property. Hence, the petitioner has made a representation dated 06.06.2014, to the second respondent/Tahsildar to measure the prope...
Vasantha Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpora ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.507 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (III Additional Subordinate Judge), Trichy, dated 03.04.2013.) Judgment: 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was filed on account of an accident took place on 17.10.2002 at about 04.15 p.m. near Nagar Branch Road on Lalgudi Trichy road. It is a head on collusion between a car and Transport Corporation bus. The claimant who was travelling in the bus got injured and filed application seeking compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Trichirappalli. The Tribunal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, awarded a sum of Rs.17,000/- for the claimant and the appellant/claimant preferred this appeal challenging the award on the ground that the quantum of compensation granted by the Tribunal is less. 2. The learned Counsel for the appellant/claimant contended that ...
Annalakshmi and Others Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Tra ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.516 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (III Additional Subordinate Judge), Trichy, dated 03.04.2013.) Judgment: 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was filed on account of an accident took place on 17.10.2002 at about 04.15 p.m. near Nagar Branch Road on Lalgudi Trichy road. It is a head on collusion between a car and Transport Corporation bus. The claimant who was travelling in the bus got injured and filed application seeking compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Trichirappalli. The Tribunal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, awarded a sum of Rs.17,000/- for the claimant and the appellant/claimant preferred this appeal challenging the award on the ground that the quantum of compensation granted by the Tribunal is less. 2. The learned Counsel for the appellant/claimant contended that ...
Aslam Vs. All India Council for Technical Education, rep. by its Secre ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Common Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent in connection with the impugned order of suspension passed by him in his proceedings in Ref.No.NIU/PVC/039/2016 dated 30.08.2016 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary in so far as the Petitioner is concerned.) Common Order 1. These writ petitions have been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent in connection with the impugned order of suspension passed by him in his proceedings in Ref.No.NIU/PVC/039/2016 dated 30.08.2016 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary in so far as the Petitioner is concerned. 2. Challenging the order of the suspension issued by the second respondent, these writ petitions have been filed. 3. According to the petitioners, they are studying 3rd year Engineering Course in the second respondent College and there was...
Arputham Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpora ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.511 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (III Additional Subordinate Judge), Trichy, dated 03.04.2013.) Judgment: 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was filed on account of an accident took place on 17.10.2002 at about 04.15 p.m. near Nagar Branch Road on Lalgudi Trichy road. It is a head on collusion between a car and Transport Corporation bus. The claimant who was travelling in the bus got injured and filed application seeking compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Trichirappalli. The Tribunal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, awarded a sum of Rs.17,000/- for the claimant and the appellant/claimant preferred this appeal challenging the award on the ground that the quantum of compensation granted by the Tribunal is less. 2. The learned Counsel for the appellant/claimant contended that ...
M/s. New India Assurance Company Limited, Represented by its Divisiona ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the order and decree dated 28.12.2004 made in MCOP.No.976 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub Judge, Thanjavur.) Judgment: 1. It is the case of unfortunate fatal accident took place on 22.08.2003 about 7.30 p.m near Thanjavur-Pattukottai road. The legal heirs of the deceased filed an application in MCOP.No.976 of 2003 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub Judge, Thanjavur, and the Tribunal by considering the facts and circumstances of the case, awarded Rs.3,76,000/- as total compensation with interest at 9% per annum. The appellant insurance company filed the present appeal, questioning the Award passed by the Tribunal as excessive. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant contended by stating that the multiplier applied by the Tribunal while fixing the compensation was not right and requires re-consideration. The contention of the counsel is that the Tri...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »